Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

New Oil Reserves vs. Peak Oil

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: New Oil Reserves vs. Peak Oil

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Tue 13 Sep 2016, 11:15:04

Big news about Apache's new "3 billion barrels of oil". From the sponsors of the conference:

Christmann is set to discuss Apache's plans for the discovery during a keynote address entitled ‘Alpine High & Permian-Wide' at 1:15 p.m. Tuesday, November 8, during Hart Energy's 2016 Executive Oil Conference. The conference and exhibition, scheduled November 7-8 in Midland, TX at the Midland County Horseshoe Pavilion, attracts top executives and decision makers from the region's most-active exploration and production companies for world-class conference sessions about effective strategies, trends and technologies that will increase operational efficiency.

It will be very interesting to see what actual data he shares. BTW Apache, like every other company, doesn't give a sh*t what the rest of the oil patch thinks about what any company says. His presentation will specifically target Wall Street analysts.

And no: the Rockman won't be attending.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: New Oil Reserves vs. Peak Oil

Unread postby ennui2 » Tue 13 Sep 2016, 12:22:12

The confusion here is that nobody really knows what they're advocating anymore.

On the one hand, we're still currently in a supply glut. So there can be a simple argument pro/con whether we're in a glut or how long that's going to last.

The second part of it is how price will respond to supply going forward.

ETP suggests only a downward spiral in prices. To those who reject the idea that low oil prices are a problem, this instills no fear whatsoever, in fact the reverse. This is why when I point to the current price of gas, I am saying just that. Or talking about summer road-trips.

ETP's ability to get people quaking in their boots rests on the idea that as prices stay low or go lower, that this reflects demand destruction and the lock-step unwinding of global GDP. This has been seriously overstated, as many rebuttals have proven. Also, it's very easy to confuse normal economic boom and bust cycles with the impact of oil supply/prices (high or low).

On the flipside you have classic peak oil doom, which is oil shortages, burning the furniture, Mad Max and Toecutter and what not.

Some of the flippant attempts to portray a post-peak dystopia continue to rely on classic peak oil dystopian imagery, which seems incompatible with ETP's "oil is worthless, hence cheap and abundand" narrative.

With this logical inversion of oil being cheap being equated with an ominous sign or portend of doom, it's no longer possible for rational moderate peakers to communicate with ETP nuts because we're simply not speaking the same language anymore.

The longer oil stays cheap, the LESS a rational peaker will feel that the sky is about to fall.

And yet ETP advocates keep saying "Look how cheap oil is! Isn't this scary???"

No, it's not scary. It's a glut and this is actually a GOOD THING for the economy other than those who work in the oil patch or those who would have liked oil scarcity to encourage the move to renewables.

This is pretty much the long and short of it all. As long as ETP insists that cheap oil is a bad thing and classic peakists insist that cheap oil is good, we're just going to keep talking past each other.
"If the oil price crosses above the Etp maximum oil price curve within the next month, I will leave the forum." --SumYunGai (9/21/2016)
User avatar
ennui2
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3920
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 10:37:02
Location: Not on Homeworld

Re: New Oil Reserves vs. Peak Oil

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Tue 13 Sep 2016, 13:53:33

"ETP's ability to get people quaking in their boots...". Sorry, did I miss something? I haven't seen much " quacking" in these here parts. And in the oil patch (where drilling decisions are made) the Rockman has not talked to one person in his world that has ever heard of "ETP". I'm sure some in the oil patch must have but not any of the hundreds the Rockman knows.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: New Oil Reserves vs. Peak Oil

Unread postby ennui2 » Tue 13 Sep 2016, 13:56:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', '&')quot;ETP's ability to get people quaking in their boots...". Sorry, did I miss something? I haven't seen much " quacking" in these here parts. And in the oil patch (where drilling decisions are made) the Rockman has not talked to one person in his world that has ever heard of "ETP". I'm sure some in the oil patch must have but not any of the hundreds the Rockman knows.



The purpose of my statement is that ETP zealots are attempting to get people to quake in their boots.
"If the oil price crosses above the Etp maximum oil price curve within the next month, I will leave the forum." --SumYunGai (9/21/2016)
User avatar
ennui2
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3920
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 10:37:02
Location: Not on Homeworld

Re: New Oil Reserves vs. Peak Oil

Unread postby SumYunGai » Wed 14 Sep 2016, 00:30:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ennui2', 'E')TP suggests only a downward spiral in prices. To those who reject the idea that low oil prices are a problem, this instills no fear whatsoever, in fact the reverse.

That is too bad. Those who reject the idea that low oil prices are a problem are wrong.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ennui2', 'O')n the flipside you have classic peak oil doom, which is oil shortages, burning the furniture, Mad Max and Toecutter and what not.

1. Etp peak oil doom also leads to oil shortages, burning the furniture, Mad Max and Toecutter and what not, so it's not really a flip side at all.

2. Etp peak oil doom has a fairly specific timeline, classic peak oil doom does not. Because of this, Etp peak oil doom is *WAY* scarier than classic peak oil doom. Apocalypse now kicks apocalypse someday's ass!

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ennui2', 'T')he longer oil stays cheap, the LESS a rational peaker will feel that the sky is about to fall.

Yes, this is a perception problem that causes "rational peakers" like yourself to keep getting it wrong. So called "rational peakers" aren't so rational after all. But it really doesn't matter. The economy is about to implode very soon. Then even "rational peakers" will feel the sky is about to fall.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ennui2', 'A')nd yet ETP advocates keep saying "Look how cheap oil is! Isn't this scary???"

No, it's not scary. It's a glut and this is actually a GOOD THING for the economy other than those who work in the oil patch or those who would have liked oil scarcity to encourage the move to renewables.

There are always winners and losers, but low oil prices are not really a good thing for the overall economy. Seems like "classic peakists" need to stop being so myopic.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ennui2', 'T')his is pretty much the long and short of it all. As long as ETP insists that cheap oil is a bad thing and classic peakists insist that cheap oil is good, we're just going to keep talking past each other.

Your stubborn confusion is not my problem. Once you figure out that cheap oil is not really good if oil is being sold below it's cost of production (since that is clearly not sustainable for civilization as a whole), then we will be able to stop talking past one another.
User avatar
SumYunGai
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 421
Joined: Fri 29 Jul 2016, 21:02:21
Top

Re: New Oil Reserves vs. Peak Oil

Unread postby ennui2 » Wed 14 Sep 2016, 01:01:35

Oil companies will not, I repeat will not, intentionally bankrupt themselves the way you think they will. What happened was the Saudis intentionally sabotaged the fracking scene because their costs are lower than frackers. They exploited this differential, although in the process, they also cut into their own profit margins and can't hold frackers down indefinitely. That's all that's going on here. A turf battle between the middle-east and the US.

It will pass and at some point the middle-east will learn to coexist with frackers with oil at a higher (profitable) price-point. If Saudis go into terminal decline then price will only go up anyway, spurring on more fracking as the activity will be that much more profitable, hence putting a cap on how high oil can go.

The crazy thing is that half the rhetoric here is still flogging geological depletion. You can't fearmonger about the wells going dry while simultaneously saying prices will crater. It doesn't work out that way. As costs to produce go up, the cost to the consumer will also go up to compensate for the overhead. As total supply goes down, prices will go up. People some here still admire in posterity (like Matt Simmons) were all pushing this narrative. Some people want to have their cake and eat it too. You can't.
"If the oil price crosses above the Etp maximum oil price curve within the next month, I will leave the forum." --SumYunGai (9/21/2016)
User avatar
ennui2
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3920
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 10:37:02
Location: Not on Homeworld

Re: New Oil Reserves vs. Peak Oil

Unread postby SumYunGai » Wed 14 Sep 2016, 01:46:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ennui2', 'O')il companies will not, I repeat will not, intentionally bankrupt themselves the way you think they will.

You need not repeat yourself since I don't believe that oil companies will bankrupt themselves intentionally. I don't think oil companies can do anything to stop themselves from eventually going bankrupt. Their intent is irrelevant. The price of oil is determined by the laws of physics, not the Saudis.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ennui2', 'Y')ou can't fearmonger about the wells going dry while simultaneously saying prices will crater.

Sure I can. As oil prices go down, production is lost. It is happening already.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ennui2', 'I')t doesn't work out that way.

It has been working out that way so far.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ennui2', 'A')s costs to produce go up, the cost to the consumer will also go up to compensate for the overhead.

Oh, I see. And of course the consumer will be able to pay whatever price is required, right? Is there any limit to how high the price of oil can go?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ennui2', 'A')s total supply goes down, prices will go up.
To infinity? You do realize that oil supplies a large percentage of total available energy and that the amount of total available energy is what determines economic growth? Where do you think people get the money from to buy oil?
User avatar
SumYunGai
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 421
Joined: Fri 29 Jul 2016, 21:02:21
Top

Re: New Oil Reserves vs. Peak Oil

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Wed 14 Sep 2016, 09:05:02

Y'all get so focused on generalities you can't see the the forest for the f*cking trees. LOL. Oil companies aren't "going to go bankrupt" and they are not not "going to go bankrupt". I appreciate that not understanding the business leaves many with no choice but to make rather meaningless generalities. For instance that companies can't increase reserves profitably at today's prices. Here's company that just added $2 BILLION worth of profitable oil reserves to their books. And if oil prices bump up in a year or two even more profitable.

Yes: a number of companies have become financially crippled. But many others are adding oil reserves at a lowest cost then they've been able to for more then 10 years. I can't estimate what Anadarko paid but it's obviously much less the $45/bbl otherwise they would't have bought the reserves. And now the sellers has gotten a $2 BILLION infusion to help them survive:

.Anadarko Petroleum Corp., Houston, has agreed to acquire the deepwater Gulf of Mexico assets belonging to Freeport McMoRan Oil & Gas (FMOG), a subsidiary of Phoenix-based mining firm Freeport-McMoRan Inc., for $2 billion.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: New Oil Reserves vs. Peak Oil

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Wed 14 Sep 2016, 09:13:50

"Sure I can. As oil prices go down, production is lost. It is happening already." Do I assume correctly that you're misusing the word "production" to mean drilling new wells. Given that on average wells cost less to CONTINUE producing then the current price we aren't "losing production". The fact that the world is producing so much oil today proves that.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: New Oil Reserves vs. Peak Oil

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Wed 14 Sep 2016, 11:17:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut many others are adding oil reserves at a lowest cost then they've been able to for more then 10 years. I can't estimate what Anadarko paid but it's obviously much less the $45/bbl otherwise they would't have bought the reserves. And now the sellers has gotten a $2 BILLION infusion to help them survive:


agreed. This goes to what I said previously about low prices creating efficiencies in the industry. Both you and I have lived through a number of downturns that resulted in rebalancing of oil companies that eventually became stronger. We remember Chevron buying Gulf, Chevron and Texaco, Exxon and Mobil, Conoco and Phillips, Amerada Hess and Triton, Shell and Enterprise as amalgamations that made a solid large company out of two weaker entities. Also what you say about companies adding reserves is important, especially for their shareholders who look to reserve life as one of the key indices. Wood Mac's review in 2014 noted that from 2008 to 2012 there were 6 well known companies that increased reserves 500% (Kosmos, Lundin, Noble, Tullow, Anadarko and BG) and there were a number of companies who replaced reserves in the range of 100% up to 400% including Talisman, Repsol, Hess, Santos, RWE, Eni, Murphy, Cairn, Marathon, Petrobras, Statoil, Apache, Maersk, Premier, ConocoPhillips, Woodside OMV, Petronas, Shell, Total etc.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: New Oil Reserves vs. Peak Oil

Unread postby SumYunGai » Wed 14 Sep 2016, 12:17:19

Here come the experts.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', 'O')il companies aren't "going to go bankrupt" and they are not not "going to go bankrupt".

Just keep repeating that mantra if it makes you feel better.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/christopher ... d9eadf739b

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]The 15 Biggest Oil Bankruptcies (So Far)

The pace of oil patch bankruptcies is picking up. According to a new count from Houston law firm Haynes & Boone, April saw 11 bankruptcy filings, the most of any month in the past two years. The headline failures that month were Ultra Petroleum UPL +%, which buckled under $3.9 billion in debt, and Energy XXI, which carried debt of $2.9 billion.

All told, 69 oil and gas producers with $34.3 billion in cumulative secured and unsecured debt have gone under. Since share prices peaked in 2014, the oil bust has wiped out about $1 trillion in equity, with the Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index off 40%.

There’s more to come. “Despite the modest recovery in energy prices, all indications suggest many more producer bankruptcy filings will occur during 2016,” writes Haynes & Boone. According to Deloitte, about a third of global oil and gas companies, or about 175 of them, are at risk of insolvency. Bernstein Research estimates that by 2019 we’ll see more than $70 billion in defaults amid more than $400 billion in high-yield energy debt — that would indicate that we’re only halfway through the bankruptcies.

The biggest failure of the oil bust so far has been Canadian-listed Pacific Exploration & Production, which produces heavy oil in Colombia, and entered bankruptcy with $5.3 billion in debt.

Second-biggest is Tulsa, Okla.-based Samson Resources, which K.K.R. acquired from the family of billionaire Lynn Schusterman in a 2011 LBO for $7.2 billion, including more than $4 billion in debt. In its bankruptcy filings, Samson estimated its value at $1.5 billion.

What’s striking is how little the creditors of some of these bankrupt firms are getting in liquidation. Quicksilver Resources filed Chapter 11 with $2.1 billion in debt. Its assets, in the Barnett shale and west Texas, eventually sold for just $245 million in cash.

Meanwhile, Dune Energy only got $20 million for its oil and gas fields in Texas and Louisiana, against $144 million in debt. BPZ Resources, which operates in Peru had $275 million in debt; its assets sold for only $9 million.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rockdoc123', 'W')ood Mac's review in 2014 noted that from 2008 to 2012 there were 6 well known companies that increased reserves 500%

Growing oil reserves is certainly important. That is why there is so much concern over the fact that reserves are no longer being replaced sufficiently. So from 2008-2012 many companies increased their reserves. Okay. Why is that relevant to what is happening now? Why list those companies in detail such? What does it prove?
User avatar
SumYunGai
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 421
Joined: Fri 29 Jul 2016, 21:02:21
Top

Re: New Oil Reserves vs. Peak Oil

Unread postby Observerbrb » Wed 14 Sep 2016, 12:30:28

You need high Oil prices to expand your Oil resource base, because this same resource is increasingly expensive to get. W/ low oil prices, your resource base shrinks. Prices would need to rise again to reverse this trend.

This is not rocket science, and that explains our main reasoning: Peak Oil could only occur if Oil prices are low/Oil is expensive to get.

Another option would be: Prices are high (~100 $), but oil is even more expensive to get. From my understanding, this reasoning is not feasible, since "Oil -mostly- drives its own demand". If oil becomes more and more expensive to get, it would drain more and more resources from the rest of the economy - thus the ability of the economy to pay for this oil will go down, as it is currently doing.
Observerbrb
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 408
Joined: Mon 08 Dec 2014, 15:24:48

Re: New Oil Reserves vs. Peak Oil

Unread postby Plantagenet » Wed 14 Sep 2016, 12:44:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Observerbrb', ' ')Peak Oil could only occur if Oil prices are low/Oil is expensive to get.

Another option would be: Prices are high (~100 $), but oil is even more expensive to get. From my understanding, this reasoning is not feasible, since "Oil -mostly- drives its own demand". If oil becomes more and more expensive to get, it would drain more and more resources from the rest of the economy - thus the ability of the economy to pay for this oil will go down, as it is currently doing.


The ability of the "economy to pay for this oil" is not going down. Workers in the US just had its biggest increase in earning power in the last 50 years according to the Obama administration. GDP growth is still strong in India and China and oil demand is still increasing there.

The low oil prices we are currently see are due to the oil glut---not due to an inability to pay or a drop in demand.

Cheers!

Image
The world is still in an oil glut
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: New Oil Reserves vs. Peak Oil

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Wed 14 Sep 2016, 13:02:06

"Why list those companies in detail such? What does it prove?" It proves you don't understand the entire dynamics of the energy business. By focusing on only the finacially crippled companies you're completly missing the huge finacial GAINS other companies are making. Companies, thanks to acquiring huge PROVEN oil reserves far cheaper then they could have developed in the last 20+ years by drilling , that are looking at a great future that will require just a modest rise in oil prices. IOW the huge reserves developed in the recent past (regardless of how many companies those effort created) have not DISAPPERED. They still there and much of it is being acquired by companies at truly bargain basement prices. Fewer companies control those reserves then there several years. IOW one of the biggest fossil fuel wealth transfers in decades is happening now and so many Monday morning quarterbacks aren't even aware.

That's why it's so f*cking important even if you don't understand it. LOL.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: New Oil Reserves vs. Peak Oil

Unread postby AdamB » Wed 14 Sep 2016, 13:35:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '
')Don't you have anything long, smart-sounding (and really dumb) to say about reserves?


Sure, but you don't have what it takes to understand it, so why bother?
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 11018
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26
Top

Re: New Oil Reserves vs. Peak Oil

Unread postby AdamB » Wed 14 Sep 2016, 13:38:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', 'A')nd in the oil patch (where drilling decisions are made) the Rockman has not talked to one person in his world that has ever heard of "ETP". I'm sure some in the oil patch must have but not any of the hundreds the Rockman knows.


Why would they have heard of it? Oil patch folks don't tend to be gullible, and that is prerequisite to buy into the spurious relationship that Etp is selling.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 11018
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26
Top

Re: New Oil Reserves vs. Peak Oil

Unread postby AdamB » Wed 14 Sep 2016, 13:41:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Observerbrb', 'Y')ou need high Oil prices to expand your Oil resource base, because this same resource is increasingly expensive to get.


You mean like between 1930 and 1970 when the real price was fairly stable and the same oil resource base expanded by orders of magnitude?

THINK PEOPLE, IT ISN'T THAT HARD.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 11018
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26
Top

Re: New Oil Reserves vs. Peak Oil

Unread postby Observerbrb » Wed 14 Sep 2016, 14:03:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AdamB', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Observerbrb', 'Y')ou need high Oil prices to expand your Oil resource base, because this same resource is increasingly expensive to get.


You mean like between 1930 and 1970 when the real price was fairly stable and the same oil resource base expanded by orders of magnitude?

THINK PEOPLE, IT ISN'T THAT HARD.


No, because Oil was not becoming increasingly expensive to get (at least, not at the current rate). Today, it is.

Image

Image

It's unfortunate that EIA doesn't have more recent data than 2008 for this analysis, because the sharp downturn at the end of this chart owed mostly to the economic crash in the latter half of that year. Analogous recent data from the oil patch suggests that the curves in the above chart should have resumed their previous, pre-crash trajectory by now

--------

The writer of the article (it was written in 2012) even said:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_code('', 'THE 2014 – 2015 TIPPING POINT
Unconventional oil is currently just 3 percent of global supply. The IEA projects that it will make up 6.5 percent of supply by 2020, and 10 percent by 2035. As it gradually replaces cheap oil conventional oil, its real production costs will continue to push oil prices up. Eventually, those costs will cross with the pain tolerance limit of consumers.

Skrebowski sees rising costs outrunning the ability of economies to adapt to higher oil prices by 2014, producing an "economically determined peak" in oil production. After that point, prices will remain economically destructive, and render sustained economic growth impossible. At the same time, it will make new oil production harder to finance.

This matches well with numerous analyses of oil supply that project a major tipping point around 2014 – 2015.')

It seems that we just found another winner, Mr. Skrebowski
http://www.zdnet.com/article/the-cost-o ... il-supply/

PS. Skrebowski argument is based on "a pain tolerance limit for consumers" - We might disagree on how he sees this limit. (Static - at 100 $/barrel vs Continuously Decreasing ). As you know, I go for the second option.
Observerbrb
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 408
Joined: Mon 08 Dec 2014, 15:24:48
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron