by Observerbrb » Mon 12 Sep 2016, 10:01:39
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ennui2', '
')
The reason some people can't accept it that some people can't let go of the clarion calls of doom before the fall of 2008.
ETP provides an apologia for this. It's an implausible one, but it's all these people have to hang their hat on.
Now, if they would just CAPITULATE to us being in a supply glut, then we could let go of the past and move forward once and for all. But no, that would be too humiliating.
You're completely wrong on this one. In fact, as I have explained several times, I thought that PO was "decades ahead" of us, and it could be an issue in decades, as well. I thought that we were going to experience a plateau. I was wrong, I don't have problems to admit it... the problem is occurring in front of everyone's eyes, and we are not going to experience a plateau.
I was so, so wrong, that I could have not even imagined that we could experience this problem in late 2010's.
Steve Ludlum's explanation makes complete sense to me, and so far I have not considered other options to be feasible. I try to use my logic, and so far, I have been right ("Oil prices have not recovered"). Why should I change my views if I'm right as of today?