by AgentR11 » Thu 08 Sep 2016, 16:21:46
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ennui2', 'C')ould someone give an example of the MSM, by virtue of wanting to "sell soap" reporting an untruth? And I'm talking about something that is directly relevant to doom, today.
untruth, as in intentionally misleading is FAR to strong an assertion from what I wrote. They repeat press releases, and quote people from conferences.
That is by definition not an UNTRUTH; but if you rely on that to achieve an understanding of the world we live in, you will be very poorly served.
There is also the issue of editorial selection; so I WILL give you a "sell soap" example. With the Syria issue, it is important that each story express a good guy/bad guy narrative, with various quotes from the anointed good guys, and the anointed bad guys. There is hardly any coverage of how many and which Russian transports have sailed from Novorossysk to Tartus this week, or this month; no coverage of whether they are flying Turkish courtesy flags during transit, no coverage of what tonnage of material they are moving, and in which direction. Basically, there is no good guy, bad guy thing going on there, but it is FAR more relevant to the Syrian war than anything about some supposed hospital getting blown up for the 18th time, or the "last doctor in Allepo" is killed.... (repeat each week ad nauseum). THAT does produce a story with a good guy/bad guy thing, and an "outrage of the day" hook; but it is completely and totally irrelevant to this final stage of the Syrian conflict.
Basically, our media hates reporting anything where THEY have to go out and count stuff, measure stuff, weigh stuff. Because it is EXPENSIVE reporting. They'd much rather take a white house press release, decorate it a bit, and publish with a couple quotes from random morons.