by ennui2 » Mon 20 Jun 2016, 08:03:37
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')The Korowicz paper is not the Etp model.
Then why are you flogging it?
You understand what cherry picking is, right? The internet makes it incredibly easy to find pseudo-scientific papers that say whatever it is you want to say. But that doesn't mean their speculations are correct.
Again, the millions of words of technical gobblygook dumped into The Oil Drum is exhibit A for why it is intellectually brain-dead to appeal to authority just because something kinda sounds logical.
At one time I totally respected TOD analysis, but most of it has now been discredited, exposed as a group of smart people colored by their own bias, starting with a conclusion (doom) and back-casting it into how they interpreted the data. There's no way I can accept papers like this at face value anymore.
Note the source, Faesta. Note what other activist material is there:
http://www.feasta.org/2016/03/29/unconv ... al-agency/http://www.credoeconomics.com/shale-eup ... tural-gas/You see a pattern? Do you think the analysis is going to be truly objective?
The conclusions they have to make suit their political agenda. It doesn't mean it HAS to be wrong, but you need to be able to confirm it against other sources that don't have the same axe to grind.
"If the oil price crosses above the Etp maximum oil price curve within the next month, I will leave the forum." --SumYunGai (9/21/2016)