Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Unintended Consequences

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Is waiting for consequences good enough?

Unread postby ennui2 » Sat 30 Apr 2016, 18:10:53

Greer advocates "green wizardry" which is to turn inward, bulk up your survival skills, and when things get bad enough, expect the neighbors to finally appreciate what you're doing and act as a mentor. That's probably the approach that produces the least amount of friction and stress.

Big A activism, picketing, protesting, 350.org type stuff, even Transition Town, I just don't think any of it has a chance of hitting critical mass while BAU is still in place.
"If the oil price crosses above the Etp maximum oil price curve within the next month, I will leave the forum." --SumYunGai (9/21/2016)
User avatar
ennui2
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3920
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 10:37:02
Location: Not on Homeworld

Re: Is waiting for consequences good enough?

Unread postby onlooker » Sat 30 Apr 2016, 18:14:47

Thanks Ibon. Yes totally agree that consequences and actions will work in tandem. Oh and congratulations on having and molding a daughter that is making you proud.
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: Is waiting for consequences good enough?

Unread postby careinke » Tue 17 May 2016, 18:41:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ennui2', 'G')reer advocates "green wizardry" which is to turn inward, bulk up your survival skills, and when things get bad enough, expect the neighbors to finally appreciate what you're doing and act as a mentor. That's probably the approach that produces the least amount of friction and stress.

Big A activism, picketing, protesting, 350.org type stuff, even Transition Town, I just don't think any of it has a chance of hitting critical mass while BAU is still in place.


At least around me, this is already happening with 20-30 somethings observing the stuff I do, then apply the techniques, tips, and principle to their own properties. My kids are both "blue Collar" workers in their 30's. Of course they bring their friends out here to the beach frequently with many overnights. All are aware of the hardships heading their way.

Working on construction has honed them and their friends to manage their intermittent incomes well. They take the extra cash when times are good (like right now), and invest it in things that make them more resilient and self sufficient during non paid times. During those times they work on infrastructure at home. Almost all avoid debt like the plague, except for their property, and even there they make extra payments when they can.

Lots of them are interested in Permaculture, and frequently call me up for advise. Most have not gone to college, but spend lots of time on the internet researching various ways to do/build/make things online. As I've heard them say more than once "you tube is your friend."

Anyway this has given me a lot of hope, at least some are awake, and taking measures to prepare far a uncertain world.

On the permaculture side, adaptation is growing geometrically. It is expected a tipping point will be reached at an adoption rate of around 14-16 percent. Permaculture is now a recognized discipline for disaster relief with the UN. With the internet, and more and more people, testing more and more designs while freely sharing both success and failures, the knowledge base is also expanding rapidly.

Intellectually, I cannot see any major hurdles with everybody adopting at least the permaculture prime directive and three ethics. I know of Permaculturists in every faith and every location around the globe. Although there is no metaphysics in permaculture, you can have permaculture in churches, synagogues, and mosques, no problem.

I would be interested in negative feedback on the "Prime Directive"

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he only ethical decision is to take responsibility for our own existence and that of our children.


Or the three ethics:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '1').Care of the Earth, 2. Care of people, and 3. Set limits to consumption and reproduction, and redistribute surplus to the benefit of the Earth and people.


I feel these principles will eventually be widely adopted or there is no hope. Fortunately, at least in this little section of the world, I see it happening at the personal level. Yes upcoming events are going to be hard and sometimes deadly, but there are a lot of us green anarchists that will be around to help the others when they wake up.
Cliff (Start a rEVOLution, grow a garden)
User avatar
careinke
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 5047
Joined: Mon 01 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Is waiting for consequences good enough?

Unread postby Cog » Tue 17 May 2016, 20:51:33

I would like some clarification on this ethic:

3. Set limits to consumption and reproduction, and redistribute surplus to the benefit of the Earth and people.

In practical terms what does it mean with regards to implementation and enforcement?
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: Is waiting for consequences good enough?

Unread postby careinke » Wed 18 May 2016, 01:42:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', 'I') would like some clarification on this ethic:

3. Set limits to consumption and reproduction, and redistribute surplus to the benefit of the Earth and people.

In practical terms what does it mean with regards to implementation and enforcement?

It means you voluntarily give up some of your wealth and/or income, my government does it to you, or the world's poor will do it for us. In lieu of the former the latter will happen, it always has.


I have a slightly different take on the third ethic. I think the third ethic is the most misunderstood or not fully understood by most people. It has lots of practical applications across multiple fields. I'll break it down for you with some examples, just realize that it applies to most scientific disciplines. Remember, these are ethics, not orders.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')et limits to consumption
Lots of examples here, like eating, you eat to much food = bad health, more impact on the environment, more resources required for medical care etc.. If we over consume Cod, the fish population collapses and you have no more Cod to eat. Honestly, does anyone really need six private jets, as an individual?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'a')nd reproduction
The obvious one is human overpopulation exceeding the earths carrying capacity. If you don't control reproduction, you will eventually exceed carrying capacity. By the same token, you don't overload the land with to many animals, like feedlots. You also avoid monocultures because they are unsustainable and more akin to mining than regenerative practices.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'a')nd redistribute surplus
This is a key tenant in permaculture, if what you are doing does not produce a surplus, it is not permaculture, and really serves no useful purpose. So why do it? You need to think beyond sustainability and more toward regeneration and repair. So surplus is more than you need or can use, so what do you do with it?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 't')o the benefit of the Earth All of your surplus organic matter can just be put back into the soil either directly or (my preference) even further refined through animals and then go back to the soil. There really is NO good reason for any organic matter to leave your property with the proper design. Plus this organic material should be used to enhance the environment, not damage it and create giant offshore dead zones.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'a')nd people. This is where it gets a little sticky. In America, (not so much in other counties), there are two basic kinds of Permies; Browns and Purples. Purples interpret this to means everyone should just give their surplus away to anyone in need. This is the angle P leans towards and it usually involves government.

Brown Permies are usually anarchists (or soon become one) and we interpret this part to mean like trading goods and services with our surpluses to others who have different surpluses. Or maybe give extra food to a food bank with a note attached that says something like "I can show you how to grow this yourself." Use your surplus time to teach other neighbors how to make their life better both health wise, money wise, and ecologically beneficial.

The "Comie Anarchists" Purple Permies, keep trying to change the last ethic to "Fair Share" and shorten the other two so the ethics in that version are: Earth Care, People Care, Fair Share." But to paraphrase Holgrem, (the co-founder of Permaculture), Just because it Rymes, doesn't make it right.

So in answer to your question on "enforcement," there is none. Most permies eschew the use of force, except in self defense, which is why most become Anarchists try to reduce their involvement with government, making them redundant.

Hopefully this helps, and I didn't just make things even more confusing.
Cliff (Start a rEVOLution, grow a garden)
User avatar
careinke
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 5047
Joined: Mon 01 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Pacific Northwest
Top

Re: Is waiting for consequences good enough?

Unread postby Cog » Wed 18 May 2016, 05:18:35

Thanks for clearing that up. I had envisioned throngs of permies. armed with garden trowels. beating me about the head and shoulders because I stored some extra apples.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: Is waiting for consequences good enough?

Unread postby careinke » Wed 18 May 2016, 06:55:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', 'T')hanks for clearing that up. I had envisioned throngs of permies. armed with garden trowels. beating me about the head and shoulders because I stored some extra apples.


Nope, but some believe if we grow large enough, we will be able to quickly collapse the current system by providing workable solutions making the current system redundant.

Mankind proved they have the power to destroy the ecosystem. We are the only species on earth, with even a hope of fixing it. The only ethical answer is we should all be working to fix this, even if the odds are against us.

Trying to adhere to the three ethics gives you a baseline to judge your own actions. The areas of your life in conflict with the ethics points you towards the areas you should be working to fix.

Makes things simpler.
Cliff (Start a rEVOLution, grow a garden)
User avatar
careinke
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 5047
Joined: Mon 01 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Pacific Northwest
Top

Re: THE Natural Gas Thread Pt. 2

Unread postby jawagord » Mon 29 Oct 2018, 18:29:23

Is there an unintended consequences thread?

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/busines ... t-amid-us/
Don't deny the peak!
jawagord
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 314
Joined: Mon 29 May 2017, 10:49:17

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron