by ennui2 » Wed 02 Mar 2016, 12:54:31
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '
')Which general-beat hack penned this crap?
PStarr translation: I don't like the message so I must shoot the messenger.
It's Reuters, not Zerohedge. It's a reasonable appeal to authority.
What Outcast_Searcher just said about bias is right on the money, too.
There is a profound lack of reflection on the part of doomers to how they spin the news. Anything negative is treated as a "sign" of doom. Anything positive is shrugged off for one reason or another. It's this lock-step group-think. I understand people have a profound need for simplicity. Black and white. But the world is not that cut and dried. It's shades of gray.
As far as I'm concerned there needs to be a devil's advocate here because there is no true objectivity whatsoever, which will, unchecked, lead people to have absolutely no ability to tease out what's likely to happen next.
I mean, what do you people really want? Do you want to try to understand where we are or do you want to buttress and protect your own favored apocalyptic narratives?
The future will suck enough as it is without needing to be embellished by people's biases. All you have to do is just show a little more patience.
"If the oil price crosses above the Etp maximum oil price curve within the next month, I will leave the forum." --SumYunGai (9/21/2016)