Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Has the danger of Peak Oil passed?

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Has the danger of Peak Oil passed?

Unread postby tita » Fri 19 Feb 2016, 06:16:45

AdamB - Budgets are not made from "guessing" the next year price. You just take the last year (or last quarter) price. It's the work of traders to guess the future price.
User avatar
tita
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Fri 10 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Has the danger of Peak Oil passed?

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Fri 19 Feb 2016, 09:37:52

Adam - "How in the world can you do your companies reserve estimates if you don't ever have to write down the price of oil you expect to get for your product....next year?” two different answers. First, public companies: you can pull up the SEC reserve reporting guidelines but eventually the pubcos will have outside auditors, using oil prices as DICTATED by the SEC, will calculate the company’s asset base. In addition to producing a lower revenue stream from a lower price a certain amount of reserves themselves will be removed from the count if they can’t be economically produced at the lower price.

And the private companies like Rockman’s: we don’t write down reserves per se because we don’t have to tell anyone about our business. Except, of course, our bankers if they provide the company with its borrowing base. And the bankers have their own auditors do that analysis so they don’t really care what the company has to say about reserves.

And then there are those rare companies like the Rockman’s that doesn’t borrow money: his owner is stinking rich! LOL. And trust me: he knows exactly what he owns, how much he has invested and what his future revenue will be BASED UPON WHAT HE ESTIMATES future prices will be. His money…his rules. One great advantage is that the Rockman’s company can change it business plan in one day. New plan as of a couple of months ago: no drilling unless absolutely necessary. Unless it’s economical using $20/bbl and recovers 100% of the investment in 18 months. Nearly impossible to find. OTOH he gave the Rockman and his cohorts $250 million to do acquisitions this year…he smells blood in the water and wants to take advantage of it. No different than any other business, like real estate or the stock market: buy low…sell high. The trick is to have the money to buy when everyone else is bloke. But not as easy as you might think: the vast majority of production in our theater of operations isn’t worth having because there isn’t much left to improve. So oddly were under as much pressure as those companies that are broke: if we can’t meet his goals we’re gone. My owner didn’t make $billions by funding failure. LOL.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Has the danger of Peak Oil passed?

Unread postby AdamB » Fri 19 Feb 2016, 17:31:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'A')dam, resource cost curve?
If you or the market are willing to pay me $1 million dollars/barrel, I promise to convert a carbon-rich source of your choice to lovely free-flowing liquid petroleum. TDP, Fischer–Tropsch, any way you choose. Everything is oil. That is the upper bounds.

Now if you or said market is $300 trillion in hock and has entered a financial tailspin without cash or a pot to piss in then there is your lower bounds. There is none.

The resource cost curve.


Yes. A resource cost curve. Do you have one, or know of any peak oiler that has ever produced one, or not? You implied that all the famous peak oil folks obviously knew of this, or had one, or that it wasn't a big deal. I would like to see a reference to one. Just one. From ANY of the names you mentioned.

Just one will do.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 11018
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26

Re: Has the danger of Peak Oil passed?

Unread postby AdamB » Fri 19 Feb 2016, 17:41:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', 'A')dam - "How in the world can you do your companies reserve estimates if you don't ever have to write down the price of oil you expect to get for your product....next year?” two different answers. First, public companies: you can pull up the SEC reserve reporting guidelines but eventually the pubcos will have outside auditors, using oil prices as DICTATED by the SEC, will calculate the company’s asset base. In addition to producing a lower revenue stream from a lower price a certain amount of reserves themselves will be removed from the count if they can’t be economically produced at the lower price.


So the SEC are the only folks capable, or allowed, to use forward looking statements when it comes to tomorrow's price expectations?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Rockman', '
')And the private companies like Rockman’s: we don’t write down reserves per se because we don’t have to tell anyone about our business. Except, of course, our bankers if they provide the company with its borrowing base. And the bankers have their own auditors do that analysis so they don’t really care what the company has to say about reserves.


So the value of your future revenue stream is estimated when you go to borrow against it? By the banks? Do they really have people who are good at this do you think?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Rockman', '
') So oddly were under as much pressure as those companies that are broke: if we can’t meet his goals we’re gone. My owner didn’t make $billions by funding failure. LOL.


A tough business indeed. My hat is off to you industry boys, for not only laying low the entire peak oil idea within a few years, but building up so much extra capacity and supply along the way that us regular consumers can motor around the country this summer for a song.

Image
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 11018
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26

Re: Has the danger of Peak Oil passed?

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Sat 20 Feb 2016, 00:13:12

Adam - It's not that the SEC is allowed to set the prices but demands that public companies use their pricing protocols. And there are no future pricing estimates as part of their rules. Some years ago pubcos were required BY LAW to use the closing price of oil on 31 Dec to project the future value of their reserves. Now they are using something more like a rolling average.

This is a big reason you're seeing pubcos posting huge "loses". If a pubco, in revaluing its reserves, decreases them by $1 BILLION that's part of what they are reporting as a loss. It's actually more complicated to explain here.

In my 40 years the most hard nosed and pessimistic deserve estimators were the ones working on behalf of the lending institutions. Typically not their employees but companies that specialize in this process. Like Ryder-Scott and Gruey. Trust me: no bank gives any validity to the numbers coming out of the pubcos. For many years a major part of my efforts was jousting with those consulting geologists and engineers. And I actually had developed a decent reputation for holding my own against them. I never lied or presented false data but I was very good at spinning "facts". LOL.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Has the danger of Peak Oil passed?

Unread postby AdamB » Sat 20 Feb 2016, 13:45:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', 'A')dam - It's not that the SEC is allowed to set the prices but demands that public companies use their pricing protocols. And there are no future pricing estimates as part of their rules. Some years ago pubcos were required BY LAW to use the closing price of oil on 31 Dec to project the future value of their reserves. Now they are using something more like a rolling average.


If you are making a NPV calculation for today, and using any value of production from tomorrow to do that, you are most certainly making an estimate of future price. No way to avoid it. So the SEC assumes that the price over the timespan of oil and gas reserves, often measured in decades, decide that it will be the same as today, or on Dec 31. Fine. They, like everyone else, are likely to be wrong. But that estimate must be made, for anything future looking, and reserves are all about future looking.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', '
')In my 40 years the most hard nosed and pessimistic deserve estimators were the ones working on behalf of the lending institutions. Typically not their employees but companies that specialize in this process. Like Ryder-Scott and Gruey. Trust me: no bank gives any validity to the numbers coming out of the pubcos. For many years a major part of my efforts was jousting with those consulting geologists and engineers. And I actually had developed a decent reputation for holding my own against them. I never lied or presented false data but I was very good at spinning "facts". LOL.


Keep up the good work!
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 11018
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26
Top

Re: Has the danger of Peak Oil passed?

Unread postby Revi » Fri 26 Feb 2016, 11:28:33

I don't think the danger of Peak Oil has passed. I think it's just beginning.

Here's the latest from Peak Oil Barrel:
http://peakoilbarrel.com/oil-price-and- ... more-11774

"2015 will be the year world production of crude oil peaked. The return of higher oil prices, whether later this year or further in the future, will not bring production back to the 2015 level." Ron Patterson from above.
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: Has the danger of Peak Oil passed?

Unread postby onlooker » Fri 26 Feb 2016, 11:56:25

I think this phrase is somewhat of an oxymoron. It is pretty evident that with the passing of time depletion becomes more of an issue.
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: Has the danger of Peak Oil passed?

Unread postby AdamB » Fri 26 Feb 2016, 19:02:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', 'I') don't think the danger of Peak Oil has passed. I think it's just beginning.

Here's the latest from Peak Oil Barrel:
http://peakoilbarrel.com/oil-price-and- ... more-11774

"2015 will be the year world production of crude oil peaked. The return of higher oil prices, whether later this year or further in the future, will not bring production back to the 2015 level." Ron Patterson from above.


Recycling ideas already discredited, in this case just between 2005 and now, have no more claim to being right than the last time the same ideas were applied, and failed.

Worse yet Ron was around during the great TOD peak oil scare of 2008, so not only are we talking about someone reusing methods that have failed in the past, but someone who was there while it was happening, and is now demonstrating only the inability to learn from past mistakes.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 11018
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26
Top

Re: Has the danger of Peak Oil passed?

Unread postby AdamB » Fri 26 Feb 2016, 19:06:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', 'I') think this phrase is somewhat of an oxymoron. It is pretty evident that with the passing of time depletion becomes more of an issue.


Thank goodness that economics incorporates both substitution and conservation, to be able to balance resources against each other, or stop using them altogether.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 11018
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26
Top

Re: Has the danger of Peak Oil passed?

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Fri 26 Feb 2016, 21:17:14

Adam - That's exactly the point: no one can predict future oil prices. Or, more precisely prices would be predicted based on a strong bias. Additionally there would never be a consensus. So no: a model of future prices is not allowed by the SEC used.

But companies, like the Rockman's, are free to run internal NPV calculations using any pricing forecast they choose. And in 40 years he has never seen any company stray far from the SEC protocol...if at all. The only exceptions have been slimey promoters trying to screw foolish investors. But more then one such conman has been convicted by the SEC of securities violation by pushing such "blue sky" reports to far.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Has the danger of Peak Oil passed?

Unread postby AdamB » Sat 27 Feb 2016, 12:29:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', 'A')dam - That's exactly the point: no one can predict future oil prices. Or, more precisely prices would be predicted based on a strong bias. Additionally there would never be a consensus. So no: a model of future prices is not allowed by the SEC used.


I wasn't really thinking about a model, just the idea that to create a NPV, some assumption of future price is required. So someone, in the case we are discussing the SEC, tells you what a future price is, and everyone has to use it to keep NPV calculations on a apples to apples comparison. Even if the rule is "just use the price on the last day of the year going forward", that is an assumption of future price.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', '
')But companies, like the Rockman's, are free to run internal NPV calculations using any pricing forecast they choose.


Of course. And who might the future price guessing specialist be at your company? Or do you just play scenario games, "hey Joe, plug $50/bbl in escalating 2% a year going forward and rerun those numbers for me"?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', '
')And in 40 years he has never seen any company stray far from the SEC protocol...if at all. The only exceptions have been slimey promoters trying to screw foolish investors. But more then one such conman has been convicted by the SEC of securities violation by pushing such "blue sky" reports to far.


Sure, but you are describing industry shenanigans. Promoters are as much a part of the industry and companies that can only survive in boom times.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 11018
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26
Top

Re: Has the danger of Peak Oil passed?

Unread postby Darian S » Tue 01 Mar 2016, 14:37:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AdamB', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', 'I') think this phrase is somewhat of an oxymoron. It is pretty evident that with the passing of time depletion becomes more of an issue.


Thank goodness that economics incorporates both substitution and conservation, to be able to balance resources against each other, or stop using them altogether.

At least for transportation, there is only so much conservation that can be made before seriously affecting the economy. People can't reduce the number of trips to and from work, supermarkets can't go without supplies, stores and restaurants need constant shipments to be able to operate.

Substitutes take time to implement, and it doesn't seem like the battery powered vehicles are ramping up fast enough, unless the oil resource problems are decades away.
Darian S
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon 29 Feb 2016, 16:47:02
Top

Re: Has the danger of Peak Oil passed?

Unread postby ralfy » Fri 04 Mar 2016, 18:23:41

The global economy is capitalist, which means increasing production and consumption rather than conservation, etc., as seen in real data across several decades for economic output, diminishing returns for resources, and so on:

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfre ... g-collapse
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland

Re: Has the danger of Peak Oil passed?

Unread postby AdamB » Fri 04 Mar 2016, 18:37:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Darian S', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AdamB', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', 'I') think this phrase is somewhat of an oxymoron. It is pretty evident that with the passing of time depletion becomes more of an issue.


Thank goodness that economics incorporates both substitution and conservation, to be able to balance resources against each other, or stop using them altogether.

At least for transportation, there is only so much conservation that can be made before seriously affecting the economy.


And if that effect is to decarbonize our transport, it is a GOOD serious effect on the economy.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Darian S', '
') People can't reduce the number of trips to and from work, supermarkets can't go without supplies, stores and restaurants need constant shipments to be able to operate.


One of the interesting points that HASN'T been discredited from the old Hirsch report, is that 50% of American driving around is discretionary. So you BETCHA they can reduce their use of liquid fuels in their random driving. And even better? Since the 2005 Hirsch report EV's were created by the auto manufacturers, and you, me and Mr McGee can trot on down to our local dealership and get one.

And the money we don't spent on liquid fuels can be spent on new iPhones, boozing it up at the local bar, or paying for sex. Sounds to me like its time to get out of ICE machines and each of us buy our own personal peak oil transport cure!

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DarianS', '
')
Substitutes take time to implement, and it doesn't seem like the battery powered vehicles are ramping up fast enough, unless the oil resource problems are decades away.

That was another point mentioned in the Hirsch report. The good news, again, is that with peak oil pushed off into the future (as estimated by those organizations that didn't fall for the last claims of peak oil, giving them some excellent credibility in this regard) we've got plenty of time to build out Tesla's superchargers, more EV charging stations all over the place, and these things are happening now!

Looks like at least in America, folks are on the ball, well in advance. The recent glut might slow down this buildout because when oil and gas is so cheap because of oversupply, people aren't going to be in any hurry to go even less expensive with EVs.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 11018
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26
Top

Re: Has the danger of Peak Oil passed?

Unread postby AdamB » Fri 04 Mar 2016, 18:45:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ralfy', 'T')he global economy is capitalist, which means increasing production and consumption rather than conservation, etc., as seen in real data across several decades for economic output, diminishing returns for resources, and so on:

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfre ... g-collapse


Depends on which of their arbitrary assumptions you like.

http://dieoffdebunked.blogspot.com/2009 ... ieoff.html
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 11018
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26
Top

Re: Has the danger of Peak Oil passed?

Unread postby Tanada » Fri 04 Mar 2016, 19:04:27

The danger of Peak Oil will have only passed when we have switched to power sources not dependent on finite and limited materials to sustain our civilization. I don't see a whole lot of movement in that direction.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Has the danger of Peak Oil passed?

Unread postby ennui2 » Fri 04 Mar 2016, 19:25:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'A')dam, dude, do you seriously want us to believe you read the Hirsch report? It never mentioned EV's. Didn't discuss consumer driving habits, discretionary or not. Was only concerned with manufactured liquid-fuel replacements.


All that says is that the opportunities for mitigation are that much larger now. Did it mention telecommuting, btw? If it didn't, so much more that can be done.
"If the oil price crosses above the Etp maximum oil price curve within the next month, I will leave the forum." --SumYunGai (9/21/2016)
User avatar
ennui2
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3920
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 10:37:02
Location: Not on Homeworld
Top

Re: Has the danger of Peak Oil passed?

Unread postby tita » Sat 05 Mar 2016, 05:34:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')is that 50% of American driving around is discretionary


So what? Less driving means less car manufacturing, less roads constructions. Transports, whatever their are used for, are actually the core of our economic expansion. As long as we rely on fossil fuels to make it work, it is in danger.

We can talk about telecommuting, robotization, automation and whatever replacing our actual transport-based economy, why not. It's still not reducing our transport thirst now, and the trend is still on the "more roads and more cars" actually.
User avatar
tita
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Fri 10 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron