by rockdoc123 » Wed 17 Feb 2016, 19:38:37
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hich is why it is utterly amazing that no peak oil analysis has ever used resource cost curves and demand curves to figure out the when, and at what cost, peak oil happens. Why were peakers of a decade ago misled, and by who, to ignore resource cost curves? Not a one...and no demand curve to match against it.
nonsense. Wood Mackenzie, IHS and a number of other groups all put together their analysis of forward production based on knowledge of plans from oil companies and governments, predicted prices, current technology etc. and have updated since 2005 or so. Back in 2005 or 2006 I posted on this site one forecast out to 2020 based on information from Wood Mackenzie (non public data) that included what was known about heavy oil and shale resource plays. The heavy oil predictions came out pretty accurately the shale predictions were off by quite a bit because back in 2005 we really did not know all the various shales that might produce nor how quickly break even costs could be dropped. The peak predicted I believe was somewhere between 2013 and 2015.
All such analyses automatically take into account resource cost simply because if it is not economic to produce it will not be produced (that is what goes into Wood Macs analyses). There are also numerous examples from back when the topic was very popular that projected demand forward as well. OPEC does this yearly which is why they are arguing the market will be balanced at some point (demand catches up with production).
Peakers (a stupid name as is Deniers or any other catch phrase used to put someone in a group offside of your own views) were not wrong about the issue....eventually we reach a point at which oil production levels out, the timing was problematic simply because many other things came into play which could not be included in a forecast (the economic collapse in 2008-09, rise of shale production, disruption in supply due to strife (Libya) or politics (Iran) etc). Way back when I suggested we would likely not see a sharp peak but rather a roller coaster plateau for this very reason, which I believe we are on.
I don't see why anyone would fixate on a particular prognostication date given the various unknowns. The fact of the matter is unless you believe in 1. abiotic oil and are hence an imbecile or 2. that within a couple of years time an alternative(s) to oil which is readily available and cheaper will become available, in which case you are an unrealistic dreamer then peak oil is a reality and should be a concern. One point to be made is that the amount of global shale oil is wildly exaggerated. As time progresses much of what was thought to be potential is proving up to be a bust (eg. Poland, Germany, Spain etc). There is not an infinite supply and with global demand still rising (as it is) the notion of peak oil remains a serious concept.
Calls from various pundits to "leave it in the ground" show an astounding lack of connection with reality. We can no longer suddenly stop using hydrocarbons than we can stop eating....well you could stop both, the outcome would not be pretty.