by Rod_Cloutier » Mon 25 Jan 2016, 19:24:53
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hey are either prepared to question the status quo belief in crap like 9/11 & the Apollo missions or they are not
As I said before, I'm 95% certain the Apollo missions were real, however there are some serious omissions and a credibility gap, whereas people are not allowed to question the official narrative. Whenever they ban a book, or a movie, or say 'You can't think that', then it's time to read the book, watch the film or take a deeper look into what someone else doesn't want you to see.
That we are ridiculed even for looking at, or discussing the claims people have made about the Apollo landing being faked is a warning sign. Science progresses through falsification. Whenever a scientist makes a bold claim, people immediately try to prove it wrong;
this is the scientific method. Let's look at each claim one by one, if we can't prove them wrong, then they are right and fact is established.
Some of the moon landing claims are ridiculous, aliens were involved, you can walk around on the moon without a spacesuit (Bill Cooper actually publicly made this claim), and so forth.
I'm with seagypsy here though that at least the first Apollo 11 event was staged, a fake psyops event to beat the Soviets to the moon. That the science advanced and we went their later, doesn't disprove that there is some dishonesty involved here. I'd rather know the truth, no matter how painful it is.