by Plantagenet » Fri 18 Dec 2015, 19:24:18
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GHung', 'P')lant said; " You'd last about 30 seconds waving "a big freakin sign" around in Tienamen Square---the Chinese military is everywhere there and so are the Chinese plainclothes security police."
Holy chit, Plant, you're as thick as a freakin' brick.
Holy chit, Ghung---You're the thickie who proposed to go to Tienamen Square and wave a "a big freakin sign" begging the Chinese not to build more coal-fired power plants.
I think we both now agree your idea was dumb---but you think seem to think that by saying something incredibly dumb you were being ironic.
I hate to break it to you but there is a difference between saying dumb things and being ironic.
For something to ironic, it (1) has to be in the context of a discussion and (2) it has to be humorous. But (1) there was no discussion at all about protests or going to China or waving protest signs or anything of the sort before you made your dumb statement and (2) your statement wasn't humorous but mocking, i.e. you proposed that I go to China and live out your dumb fantasy.----therefore your statement was not ironic.
For an example of irony, see my statement in italics above to you. Ironically, my statement actually is the ironic one, because (1) it IS very much in the context of your prior dumb statement--in fact its a direct response to you and (2) it is ever so slightly funny, which is as much as one can expect from irony which is one of the lowest forms of humor.
See the difference now?
PS: and do we need the name-calling? Are you going to claim your name-calling is ironic as well? Nope---its just more dumbness.
Here's a suggestion-----lets just discuss the issues and leave the dumb ideas and ad homs out of it, please?
cheers!