by ennui2 » Mon 16 Nov 2015, 11:12:49
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonoil', 'W')hen doomers wade into the waters of historical reality they are really neophytes in the field,
Sounds a lot like the ArchDruid here. Humans are pattern-matchers and this is can sometimes be good and sometimes lead to false associations. Seeing Jesus on toast is just an extreme example. But the everyday reality is doubling-down on some iron-clad prediction that turns out to be anything but certain. History doesn't always repeat itself in such a predictable way.
For instance, I knew the housing bubble would crash. I was reading the blog Housing Panic for years before it actually did crash. When it did crash, then, when doomers spiked the ball to claim it was actually a validation of peak oil, I was livid, because it was really due to the housing bubble. So we've been in this game of trying to establish cause and effect ever since, symbolized by Pstarr claiming that peak oil "caused" the credit crisis. In the end people see whatever they want to see when they interpret things. Blind men and the elephant, as it were.
I really am not moved by a bunch of charts and graphs because TOD, if nothing else, was a site full of charts and graphs and very "truthy" sorts of analysis like yours. And that analysis turned out to be WRONG. Again I will trot out their prediction that the NE would face a huge energy shortage due to a lack of natural gas. The people on TOD were not dumb. But they lacked the humility to realize they might have a blind spot, and projected themselves as experts. Now they're gone and individuals like Gail have gone on to try to gather acolytes once again using the same tactics. It's a fool me once, fool me twice Chicken Little situation.
Eventually someone's prediction will pan out, but along the way, lots of them will fail, perhaps also including yours.
"If the oil price crosses above the Etp maximum oil price curve within the next month, I will leave the forum." --SumYunGai (9/21/2016)