by C8 » Wed 30 Sep 2015, 18:35:17
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'I') don't get this thread. Jevon's Paradox is about energy, not dodge ball.
It was a little late that night and I was tired but had an idea that this whole tag ban idea might produce the opposite effect. I cast about my sleepy brain for a type of paradox that would be quickly recognizable by those versed in the Peak Oil literature and "Jevon's" came to mind for some reason. As I was falling asleep I realized it wasn't directly related and thought of editing but the computer was off and I was seeing unreal things (a sure sign dreams are coming). The next day I had to take my son to football in the morning and forgot about it.
Now that I think about it, there was a reason my tired brain choose Jevon's in the loose sense that it is one of those paradox types where, due to efficiency gains, you would expect less of something (consumption) but get more of it instead. So the restriction of touch (LESS), as in the tag ban, might produce MORE complaints and issues with touch.
yeah.... that it

!
Regarding Freshmen in college- it seems like we have a deep fear of challenging them. Students have a great power these days to really make a teacher or professors life miserable. As a result, it seems as though that course materials are being designed to be the least offensive and least controversial. The whole goal of college is to not challenge a person to look at their biases.
I wonder to if this will have an opposite effect of causing people to lash out at each other and try to deliberately offend others on non-college hours and as adults. In other words, is it better to have a supervised debate on controversial subjects so we can get to know differing views? If we don't, do we just see those we disagree with as alien and become more aggressive with them in non-supervised settings? Maybe making college safer is making society more explosive?