by onlooker » Mon 31 Aug 2015, 08:49:45
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', 'H')ypothetical game. You have a vial of a virulent pathogen. If you release it the worlds population will reduce to 200 million with no idea beforehand who will be spared. When you release that vial you know that most likely you and some or most or maybe all of your loved ones or kin may perish. Not releasing the vial means you live out your normal life span but there is a 99% that humans go extinct 100 years later due to catastrophic consequences. Do you release that vial? Or do you hold out for that 1% chance that we will save ourselves?
In keeping with what me and Newf were discussing. Interesting, that 1% chance complicates the matter. Then again what in life in truly 100% certain. Nevertheless, as you laid it out, it is quite clear, that the person who chooses not to release the vial is acting out of selfish motives and conversely the one who does is acting out of unselfish motives. Their should not be any grey area here for anybody.
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
-

onlooker
- Fission

-
- Posts: 10957
- Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
- Location: NY, USA
-
by Ibon » Mon 31 Aug 2015, 09:25:41
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', 'H')ypothetical game. You have a vial of a virulent pathogen. If you release it the worlds population will reduce to 200 million with no idea beforehand who will be spared. When you release that vial you know that most likely you and some or most or maybe all of your loved ones or kin may perish. Not releasing the vial means you live out your normal life span but there is a 99% that humans go extinct 100 years later due to catastrophic consequences. Do you release that vial? Or do you hold out for that 1% chance that we will save ourselves?
In keeping with what me and Newf were discussing. Interesting, that 1% chance complicates the matter. Then again what in life in truly 100% certain. Nevertheless, as you laid it out, it is quite clear, that the person who chooses not to release the vial is acting out of selfish motives and conversely the one who does is acting out of unselfish motives. Their should not be any grey area here for anybody.
It is that 1% that is the kicker and actually in real life this creates something called self serving moral ambiguity. Since we can never be certain of an outcome in the future, we actually justify not making the hard choices by holding on to the small 1% chance that everything will work out. This is less about hope and more of a rationalization since we are morally squeamish about taking hard choices. By holding on to irrational hope we release ourselves from having to make the morally uncomfortable rational decisions when it comes to self regulation, whether this be consumption or breeding. We dress up that 1% as morally self righteous. What are some examples?
1) Withholding food aid to severely overpopulated areas whose bio-regions for decades have been incapable of self sufficient food production. Note that this is different than food aid sent as a short term emergency due to a drought year or temporary war etc.
2) Providing life extension drugs and medicines beyond any reasonable doubt of recuperation on terminally ill patients.
3) Allowing immigrants in and setting a precedent for continual long term immigration in areas with chronic over population and instability.
4) Allowing religious institutions to continue doctrines of the freedom to breed in poor countries where clearly this policy increases the physical misery and spiritual poverty of the inhabitants.
You can come up with many examples, just look at the policies we enacted or refused to enact during the past 100 years in our failure at self regulation.
We dress up policies as moral and humanistic when actually they were comfortable rationalizations in order to avoid hard choices.
We are masters at rationalizing our way out of morally hard choices.
An unselfish veneer that hides a cowardice selfish core.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com