by Outcast_Searcher » Fri 31 Jul 2015, 15:34:02
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', '[')url=http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/section_prices.cfm]Here is EIAs wild ass guess[/url]

(This was put out in March, I don't really get why the high scenario starts back last year sometime? Does that mean the EIA doesn't know what is going on or the market doesn't?)
An EIA projection isn't going to predict swings, they like predictability (I can't figure out why they show little variations out 10 or 20 years as if they really know, they can't tell what is going to happen in the morning, LoL)
Pops, from the EIA reading I've done, their long term forecasts differing low/reference/high price scenarios are primarily about major factors like differing assumptions about underlying economic fundamentals over time. (Like price affecting both supply and demand, economic vitality affecting demand, etc).
Actually, I think the complete lack of price "squiggles" in the long term forecasts is refreshingly honest. They admit they don't know the details -- and at least they are documenting their basic methodology and major underlying assumptions (unlike the pundits here, including yours truly). And after all, basic components like Chindia demand will have a FAR larger impact on longer term prices than say, a given year's US inflation rate.
Not having gotten into the nitty gritty, I like you, am baffled at then starting the three projection lines from different starting dates (but no, I don't want to take the time to figure it out).
I know the EIA takes a lot of heat for their projections. But at least they're using more economics and science and definitions than a giant herd of broker/bankers and investment news letter writers).
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.