by PEAKINT » Sun 19 Jul 2015, 12:36:59
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', 'I') downloaded Origin of Species by Charles Darwin for .99 cents as an e-book and just finished reading it. It was 35 years since I read the book. What occurred to me this time around was how the observation of macro ecological phenomenon in the field lead Darwin to his theory of evolution and how natural sciences since his time have become more specialized and more micro down to the phylogenetic work on genes that determines evolutionary taxonomy today. Evolutionary biologists today rarely even go out into the field anymore and their level of specialization takes them far adrift from understanding the macro phenomenon of natural history. They know gene sequences but little of bio-geography for example.
I am guessing that this is also true in a suite of other fields from engineering to medicine to economics to sociology, etc. Specialization to the point that you can’t see the forest for the specialized tree you are perched on.
It is no wonder that we are so incapable of acting on the macro consequences of human overshoot when we live in a world of collective blind specialists so to speak. No one is steering the ship with a view of the broad horizon.
Reading original material from a couple hundred years ago really can provide insights into how far we have come at the same time as how far away we have drifted.
I thought this merited a thread of its own, the danger of becoming a bunch of short sighted mice focused on our minutiae where individuals and institutions can no longer act on macro consequences that are becoming more undeniable every day.
To open a discussion on this topic leads to the question, is this direction of specialization also one of those cyclical phenomenon that will one day swing back once we drift so far afield that consequences actually pull us back into the realm of the macro and holistic? Isn’t climate change one of those forces? Here we are 7 billion blind little mice specialized on our tasks as we do damage to the ultimate macro environment, our planet? Does this explain both the lack of collective will and blindness in being incapable of steering us toward mitigations. Or in finance the ever more sophisticated algorithms that go into moving a market and how this is taking us so far afield from a resilient economic system resulting in great disparity of wealth. Or how medicine is recently moving into specializing on the genetic level in offering tailor made therapies for the individual at exactly the time when the vast majority can no longer afford basic health care. It seems these are all examples of disparities and a weakening of collective resiliency that happens when there is over specialization.
Our species seems in exile and adrift in this specialized blindness.
It is the other way around. The human species is the most general, most abstract. We are neither the biggest, nor the strongest, nor the fastest or any other superlatives compared to other mammals. It was because of our lack of specialization that enabled us to become what we are today.
By specialization you really mean cognitively in the neocortex.