Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Packin' it in...so much for P.O. planning

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Packin' it in...so much for P.O. planning

Postby pea-jay » Wed 29 Jun 2005, 23:29:55

I have come to a conclusion. I need to move. Peak Oil planning is futile here and I am having serious doubts that even if I could get my work to seriously consider this issue (which makes sense, given my job in the LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION. As it is, energy is considered a non issue. But my decision was driven by more than just my backwards looking place of employment.

Here are the strikes against where I live (Central California, south of Fresno):

1. It is over populated and growing too fast. Plain and simple, the demographics of this area scare me. Even though I live in what is considered rural in california terms, by non-CA terms it is still crowded. My county, is home to nearly 400K people and growing rapidly. What's worse is the population distribution indicates that a sizable portion of the population has YET to enter the child bearing age. Plus due to our relative inexpensive cost of living, thousands more are flocking to us each year.

2. Despite this county being larger than the state of Connecticut, most people are jammed into the North-western 20% of the county. The bulk of the land is occupied by 10K foot mountains.

3. Water. It only rains on average 8 inches of rain a year. This year was exceptionally wet and we got 16. The only way we grow crops and can take showers is by pumped groundwater and winter runoff. Run off is unpredictable (great this year, lousy the next) while the aquifer is being drawn down by excessive pumping (which is of course electrically powered). The remaing water is pumped in from N. of Yosemite park via canals. Post peak the water delivery system is bleak. Already, water district operators are fretting over the increased electrical costs to pump an ever declining water table.

4. Socio economics. They suck. This area has been importing "migrant" workers for farm work ever since the turn of the twentieth century. First displaced blacks from the south, then poor white Okies during the 20s-40's and since then Mexicans. Guess what? Most never migrated away when they finished farm laboring. Each new resident has pushed this area away from it's theoretical carrying capacity. And since there always a surplus in labor (Farm owners INSIST on CHEAP farm help) wages are hideously low here as is educational attainment, and other socioeconomic standards. The best and brightest leave after highschools. The rest linger in poverty. Before anyone gets the bright idea to blame the Mexicans for this, remember, this area imported poor from the southern and other western states for decades. WHen the SHTF there will be alot of disgruntled POOR people with nothing to loose. Of the 400K that live here, close to 100K are desperately poor or close to that point. Not good at all.

5. Climate. It gets up to 100 each summer. Thats the average. 110 is not unheard of. Without AC or water that is dangerous. Most houses are not designed for passive cooling strategies.

6. Transportation. You need a car to get around. All construction is oriented towards vehicular transportation. The building lobby is against anything other than SF homes, cos they make more money off of them.

7. Food. You'd think in an area known for food production this wouldn't be a problem. But it is. Most crops grown are cash crops grown for export (domestic or internationally). THe farms are mostly corporate run affairs while the county leadership considering the passage of a PRO-GMO ordinance as a solution to our (perceived) agricultural problems. Only 1000 odd acres in this county are organic. Thats out of over 1 million acres in production. But it gets worse. Most food here is sent to Los Angeles or the Bay area for "processing" before being shipped back. Yikes.

8. Politics. This area is run by backwards looking conservative types. The average populace (that are not desperately poor) expect that the free market will solve all of the problems or that God will rapture them away, like the Left Behind novels. I am not kidding. I work with planners that have the same philosophy as James Watt (Regan's disgraced secratary of the Interior)

9. Policy. Build build build. Growth solves problems is too often the solution persued. Recently there was an isssue with a community that has significant sewer problems. As a way to solve this problem, consideration was given to allowing more residents "so that the new residents could provide extra income to pay for the improvements" Our largest city considers it good when it is growing by 4% a year and is forced to open a new school each year.

10. Leadership. Head firmly stuck in the sand. Can't say it enough. The elected officials do NOT want to consider limits to growth and the official planning department's position is NOT to plan for ENERGY as an issue until it is a crisis. As one planner said in a public forum today. "We're planners. We do not consider energy a limitation. When areas develop, the electricty and gas will always be provided by the utilities in cordination with the developers." Then to top it off, I have been instructed to stay quiet on the matter. Read more here from my blog on this subject.

This place is fucked. Maybe not as badly as Los Angeles or Phoenix but fucked no less. I thought maybe advanced planning and activism could work, but the problems too fundemental (carrying capacity) or unmovable (leadership).

So that is why I have decided to pack it in. Time to find a cooler, wetter, less populated area with a more level-headed approach to these issues. Plus, my wife is a certified teacher and can teach in almost any location where there is an opening (secondary ed). My goal now is to relocate my family while I still can. I owe that to my kids. I didn't help bring them into the world only to die a miserable death in a hell hole destined for self-inflicted destruction.

So sorry folks, if you were hoping for some example of some jurisdiction discussing or planning for peak oil in a rational manner. It won't happen here and I will not be the instigator of this discussion.

I tried...
Now I gotta look out for those important to me.

I hope you understand
Last edited by pea-jay on Wed 29 Jun 2005, 23:59:39, edited 1 time in total.
UNplanning the future...
http://unplanning.blogspot.com
User avatar
pea-jay
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1547
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: NorCal

Postby PenultimateManStanding » Wed 29 Jun 2005, 23:44:15

Good luck pea-jay. I've read your posts about dealing with your department with great interest. I wonder myself if there really is anyplace that's safe.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Packin' it in...so much for P.O. planning

Postby smallpoxgirl » Wed 29 Jun 2005, 23:54:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pea-jay', 'S')o that is why I have decided to pack it in. Time to find a cooler, wetter, less populated area


Sucks. Good luck with everything.

As for cooler and wetter, there's the less populated parts of Western Washington and Oregon. Maybe be grey and moldy and never see the sun, but it is definitely cooler and wetter. The solstice was over a week ago and we're still waiting for the sun to come out. (Actually I'm exagerating a bit. It was out for a couple of hours this afternoon.)

Personally I'm looking for someplace a bit wilder and with real weather. Off to Montana in a little over a month.
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Postby MicroHydro » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 01:10:29

pea-jay ,

I lived in California over 30 years and know Fresno County well. I agree with everything you said. Move!

If you are a white heterosexual Christian man and don't mind Jeb Bush and redneck culture, northwest (Swannee river area) Florida peninsula has cheap land and lots of it. Homes can be bought for under $100k and land can be bought for under $5k per acre. I grew up there but left at age 17 because of the stupidity and fundamentalist theocracy. But it is very pretty. No shortage of sun or rain. Lakes, rivers, springs, fruit trees. Plenty of game - fish, gator, armadillos, opossum, boar, deer, rabbits, turtles. You might go crazy but you wouldn't dry up or starve.

Best Wishes
"The world is changed... I feel it in the water... I feel it in the earth... I smell it in the air... Much that once was, is lost..." - Galadriel
User avatar
MicroHydro
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun 10 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Postby Ayoob » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 01:15:09

Portland baby, Portland.
User avatar
Ayoob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1520
Joined: Thu 15 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Postby I_Like_Plants » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 01:36:27

Yeah I think you really have to look at places where you're gonna have water no matter what, gonna have something to eat no matter what even if it's something yukky like armadillo or porcupine or skunk or crawdads. That pretty much points to the sweaty armpits of the country like the bayou, the foresty swampy places, which means places in the southeast or the northwest, or more temperate/dry areas where there's for-sure good water, no heroic well-drilling needed. Fortunately, a lot of those places aren't well-tamed enough for property values to be high, so a place to skedaddle to will cost less.

Or Portland, baby!
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Postby Colorado-Valley » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 01:48:48

I was on a long-range planning committee here in western Colorado that proposed "clustered" villages in the open areas of our orchard and ranch county. We thought they could be connected in the future by bicycle and hiking paths between farms.

After the private-property activists got finished with it, the county dropped land-use planning altogether and adopted exurban sprawl as its model.

The clusters could have become self-sufficient little communities in a peak-oil scenario; instead we've just got rural sprawl and lots more traffic.

Oh well, we tried!
User avatar
Colorado-Valley
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 729
Joined: Mon 16 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Packin' it in...so much for P.O. planning

Postby Raxozanne » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 02:56:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pea-jay', ' ')My goal now is to relocate my family while I still can. I owe that to my kids. I didn't help bring them into the world only to die a miserable death in a hell hole destined for self-inflicted destruction.


That is really honourable.

I wish my parents thought like that.

But no, they have finally grasped PO and instead of doing anything proactive have adopted the 'roll-over and die' attitude which according to them will probably 'be better for everyone'.
Raxozanne
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 945
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Re: Packin' it in...so much for P.O. planning

Postby Doly » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 04:48:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Raxozanne', '
')I wish my parents thought like that.

But no, they have finally grasped PO and instead of doing anything proactive have adopted the 'roll-over and die' attitude which according to them will probably 'be better for everyone'.


That means they're still in denial. Nobody who isn't seriously depressed would seriously take that attitude. If they say that, it means they don't really believe it's going to happen.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Postby Grimnir » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 04:58:32

The Great Lakes area has all the fresh water a person could ever want, and lots of fish too. Sure, they have mercury in them, but if you're reduced to foraging for a living, I imagine that will be the least of your worries. Winter cold is a problem, but it's a solvable one.
Grimnir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 851
Joined: Mon 04 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: USA

Postby Pops » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 09:10:25

Good luck PJ, you did your best.

Central Ca once was a great place; I lived most of my life there.

I don’t miss it.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Postby RiverRat » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 12:00:56

Hey … you can move to Rural Appalachia (were I live).

<sarcasm on>

You can get yourself a nice 1,700 sf doublewide on 5 acres for about $85k. You can travel miles without seeing another soul.

It rains every other day and you would definitely be the brightest bulb in the pack. It doesn’t take much to get used to the redneck mentality. Rub some cheap snuff, drink some busch beer, get a lot of craftsman tools and mount a gun rack in your beat up ’88 F-150. Oh … and don’t forget your camo nascar hat.

Heck … I’m sure all the mines will go ‘great guns’ hiring when we start to liquefy coal. Nothing like spending 10 hrs a day in a dank dark hole with 200 of your union brethren.

<Sarcasm off>

Really … you could make a killing on a move to an area similar to the one described above.
If ...'If's' and 'But's' ... were Candy and Nuts ... we would all be happy and fat !
RiverRat
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed 16 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Postby bobaloo » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 12:21:09

Pea-jay, I work as a Planner in Oregon, there's always openings up this way. Pay's probably not what you're used to, typically 40-50K and good benefits, but pace of life and work is slower and better.

Check out www.orcities.org for their classified section, I know of several openings around the state at the moment.

It's sunny and 72 degrees at the moment, summer in the NW can't be beat.
User avatar
bobaloo
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 468
Joined: Thu 14 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Postby holmes » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 13:58:58

Truth in all you say peajay. But please if u are going to move on up to the NW. your fellow californicators and other "immigrants" plus the ass wipe backwards capitalists we have up here are making the GNW another california. So please doo not build a filthy mcmansion and act like a pOS cali boy. blend in with the "tribal" folks. we need more of you to wage the war that will be inevitable up here. Too much liberal bring em all in mentality is destroying the last vestiges of a sustainable infrastructure. There will be alot of bloodshed up here in the NW, Montana, etcc.. So dont bring california. The filthy greedy scumbags need to be shot as soon as they step over the border. Bring intelligence we need it badly. I work in a planning department too as a GIS analyst. small town. Come on up.
I ride my bike everywhere, to work, everyway period.
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Postby Eli » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 14:49:44

If you are serious about moving. Then the "Portland Baby" idea is the worst.

Holmes alluded too the problem with the GNW. The GNW has water and abundant resources Ca does not. When PO hits everyone who can in Ca is going to head to the best place they know....the GNW.

Go to the Florida Panhandle head to the Appalachians. Go some where they have never seen a Starbucks. Go some where a Ca wouldn't be caught dead. The boondocks are going to be a better place to be than the costs.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Postby holmes » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 15:43:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Eli', 'I')f you are serious about moving. Then the "Portland Baby" idea is the worst.

Holmes alluded too the problem with the GNW. The GNW has water and abundant resources Ca does not. When PO hits everyone who can in Ca is going to head to the best place they know....the GNW.

Go to the Florida Panhandle head to the Appalachians. Go some where they have never seen a Starbucks. Go some where a Ca wouldn't be caught dead. The boondocks are going to be a better place to be than the costs.

the old retired fucks are moving in as well, each couple with their little white poodle "needs" a monstrous house built in prime wild land, cleared land, big cars, huge amounts of drugs, etc.. Clearing out rural counties for their last days on this earth. I hate them. They then complain and whine about too many poeple moving into "their" space. I would like to sterr the criminals and anarchists over to them. and when the time comes i will. since i have access to all their data. they are a huge vacuum of energy and resources. keep these worhtless walking dead propped up for more glutonous years. I hate these greedy selfish aholes. Sadly the war will be terrible. But the NW is better off than 95% of the country. sucking primew habitat up and consuming the land that can sequester carbon. fucks.
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Postby smallpoxgirl » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 19:09:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('holmes', ' ')the old retired fucks are moving in as well


No kidding. There's all these "over 55" trailer parks around here. Old people lined up in boxes waiting to die. It's creepy.

There's lots of them in Montana to, but I figure they won't last too long when they have to start chopping wood to heat their houses.
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Postby PenultimateManStanding » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 19:27:15

Old people waitng to die. How about young people lining up to be cannon fodder? The human race is vertically organized on the money paradigm. Now old folks worked hard to get their benefits. There is no justice in pushing them into the grave. My beloved old mom is in a retirement double-wide trailer park in the rural northern part of the county. They have their own tennis courts, pool, and 9 link golf course. She's 80 years old, very healthy and still drinks bourbon every night. A humane society honors the elders.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Postby smallpoxgirl » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 21:31:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'O')ld people waitng to die. How about young people lining up to be cannon fodder?


Agreed. I think the problem is the fragmentation of the community and the extended family. Not that I begrudge the seniors their trailer park. Just seems like a terrifically morbid way to live.

Put up a gate to keep out all those youngsters. Need some more restrictive covenants. Wouldn't want any children living here.

Aging and death have their place in life, but you concentrate them all in one place and it's just creepy. Feel the same way about nursing homes. Old people sitting around drooling on themselves waiting to die. Because they've lost their conection to the community, they have no function, no role. Should be sharing what they've learned with the youngsters. Telling the stories. Should have an honored place in the community. Instead they have a health aide that gets paid $7 per hour to change their diapers. We treat our elders the same way we treat our children. They can't work, so we jam hundreds of them off in a building somewhere where they won't get in the way.
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests