Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

$$ oil == bad?

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

$$ oil == bad?

Postby cube » Wed 29 Jun 2005, 23:00:07

It's a common belief that high oil prices == a lose. Perhaps a more accurate question would be a lose to whom? Extra money spent buying more expensive oil doesn't fall into a black hole. Somebody gets paid...and in this case it's the oil exporting nations. With that said the rise in oil prices can more accurately be viewed as a transfer of wealth rather then a net lose.....so long as it doesn't get so high that demand destruction sets in.

I doubt that's any comfort to many people here since I'm assuming most of us are from oil importing, not exporting nations. But where does the extra money go? OPEC does not manufacture consumer products like T-shirts, cars, and computers. They import it. In other words, oil exporting nations import just about all of their consumer products from oil importing nations.

However there is one nation that is in a very specially advantageous position....the USA. Oil is sold in US dollars. So the more expensive oil gets the greater the demand for US dollars will be. This will allow the US to keep interest rates low and to continue the super easy credit bubble.

In the short run high oil prices will be good for the US because it keeps intrest rates low and therefore it delays the housing bubble from popping.

But of course as we know the longer a buble is sustained the greater the fallout when it finally does pop.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Postby Eli » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 00:26:18

I think that PO is more accurately described this way.

It is not high oil prices that is the problem with PO it is

not enough oil for demand = decline

In the short term high oil prices will mean a transfer of wealth. But demand destruction in this case does not merely mean people do not buy as much gas. It means the economic system that allows the people to buy the gas is destroyed as well.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Postby MicroHydro » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 01:31:41

Even better would be very high taxes on fossil fuels, with the proceeds spent domestically. to build a post carbon infrastructure
"The world is changed... I feel it in the water... I feel it in the earth... I smell it in the air... Much that once was, is lost..." - Galadriel
User avatar
MicroHydro
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun 10 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Postby Raxozanne » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 03:09:39

Everytime oil prices go up it is reported that stock indicators fall (or something along those lines) I'm not sure what it means but the economists go on about it like it's a bad thing.
Raxozanne
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 945
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Postby energyaddict » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 04:15:49

MicorHydro wrote: $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')ven better would be very high taxes on fossil fuels, with the proceeds spent domestically. to build a post carbon infrastructure


That is exactly what European Gouvernments are doing for years now. There allways was and is a lot of moaning in the public, but I think in the long run Europe is better off. People getting used to high fuel prices and there have been conservation efforts over decades now. Europe today has a far less per capita energy comsumption as the US of A with comparable wealth. The impact of the comming prices spikes therefore will hit Europe not that hard.
To realize that you are an addict is a essential step to a basic change.
User avatar
energyaddict
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 92
Joined: Thu 28 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Germany

Re: $$ oil == bad?

Postby Doly » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 04:35:26

I understand little of economy, but enough to realise that your reasoning is faulty on several points.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', 'W')ith that said the rise in oil prices can more accurately be viewed as a transfer of wealth rather then a net lose.....so long as it doesn't get so high that demand destruction sets in.


There is demand destruction every time the oil goes higher. A price is set when the number of people willing to buy at that price equals the number of people willing to sell at that price. When prices go higher, the poorest people stop buying at that price. You may not have noticed any demand destruction in rich countries, but there certainly has been in poor countries.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '
')But where does the extra money go? OPEC does not manufacture consumer products like T-shirts, cars, and computers. They import it. In other words, oil exporting nations import just about all of their consumer products from oil importing nations.


But they'll be importing more from some countries than others, and not necessarily the ones that buy more oil will get the most demand from the OPEC. They'll be buying stuff from China, for example. Again, it's redistribution of wealth, but maybe not in directions you are happy about.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '
')However there is one nation that is in a very specially advantageous position....the USA. Oil is sold in US dollars. So the more expensive oil gets the greater the demand for US dollars will be. This will allow the US to keep interest rates low and to continue the super easy credit bubble.


That has been US policy so far. But dollars are becoming less and less desirable since the dollar is falling. There has been a lot of talk of changing this situation of trading oil only in dollars. Iraq, in fact, was the first country to sell oil in euros. And Russia keeps talking about trading in euros.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '
')But of course as we know the longer a buble is sustained the greater the fallout when it finally does pop.


That's the point, and now you understand the situation is far from good and the bubble could burst anytime soon.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Postby CARVER » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 09:26:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('energyaddict', 'M')icorHydro wrote: $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')ven better would be very high taxes on fossil fuels, with the proceeds spent domestically. to build a post carbon infrastructure


That is exactly what European Gouvernments are doing for years now. There allways was and is a lot of moaning in the public, but I think in the long run Europe is better off. People getting used to high fuel prices and there have been conservation efforts over decades now. Europe today has a far less per capita energy comsumption as the US of A with comparable wealth. The impact of the comming prices spikes therefore will hit Europe not that hard.


Isn't this what companies are doing all the time. You take the lifespan of a machine for example and each year you put money aside so that you can replace the machine at the end of its lifespan, so that you can keep doing in the future what you are doing now. (Less risk of going into practices that are not sustainable)

However I'm not sure if the tax on fuel is actually going into research (or is set aside to pay) for a replacement. It seems to me we made a mistake and got the lifespan wrong (too short), and so the tax was not high enough. I think it would be a good idea to increase the fuel tax (worldwide), so we can have a smoother transition. The public will moan about it, because they don't understand or get told why it is done, or only care about now, not the future....yet.
User avatar
CARVER
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu 19 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Holland
Top

Postby Rochester » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 10:26:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')owever there is one nation that is in a very specially advantageous position....the USA. Oil is sold in US dollars. So the more expensive oil gets the greater the demand for US dollars will be. This will allow the US to keep interest rates low and to continue the super easy credit bubble.


Actually it is likely to be the other way around. Many large importing nations of oil (China, Japan, S Korea) are huge holders of US debt. We have been a giant piggy bank for them. They will be selling this debt to finance their oil consumption which will drive up interest rates in the US. Any additional demand for dollars will push up the value of the dollar and push down exports. We get a double wammy.
User avatar
Rochester
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon 20 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Postby Eli » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 11:29:11

There is no way around inflation for the US and the rest of the world. Oil is the main driver of price for the world economy. When oil goes up in price the cost for doing business goes up.

and correspondingly as the US buying power goes down and consumer confidence tumbles with rising costs the world economy goes with it. China will be sucking hind teat without US consumers snatching up there cheap goods. China has seen a ton of outside money being invested from US companys looking to cut costs, it will not look so good once the US stops consuming as much.

Europe will fare no better with high taxes. Europe has chosen high taxes to pay for more social services for there people rather than the US model of lower taxes and more entrepreneurial growth. Europe economy is tied to the US they may suffer less in some respect to peak oil but the economic impact of peak oil will not spare them.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Re: $$ oil == bad?

Postby jimmydean » Thu 30 Jun 2005, 12:52:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '
')However there is one nation that is in a very specially advantageous position....the USA. Oil is sold in US dollars. So the more expensive oil gets the greater the demand for US dollars will be. This will allow the US to keep interest rates low and to continue the super easy credit bubble.

In the short run high oil prices will be good for the US because it keeps intrest rates low and therefore it delays the housing bubble from popping.

But of course as we know the longer a buble is sustained the greater the fallout when it finally does pop.


Recycled petrodollars keeping the dollar up I agree with.

We are in unique time where we have deflationary pressures due to cheaper foreign goods/services as well as some inflationary due to oil. I actually think inflationary pressure will be short-lived since poorer nations will begin rationing and we will see more conservation in the west creating more oil slack.

IMHO deflation is the real 1-5 year concern.

Productivity (produce more with less) increasing + population increasing + jobs going east fast (cheaper foreign goods putting western companies out of business, lower wages in west due to foreign competition) is the foundation for deflation imho.

What could throw us head first into deflation would be a significant housing bubble pop, ripple effect of large bankrupcies (airlines while oil is high,Ford?), drop in confidence in the dollar etc.

A simple way I think of it is that in a global economy the standard of living of previously poor nations cannot exponentially increase without causing the exact opposite effect in the richer nations. We are forced to compete $ wise with these nations to produce goods/services thereby causing shrinkage (bankrupcy) and lower wages in our local markets. The only way around it is if we discover and become leaders in creating new important goods/services that these other nations can't. Biotechnology, semiconductor and a few other areas come to mind but I don't know if it will be enough to save the western standard of living. Until itrade laws are passed to lessen the velocity of these changes I think we will continue to move to deflation.
User avatar
jimmydean
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu 05 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top


Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron