Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

to believe or not to believe that is the question

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: to believe or not to believe that is the question

Postby Pops » Mon 30 Mar 2015, 17:54:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Timo', 'I')'m not sure i quite understand what you're getting at. Could you provide more insight to your cosmic utters?


Image
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: to believe or not to believe that is the question

Postby Newfie » Mon 30 Mar 2015, 18:36:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'a')t some point one should address morality as having an objective basis rather than just subjective.

Well, that's interesting. Ayn Rand made that exact point in her 1957 Magnum Opus, "Atlas Shrugged". Naturally, the far left redistibutionist class hated her all the more for it, for calling them out on the "we're good because we whine and cry for "change", but the comapnies that produce things people want and need (for "greedy" profit) are bad.

And here we are 58 years later, and for the most part, the redistributionist left is more popular, and still produces ... wait for it .... a constant cry for more wealth redistribution and more taxes -- as long as it favors THEIR agenda and hits the people THEY don't like, of course.

So those like Ayn Rand and me who would argue, for example, that just whining about Monsanto (one of the four most hated corporations in the world), for actually doing something about global hunger and for a PROFIT yet, and wants farmers to actually pay for the Monsanto seeds they crave -- may be lots of "fun", but until the whiner class actually does something meaningful about world hunger -- why again is it that the productive class should actually take them seriously?

And by the way, there are plenty of laws, regulations, and regulators which Monsanto has to deal with, so it's no like they get to do whatever they want for "evil" profits, but let's not talk about THAT. :roll:


Funny, I read the same book and came away with a very different take on it. (re: Monsanto, not the other bit about objective morality, that I get.) Not the typical Left or Right takes. I liked a lot of what she said and could never understand the various other interpretations.

But I read her many decades ago when I was still a teenager. And I read Moby Dick too, but only the good parts about whaling, the wailing bit was boring and nonsensical! :lol:
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: to believe or not to believe that is the question

Postby onlooker » Mon 30 Mar 2015, 18:50:46

I actually also read parts of the books by Ayn Rand as my sister go into her. I came away with a train of thought which to this day I remember vividly. That is that she is heartless and cold as a fish. Her philosophy seemed to amount to rejoice in your selfishness for it is what makes the world go around. I wonder if she would think that if she were lets say born in some poor African country around the year 2000 or so. Old enough to comprehend that "boy I am forlorn".
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: to believe or not to believe that is the question

Postby Timo » Mon 30 Mar 2015, 19:07:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Timo', 'I')'m not sure i quite understand what you're getting at. Could you provide more insight to your cosmic utters?


Image

OHHHHHH!!!!! I am so moooooooved by that! Cosmic, indeed! And I haven't even started by evening peyote, yet.
Timo
 
Top

Re: to believe or not to believe that is the question

Postby Newfie » Mon 30 Mar 2015, 19:18:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', 'I') actually also read parts of the books by Ayn Rand as my sister go into her. I came away with a train of thought which to this day I remember vividly. That is that she is heartless and cold as a fish. Her philosophy seemed to amount to rejoice in your selfishness for it is what makes the world go around. I wonder if she would think that if she were lets say born in some poor African country around the year 2000 or so. Old enough to comprehend that "boy I am forlorn".


For whatever reason, and against the current, I saw her differently. The scene that sticks in my head is near the end of Atlas Shrugged, she and (Reardon?) are fleeing to the West. They stop in a WV coal mining town and she describes a young woman, a mother, who is on hard luck, and how it is their responsibility to do the right thing, so that such folks can lead a reasonable life.

In my mind, and it undoubtedly a minority view, AS was about the terror of bureaucracy, and the responsibility of the gifted to care for others.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean
Top

Re: to believe or not to believe that is the question

Postby onlooker » Mon 30 Mar 2015, 19:39:41

At least Newfie you ground this view in seeing a goodness and a humanity to her. Now if you said you liked the fact that she was heartless and felt all people should be this or do this regardless of circumstances and if not they are worthless and that selfishness is the highest of virtues then I would have to say ummmm
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: to believe or not to believe that is the question

Postby Pops » Mon 30 Mar 2015, 21:49:22

Rand-y self-interest is justification for the "we built it" crowd to pretend their morals are actually as well developed as the average 20 year old - which is about the age most folks mature past Rand.

Actually the liberals in the universities who get all the grants to study such stuff say that self-interest is normal, until you reach maybe 6 or 7 when you begin to develop empathy. Teenagers though sometimes fantasize it would be great if they could just bump off the blue hairs and take their stuff, or maybe that a big slate wiper would come along and do the bumping, that would be objectivism at its finest, LOL

Rand's family lost all their stuff to the Commies in RU, can't blame her for being bitter about that whole notion. Strangely it was the inspiration for her to preach that capitalism should be just as brutal, except instead of the State, who the citizenry might be able to exercise at least some control over, it should be some self perpetuating plutocracy — "if you can't exploit or profit from 'em, piss on 'em" might be their motto and the birdfinger their secret salute.

No doubt capitalism is the better economic program than communism and central planning from the standpoint of figuring out how much of what should be available when at what price. Ditto innovation and certainly inventive resource extraction and disposal, there we excel. I can't guess but it seems like capitalism is a more fulfilling lifestyle too, at least as I have experienced it — even not including the confiscation part.

Of course if anyone thinks an idyllic, unregulated "free market" would be actually free they are way more deluded than any bleeding heart socialist, LOL. The only perfect market to an Objectivist would be one where he is in complete control, a monopoly in other words, if no one else can compete then screw 'em, I win, off to the Gulch!

That is what I think is funny about Randians, they all see themselves as the 5 or 10 people who bugged out to Galt's gulch, never as the sycophants who obediently voted the ownership's party line (against their own interest) yet in the end were left behind like all the rest of the useless eaters when JG and his pals cashed out the employee retirement fund and jetted. Ah, poor Randian Wannabes with their nose pressed against the bakery glass mumbling, 'let em eat cake...'

LOL, that cracked me up...

I'm not a redistributionist per sey, I don't want to tax the rich man so I can take his money and give it to someone else, I just don't want him to be able to use it against me or to take advantage of me, or harm me with it. No different than, say, my neighbor having guns, I don't care if he has guns, but I don't want everyone in the neighborhood to have high explosives in their basement and a .50 in the attic dormer either.


Oops, there goes another rather long narrative. :oops:
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: to believe or not to believe that is the question

Postby Ibon » Mon 30 Mar 2015, 23:57:31

When I graduated from the uni I spent about 5 years hitchhiking around North America (including Mexico) and doing extensive wilderness trips. 600km canoe trip on the Churchill River in Northern Saskatchewan was my ultimate expedition. Well, those years embedded in me a confidence because I saw everything afterwards in the world of society as a farce. I fully distrusted and held in disdain corporations, governments and churches. I knew a truth deep in the wilderness that surpassed anything created by human societies. It is what helped make me successful afterwards when I did enter into business because I had no ego invested in it because I recognized it all as BS anyway.

My conclusion in the topic of this thread is don't believe any of it. It's all BS.

The problem I recognize with time is that I was never a real participant in society. I was always on the outside looking in. It was the source of my strength and success but it also made me feel in exile to my fellow men. That is why it was so easy for me to create the concept of Kudzu Ape but it also explains my misanthropic tendencies.

There is a price you pay from the objectivity you gain from going deep in the wilderness. I accept that price.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron