Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Breaking point $10/gal. gas minimum

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Postby fletch961 » Mon 27 Jun 2005, 06:08:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')ome on, people. Gas here is already at $6 (euro 1.25 per liter) and everybody keep driving alone like always. People don't even TALK about it. They don't give a blink over price at $6.


The US drives 10,000 miles per capita (40,000 miles for a family of four) using cars that average 20 mpg. That's 2,000 gallons a year for a family of four. A dollar rise in gas prices costs an average family in US $2,000. At $6 a gallon, that family would be seriously affected to the tune of $12,000 a year.

The UK drives a little over 4,000 miles per capita (16,300 miles for a family of four) using cars that average around 31 mpg. A dollar rise in gas prices only affects them a quarter as much. Gas would have to go to $22.80 a gallon to cost the average family in UK the same $12,000 a year.

American diving habits and family budgets have evolved around a premise of $1 - $2 gas. While because of the gas taxes in Europe their driving habits and budgets already reflect $5+ gas.


US Driving Habits
User avatar
fletch961
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun 05 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Postby I_Like_Plants » Mon 27 Jun 2005, 07:02:50

I can see people setting up informal car-sharing networks, people who have workplaces or living places that are near each other etc.

My SUV gets 25MPG and I do 7k miles a year, I'm still going to sell the sucker though.

The original poster makes a good point though, people-miles per gallon really shoot up when you carry more than one person per car.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Postby Barbara » Mon 27 Jun 2005, 07:18:46

My city (Rome, Italy) has the most amazing car rate in the world (990 cars per 1000 inhabitants!!!) So I am really surprised to see a lot of people going by bycicle these days. Most of them are immigrants or students or German tourists :lol: , but anyway it's not usual... maybe something is changing.
**no english mothertongue**
--------
Objects in the rear view mirror
are closer than they appear.
Barbara
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1121
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Zoorope

Postby CARVER » Mon 27 Jun 2005, 08:40:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('fletch961', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')ome on, people. Gas here is already at $6 (euro 1.25 per liter) and everybody keep driving alone like always. People don't even TALK about it. They don't give a blink over price at $6.


The US drives 10,000 miles per capita (40,000 miles for a family of four) using cars that average 20 mpg. That's 2,000 gallons a year for a family of four. A dollar rise in gas prices costs an average family in US $2,000. At $6 a gallon, that family would be seriously affected to the tune of $12,000 a year.

The UK drives a little over 4,000 miles per capita (16,300 miles for a family of four) using cars that average around 31 mpg. A dollar rise in gas prices only affects them a quarter as much. Gas would have to go to $22.80 a gallon to cost the average family in UK the same $12,000 a year.

American diving habits and family budgets have evolved around a premise of $1 - $2 gas. While because of the gas taxes in Europe their driving habits and budgets already reflect $5+ gas.


US Driving Habits


In those calculations you only look at the miles you drive yourself. What does it come down to when you also look at the miles driven to transport all the goods, that the family consumes, to the local stores (so basically all the oil used in the entire production & delivery process)? Doen anyone know where I would be able to find those numbers?
User avatar
CARVER
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu 19 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Holland

Postby fletch961 » Mon 27 Jun 2005, 10:46:31

Carver
One way would be to find the number of barrel a country cunsumes on a per capita basis annually(about 25.4 in US, about 11.2 in UK). Every dollar rise in only would cost an american about $25.40. Multiply that by the number of people in a family. (The increase in oil prices used by business gets passed on in the form of higher consumer prices, the government eventually passes its additional costs on in the form of higher taxes.)

Every $10 increase in oil takes about $1000 out of an American family's pocket annually.
User avatar
fletch961
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun 05 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Postby turmoil » Mon 27 Jun 2005, 18:17:34

lets say that for 1 average US car, it requires a refill 2 or 3 times a month and has an avg tank size of 21 gallons (just a semi-educated guess).

at $1.00/gal

$1 x 2 x 21 = $42
$1 x 3 x 21 = $63

at $3.00/gal

$3 x 2 x 21 = $126
$3 x 3 x 21 = $189

at $5.00/gal

$5 x 2 x 21 = $210
$5 x 3 x 21 = $315

at $10.00/gal

$10 x 2 x 21 = $420
$10 x 3 x 21 = $630

If you check different monthly incomes we begin to see the percentage of monthly income just going to gas for 1 car. At varying percentages, priorities shift.

anyway, thats how i look at it.
Last edited by turmoil on Tue 28 Jun 2005, 01:38:33, edited 1 time in total.
"If you are a real seeker after truth, it's necessary that at least once in your life you doubt all things as far as possible"-Rene Descartes

"When you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains however improbable must be the truth"-Sherlock Holmes
User avatar
turmoil
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1088
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Richmond, VA, Pale Blue Dot

Postby matt21811 » Mon 27 Jun 2005, 22:28:44

21 Gallons is a massive overestimate of average tank size.

It even sounds a little large for average SUV tank size.

Also, most people dont empty the tank completely before they fill it.

My car has an 11 Gallon tank and I fill it up 2 times a month. I drive it to work 28 miles return. 1 passanger. I pay about $3.30 a gallon.

Thats 9gal * $3.3 *2 = $60 a month

Even at $10 a gal, it is still very worthwhile for me to drive to work.

I see no reason why Americans cant buy economical cars.
User avatar
matt21811
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 174
Joined: Sat 21 May 2005, 03:00:00

Postby turmoil » Tue 28 Jun 2005, 10:04:32

thanks for your post matt.

google search for: suv "gas tank" size gallons

you find an interesting world of large gas tanks.
One dated but relevant Article
Forum discussion

i realize that people don't use up a whole tank before refilling, but if you figure the avg US car uses about 32-42 gallons (the better part of a barrel or more) a month, then you can estimate cost. (not that i think this is a perfect way to figure out how much gas people use and what they will spend on it).

But my goal was to show how it adds up (er, multiplies) for cars with ~21 gallon tanks at different prices, not to solve the world's problems (which would be fairly easy if the human species was slightly different) and get people to drive more efficient cars. i have no doubt that people will drive fuel efficient cars when squeezed hard enough. But it seems to me (getting back to the thread at hand) that $10/gal would definitely cause growing costs of food, utilities, etc to compete with high gas costs for everyone.
"If you are a real seeker after truth, it's necessary that at least once in your life you doubt all things as far as possible"-Rene Descartes

"When you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains however improbable must be the truth"-Sherlock Holmes
User avatar
turmoil
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1088
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Richmond, VA, Pale Blue Dot

Postby pup55 » Tue 28 Jun 2005, 11:38:59

I agree with Fletch. The pain point comes way below $10 in the US.

I would further add the following:

Savings Rate

Based on this, the suburban household with the $70000 income only saves $560 per year at the current time. Any additional expenses beyond that means they have to either cut back on something else, or further max out their credit cards. so, based on the above calculations, anywhere over $.30 per gallon is getting into painful, and at .66 per gallon, the increase is starting to show up in the $100 per month range, which is detectable in the budget of the average suburban family.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')eople arn't going to just quit their jobs because gas has reached $5 a gallon.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')his will mean car pooling wheather they like to do it or not. Even an SUV that gets 15 miles per gallon but is packed with seven people gets 105 miles per person per gallon.


No, people will get laid off of their jobs just because gas has reached $5 per gallon. Reducing the number of vehicles on the road to 1/7 of the current level, as suggested above means a 6/7 reduction in disposable stuff, like tire usage, repairs, oil changes, etc. but in the long run, a 6/7 reduction in vehicle purchases. This trickles up stream: Fewer cars, fewer car salesmen, fewer people at the DMV, fewer loan officers at the bank, fewer people at the insurance company, less road construction and maintenance, less concrete and asphalt, less steel and rubber and chemicals. Before you know it, it goes through the whole economy, banking, financial, communications, right up to the government themselves.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Postby UncoveringTruths » Tue 28 Jun 2005, 11:58:03

pup55 wrote
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'r')ight up to the government themselves.


pup55 do you have any data on the amount of Oil and Fuel the US military consumes? Has there been increased consumption since we have been spreading democracy?
User avatar
UncoveringTruths
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Thu 04 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Postby RiverRat » Tue 28 Jun 2005, 12:46:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', 'I') agree with Fletch. The pain point comes way below $10 in the US.

I would further add the following:

Savings Rate

Based on this, the suburban household with the $70000 income only saves $560 per year at the current time.... snip


The article defines the the savings rate of .8% in terms of disposable income. So ... in reality the figure of $560 is high.

$70,000 - 30% tax rate = $49,000 * .8% = $392 (or only $32 per month 8O )

My question is ... how does 401k or IRA contributions factor into the realm of 'savings'. For example ... I deduct 6% per pay for my 401k and the wife contribute about $2,000 a year to her IRA.

If I ran the numbers, I would say our household has a savings rate (as defined in the article) of about 4% but what about the 401k or IRA contributions??
If ...'If's' and 'But's' ... were Candy and Nuts ... we would all be happy and fat !
RiverRat
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed 16 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Postby strider3700 » Tue 28 Jun 2005, 13:00:51

There is no way industry could survive $10 fuel. I Could survive $10 gas, thats only double what I currently pay and I'm doing reasonably well, but trucking is already being crushed.

I work in the logging industry so I'll mention it. Right now housing is booming, they can't get enough wood and concrete and thats partially driving prices up. But the price of shipping that wood around is also greatly increasing. Right now we have logging trucks that are not running simply because they lose money due to fuel costs. They had margins of 1 or 2% just to get the contracts and now they are better off to sit at home out of work. I hear the semi trucks running the highways are in the same situation, competition forced them right to the line and now they're screwed.

the lumber market will correct but it will take a year or so for the majority of contracts to be finished. At that time they can be renegotiated and the costs should be considerably higher. If fuel keeps climbing the demand for wood may drop due to the price increases.
shame on us, doomed from the start
god have mercy on our dirty little hearts
strider3700
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2865
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Vancouver Island

Postby pup55 » Tue 28 Jun 2005, 13:06:57

Defense Energy Support Center

The Center purchases more light refined petroleum product than any other single organization or company in the world. With a $3.5 billion annual budget, DESC procures nearly 110 million barrels of petroleum products each year. That’s enough fuel for 1,000 cars to drive around the world 4,620 times—or 115.5 trillion miles. products. The Center manages jet fuels, aviation gasoline, automotive gasoline, heating oils, power generation, naval propulsion fuels, lubricants, natural gas and coal.

Global Security

They will only admit to about 110 million barrels per year. Of course, the actual amount is probably classified.

Other DOD documents indicate that in 2002, before the shooting started, they budgeted about $5 billion per year for fuel.

DOD fuel budget

which at $35 per barrel, the budgeted amount, makes it closer to 142 million barrels.

So at a rate of 1.8 mbo/d exports from Iraq, that makes the EROEI for the Iraq invasion about 5:1, which is not quite as good as oil sands.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Postby UncoveringTruths » Tue 28 Jun 2005, 13:23:44

pup55,

Thanks

Now if we apply 142 mb at the current price of $60 barrel that equals 8.5 billion. 8O An increase of 3.5 billion! Ouch
User avatar
UncoveringTruths
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Thu 04 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Postby pup55 » Tue 28 Jun 2005, 13:26:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f I ran the numbers, I would say our household has a savings rate (as defined in the article) of about 4% but what about the 401k or IRA contributions??


The article does not say whether IRA's are counted or not.

Secondly, there is no talk about the precise definition of "disposable income", namely, is a weekly trip to the nail salon or going to Starbucks considered a "necessary expenditure".

So, I guess I would have to ask the question: Would your family notice $100 less money at the end of the month? How about $200? At some point, most people will start to feel it, and either quit saving, or cut back on frivolity. At that point, there is a little slug of demand destruction, because the nail salon lady or the guy at Starbucks is bringing in less money. The other day on this site there was a link about the area around Dollywood, and how the booking rate for hotels this summer is way off (my recollection is about 40%), as an example.

For most people, in my opinion, this point of restraint will take place closer to $100 per month than it will to $1000: $1000 per month, $12,000 per year, 2000 gallons=$6 per gallon.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Postby pup55 » Tue 28 Jun 2005, 13:27:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ow if we apply 142 mb at the current price of $60 barrel that equals 8.5 billion. An increase of 3.5 billion! Ouch


No problem. We will use it now, and let our kids pay it back (deficit spending).
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Postby Rochester » Tue 28 Jun 2005, 17:09:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')o, people will get laid off of their jobs just because gas has reached $5 per gallon. Reducing the number of vehicles on the road to 1/7 of the current level, as suggested above means a 6/7 reduction in disposable stuff, like tire usage, repairs, oil changes, etc. but in the long run, a 6/7 reduction in vehicle purchases. This trickles up stream: Fewer cars, fewer car salesmen, fewer people at the DMV, fewer loan officers at the bank, fewer people at the insurance company, less road construction and maintenance, less concrete and asphalt, less steel and rubber and chemicals. Before you know it, it goes through the whole economy, banking, financial, communications, right up to the government themselves.


Granted it wont be painless, but that's only half of it. There will be plenty of people getting big fat raises because oil companies will be rich with profits, rail companies will be booming again, utilities will be expanding as electricity demand grows to compensate, all of those commuters will be able to buy books and newspapers to read on their commute, telecommunications companies might make a profit again as telecommuting increases, many jobs shifted overseas may even come home as local roduction becomes a bigger factor in costs, etc...

There will be winners and their growth to some extent will soften the transition. At the end of WWII most workers were at factories, now they are not. At the beginning of the century most workers were in agriculture, now they are not. The transitions were painful, but not all one sided.
User avatar
Rochester
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon 20 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Postby pup55 » Tue 28 Jun 2005, 18:00:17

Actually, Rochester, you are quite right. New industry definitely leads to new opportunities for those who can adapt.

The trick will be the transition, though. Especially for the slow-adapters.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Postby fletch961 » Tue 28 Jun 2005, 20:49:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')efense Energy Support Center

The Center purchases more light refined petroleum product than any other single organization or company in the world. With a $3.5 billion annual budget, DESC procures nearly 110 million barrels of petroleum products each year. That’s enough fuel for 1,000 cars to drive around the world 4,620 times—or 115.5 trillion miles. products. The Center manages jet fuels, aviation gasoline, automotive gasoline, heating oils, power generation, naval propulsion fuels, lubricants, natural gas and coal.


110 M barrel is 4.6 Billion gallon. For the Defense dept to get 115.5 trillion miles out of it they must have some super efficient cars. (115.5 t / 4.6 B= 25,108 mpg) No wonder the gov. isn't concerned about peak oil-top secret engines that the government can roll out any time. Either that or some clown put a decimal point in the wrong spot.
User avatar
fletch961
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun 05 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Previous

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron