by Sixstrings » Wed 25 Feb 2015, 16:12:45
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Quinny', 'M')ore than 10,000 posts means you treat this forum seriously,
I just like talking to you guys and I learn things.
Maybe all of you dislike me, fine. What have I walked away with from this thread, though? At least I know what Agenda 21 is now, I'd never heard of it before. And it's made me thing about local development and urban planning. Not that I'll do anything about that, I cant' be bothered to go down to the country commission meetings.
But I've walked away with more understanding, and you have too, so what's your gripe. Do you guys just want echo chamber threads where everyone agrees with you? That really seems to be what you want, most of all in the environmentalist threads.
There's a neighboring city to me that is a member of that agenda 21 lcei or whatever cities group. They're a bit more lefty than people in my city. So over there, I don't know if it's coincidental or not, but yes they have more lefty city type things like nicer parks and urban planning and walkable areas. But I'll tell you something, they've got their poor walled off into ghettos too.
And they've got anti-loitering and anti-sleeping ordinances, to keep the street people out of those nice parks. So what happened, all the street people just came into my town. The other city gets to be so green and smug, saving the planet I guess, but really the poverty was just pushed outside.
I'm not anti-green, I may actually go move over there eventually -- who doesn't love a gated community without having to look at poor people -- but what gets at me, a lot, is the overall hypocrisy of the green movement. They're often elitists, by another name. They won't allow walmarts in, but yet they don't want working class / poor folks either much less provide a place they could afford to shop in.
Let's take a look at France. What does "green," socialist France look like. A lot of it is quite nice -- but their poor are also walled off, into huge tenement complexes. I think the UK is about the same, no?
So what is this green cities thing about, really? How does it save the planet if it's just green for the rich, with the lower 90% supporting it but they don't get to live shiny green because they're so damn poor?
P.S. You all just don't get my style. It's the same style supreme courts do argument, with. A justice will often ask crazy questions and go down extreme paths of reasoning -- just to hear the counterpoint. It's just a way to explore issues.