by Loki » Mon 23 Feb 2015, 00:07:27
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('copious.abundance', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', 'D')espite 0 percent interest rates and low gasoline prices the US economy is virtually dead. Retail sector in particular for 2014 is in abysmal condition. From what I have been reading about US economy over time this was all predictable but to now be living through it well we shall see just how bad it gets. Here in the link to the shocking state of the US economy . What does everyone think about this?
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-02-1 ... onomy-deadWhen one gets their economic information from Zerohedge, I'm not surprised they would think the US economy is dead.

I hate to agree with Oily, but Zerohedge is not a credible source of information about the economy (or likely anything else).
Here's one example from the article of "misreading" (AKA lying about) statistics:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut there is even further, equally overwhelming proof that this gas-guzzling, consumer economy is dead, and it comes from the gasoline consumption numbers, themselves. “Official” U.S. gasoline consumption hasplummeted by nearly 75% from its absolute peak in July of 1998. More pertinently; the gasoline consumption numbers have plummeted by roughly 66% since the start of the U.S.’s (imaginary)“recovery”.
This supposed 75% drop appears to come from
this dataset, which is gasoline retailed directly by refiners. Refiners have been getting out of retail sales for years. This dataset is not a measure of gasoline consumed in the US.
This is a better dataset, 4-Week Avg U.S. Product Supplied of Petroleum Products. Compared to the supposed peak in July 1998, we're actually consuming 3.5% more.
Just one example of the author's misrepresentation of the data. Pops also outlines the problem with the velocity of money figures. His explanation is also my understanding of this dataset.
Not to say the US economy is fine and dandy. Median household income is stagnant, as are wages (not unrelated phenomena). Unemployment (U-3) is much better than it was compared to the depth of the Great Recession, but labor force participation and employment population ratio are still quite low. And contrary to Oily's pronouncements, retirement does not explain this.
Employment population ratio, ages 25-54:

On an upward trend, but hardly recovered.
To call the US economy "dead" is vastly overstating the case. Secular stagnation, on the other hand.....
A garden will make your rations go further.