by dolanbaker » Tue 17 Feb 2015, 17:47:59
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Timo', 'I')'ve been thinking, which only occasionally has dangerous consequences, about collapse, and TEOTWAWKI. Collapse had multiple variables and degrees. To most Americans and Western World inhabitants in general, a visit to a 3rd world country, where the same standards for quality of life and government controls that we have in the US don't exist, that would be a real eye-opener. If those same lower or more lax standards suddenly became the norm in our 1st world culture, most people up here would consider that to be the definition of collapse. Yet, life goes on in those countries quite nicely, and people do manage to enjoy life in spite of the unrealized extent of governement controls or commercial or government services. No phone service? No problem. Take a walk down to that person's house and talk to them. No arugala for your salad? Eat romaine, instead. Make do with what you've got. No internet? Do something productive with your time, instead. No car? Take the bus!
My point is that most of the world lives quite well in lesser standards than we're used to, so the very idea of "collapse" is very relative. How much? Is the loss of the internet collapse? Is the loss of gasoline to fuel your car collapse? Is it the cessation of mail delivery? The end of all government, local, state, and Fed? Martial law? I've lived under martial law, and that doesn't come close to fulfilling the definition of collapse. Hell, 30 years ago, the internet didn't even exist! 130 years ago, the automobile didn't exist? Global trade to fill the shelves of the supermarket didn't exist. Commercial air travel didn't exist. Is the loss of any of these luxuries collapse? Is the loss of any two or three luxuries in tandem collapse? Are we looking at a future Mad Max world, or just a simpler, less convaluted way of life? I started a thread asking people to define their own personal expectations of the future. This is a big part of that. Define collapse. How low will we go? How chaotic will things get? I'm not asking for personal enecdotes of prepping for that event. I'm asking for everyone to define that event.
OK. I'm done. Thanks for listening.
Good post, Yes life will carry on; just not as we're used to.
I expect things to decline quite slowly as many of the mitigating factors are already in place, for example fuel efficiency is vastly better than it was a couple of decades ago. Houses are vastly better insulated as well, the new generation of young adults are embracing an urban lifestyle that is less car-centric than their parents. These steps in the right direction will reduce the steepness of the energy consumption decline that is inevitable in the near future. So a transition to a lower energy intensive lifestyle is possible.
But what is worrying are the three E's, Economy, Employment & the Elderly.
The current economic system is hard coded to operate with infinite growth, we're already seeing it creaking under the near zero interest rates for banks and money printing to replace that which should have been created by growth. Unemployment will be a real problem when the growth stops and economic activity contracts as it must when there is less energy available and finally the world of babyboomers are retiring and many countries will soon be burdened by an excessively large population of old people who will be a severe drain on the health services.
These issues could overshadow peak oil completely.
Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.:Anonymous
Our whole economy is based on planned obsolescence.
Hungrymoggy "I am now predicting that Europe will NUKE ITSELF sometime in the first week of January"