by Outcast_Searcher » Sun 08 Mar 2015, 13:26:50
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('davep', 'W')henever the "business cycle" inherent in the debt-based money system goes through a phase of reduced money supply there is always a consolidation of wealth amongst the elite.
The current strong trend toward wealth concentration started in the early 80's. The PC and the move toward the computer being ubiquitous started (in earnest) with IBM's PC in the early 80's.
I don't think this is purely coincidence. And what does it take to productively use computers to gain wealth from information (via a good job, investments, running a business better, seeing trends to capitalize on better, etc)? EDUCATION.
And WHO doesn't do more than mouth platitudes about meaningful improvements to the faltering US education K-12 system? Or a meaningful program to help newly unemployed (or all unemployed) people who will do acceptable academic work obtain better job skills? The politicians we elect -- and of course the electorate itself, by proxy.
I'd STRONGLY like to see a meaningful attempt to address this in the US. As a capitalist and a taxpayer who tends to lean right on financial issues but left on many social issues -- I think there is a very good chance that it would:
1). Pay for itself several times in terms of better future tax revenues and less dependency on government programs -- via a gainfully employed better skilled citizenry.
2). Help the US objectively in terms of better overall living conditions, and more importantly, show that the system is more fair by providing better opportunities for people to earn their way to success, even as technology and job requirements change.
Now, what are the chances I think this sort of thing could happen? Sadly, VERY low -- as I don't see meaningful changes in the US mentality as likely in the short to moderate term. (Throwing food stamps and endless social programs that don't solve the problem - "good" -- education and expecting a certain level of self reliance - "bad"). Facepalm
What are the chances I think the endless complaining about how "unfair" it is that educated people, availing themselves of technology, continue to create a lot more wealth relative to uneducated people (and personally become wealthier as a result) will simmer down? Very low. It's far easier to imagine a boogey man and gain votes by attacking them than to actually attempt to fix the root problem.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.