Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Einstein was right after all....

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Einstein was right after all....

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Fri 16 Jan 2015, 05:04:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', 'G')ravity Probe B proved this out a few years ago. Everyone already knew Einstein was correct on this subject.


I know that much, Einstein has been proven right already, many times.

Wasn't there some kind of experiment with atomic clocks? Just flying them on airplanes? And then one clock was slightly behind the other? Thus proving that the faster you go, the more time slows down, most pronounced close to the speed of light.

As for the binary pulsars..

Some good explanations in this thread but I'm still not getting it. I think I need a Neil de Grasse Tyson to explain it to me.


I was part of that experiment, in fact. The USCG used HP5061 Cesium Beam frequency standards (aka "atomic clocks") to run a precision navigation system (pre-GPS) called LORAN-C. When we did the annual calibration, we referenced several of these frequency standards to the master Hydrogen MASER standard at the Naval Observatory, and then flew them from station to station. Lastly they were returned to the Naval Observatory and re-checked. Those standards which had flown around the Earth in an Eastern direction all displayed a phase error (a miniscule time shift) that varied in magnitude from those which had flown around the world in a Western direction.

Travel in one direction was being added to the radial velocity of the Earth, while travel in the other direction was being subtracted from the radial velocity. A professor at the Naval Observatory realized that this was an unplanned confirmation of General Relativity. The experiment was repeated in 1971 with USAF assistance. Two planes were flown around the world as rapidly as possible in opposite directions, using in-flight refueling, and the exact phase difference between planes did indeed confirm the time dilation effect predicted by Einstein.

We were furnished with precision phase correction adjustments for each of our frequency standards, calculated based on the route flown by the calibration standards. The LORAN-C system achieved the maximum theoretical accuracy possible as a result, early in 1973, about +/- 10 feet or 3 meters. Then in a remarkably short time the new GPS system eclipsed this in 1975 when differential GPS receivers achieved repeatable sub one foot accuracy. Technology marches on.

The LORAN-C system was finally shut down in 2010, and is part of history now. When I wore a USCG uniform it was the absolute hardest electronic specialty (aka "Rate") to have. I was heavily recruited for OCS, offered a free education and commision, but I was so sick of military BS I had to get out. After I got my Electrical Engineering degree on my own dime (plus the GI Bill), my work products (computers that count money securely) changed the world and enabled Internet commerce.

Now I'm gonna get off the technology train and enjoy my grandkids, twins due in early June.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: Einstein was right after all....

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 16 Jan 2015, 07:02:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', 'y')ou can't get a big enough effect to measure with airplanes and atomic clocks.


If one person stands stationary and another runs off, time is slower for the person at greater velocity, relative to the observer -- the one running is closer to the speed of light than the person that is standing still, the observer's velocity is just the velocity of the earth in orbit.

The time variance is greater, the closer you get to c.

Clocks back on the ground were ahead of the ones that were in flight:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/8/8a/Hafele%E2%80%93Keating_experiment.jpg/220px-Hafele%E2%80%93Keating_experiment.jpg[/img]
Hafele and Keating aboard a commercial airliner, with two of the atomic clocks and a stewardess.

Image
One of the actual HP 5061A Cesium Beam atomic clock units used in the Hafele–Keating experiment

The Hafele–Keating experiment was a test of the theory of relativity. In October 1971, Joseph C. Hafele, a physicist, and Richard E. Keating, an astronomer, took four cesium-beam atomic clocks aboard commercial airliners. They flew twice around the world, first eastward, then westward, and compared the clocks against others that remained at the United States Naval Observatory. When reunited, the three sets of clocks were found to disagree with one another, and their differences were consistent with the predictions of special and general relativity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hafele%E2%80%93Keating_experiment


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'I') was part of that experiment, in fact. The USCG used HP5061 Cesium Beam frequency standards (aka "atomic clocks") to run a precision navigation system (pre-GPS) called LORAN-C.


Fascinating Kaiser, well a personal story being part of the experiment that proved relativity sure beats my wikipedia link. 8O

That must have been quite a moment back then, proving relativity. Wasn't this the first proof ever? What did you make of it, back then, and the others in the project?

To a lay person, it's like magic, all this quantum mechanics and theory of relativity stuff. Clocks that slow down the faster you go. And those little quarks or whatever they are, how they can be in two places at once, depending on the observer. Black holes, multiverses. Just so many fascinating things.. like how if the big bang were just a *little* bit slower it would have all contracted back in and failed to expand. But if just a little bit faster, then it would have been too fast for anything to collect together and form nebulae and everything else.

Thank you for your post, that's very interesting. You explained why there were two flights, one west one east. The one going west is better than an observer just on the ground so I gather the clock that was flying west would have been ahead of the clock on the ground, and the clock that flew east would have been behind the one left on the ground. Since the earth rotates to the east. Which, as I'm sure you know, is why rockets angle up on a eastward slope, to take advantage of orbital velocity. And why polar orbits require more thrust and fuel.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Einstein was right after all....

Unread postby Quinny » Fri 16 Jan 2015, 10:20:09

Bending light, speeding up time, and there's little old me thinking people had simply seen the light!

Albert Einstein - Monthly Review 1949

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy, accompanied by an educational system which would be oriented toward social goals. In such an economy, the means of production are owned by society itself and are utilized in a planned fashion. A planned economy, which adjusts production to the needs of the community, would distribute the work to be done among all those able to work and would guarantee a livelihood to every man, woman, and child. The education of the individual, in addition to promoting his own innate abilities, would attempt to develop in him a sense of responsibility for his fellow men in place of the glorification of power and success in our present society.


http://monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/
Live, Love, Learn, Leave Legacy.....oh and have a Laugh while you're doing it!
User avatar
Quinny
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Einstein was right after all....

Unread postby dinopello » Fri 16 Jan 2015, 11:06:57

This here is Einstein's clock

Image

A friend of mine was just in Bern for a conference and I was insisting that she take a video in front of the Zytglogge as she was running away from it as fast as she could. She's in the banking industry and so didn't get it at all.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village

Re: Einstein was right after all....

Unread postby Timo » Fri 16 Jan 2015, 11:18:41

Fascinating story, KJ. I get your ultimate antipathy toward continuing on in the military, but on the flip side, they lost. Reading true histories like this makes me regret not being more scientifically inclined, and that extends before my TBI.

Actually, come to think of it, physics actually makes a bit more sense to me now than it did in high school. :roll:

Another true story, i dropped my physics class as a sophomore because i lost my text book, and was too terrified of the teacher to ask for another one. He was a mean SOB.

Anyway, enjoy life with the grandkids. It would appear you've earned a bit of enjoyment and relaxation.
Timo
 

Re: Einstein was right after all....

Unread postby AgentR11 » Fri 16 Jan 2015, 13:58:35

Six, you're missing the point.

The time effect *IS* measurable with planes and clocks.

The distortion of the shape of space by gravity is *NOT* measurable with planes and clocks.

Relativity isn't just about time.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: Einstein was right after all....

Unread postby Tanada » Fri 16 Jan 2015, 15:20:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', 'S')ix, you're missing the point.

The time effect *IS* measurable with planes and clocks.

The distortion of the shape of space by gravity is *NOT* measurable with planes and clocks.

Relativity isn't just about time.


However the distortion of space by gravity lensing effects IS measurable and has been confirmed many times.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Einstein was right after all....

Unread postby AgentR11 » Fri 16 Jan 2015, 16:09:21

But not with a airplanes and clocks.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: Einstein was right after all....

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Fri 16 Jan 2015, 16:27:59

My perspective on that experiment was more or less that of an ant. They told us what they were trying to achieve, of course - and we had to keep detailed records of phase adjustments that were inserted into the system (which we called LPAs which stood for "Local Phase Adjustments"). But my actual role as an enlisted man and ET2 (Electronics Technician 2nd Class) was one of equipment operator and equipment maintenance technician.

The fundamental idea with LORAN (LOng Range Aid to Navigation) was that you used two clocks that were tweaked to be exactly in sync. The signal from the frequency standard was "divided" until the original RF frequency (based on light emitted when Cesium atoms did a quantum phase change) was 100kHz, an RF frequency in the VLF (Very Low Frequency) band that propagated in straight lines directly from the transmitter to the receiver, through the crust of the Earth. The 100kHz RF was amplified in a series of vacuum tubes until it reached 2 megawatts peak radiated power using 8 massive vacuum tubes each which was supplied with 18,500 volts DC at about 1.3 amps. The transmitter was gated on/off so that the RF was in "pulses" which saved power and lengthened the life of the expensive $500 transmitting tubes. High power vacuum tubes do not have long lives, and need constant tweaking and tuning, thus there was a staff of ETs operating and repairing the equipment at each LORAN station.

The users ran 100kHz receivers and measured the time difference between the reception of two pulses from different transmitters. Since the RF propagated at the speed of light, each time difference value corresponded to a curve called a hyperbola. (The definition of a hyperbola in mathematics is a locus of points that are a constant difference distance from two "focal points".) We located a 100kHz RF transmitter at each of these focal points (A and B), and the receiver allowed you to overlap the two 100kHz RF pulses in an oscilloscope and read the time difference in microseconds off of the "vernier dial" that moved the traces on the 'scope.

If the time difference was say 653 microseconds, you were somewhere on the A/B 653 microsecond hyperbola on a printed LORAN chart. If you then took a second time difference between another pair of stations (A and C), and got say 701 microseconds difference, then you knew you were also on the A/C 701 microsecond hyperbola on the chart. The spot where the A/B 653 microsecond hyperbola overlaps the A/C 701 microsecond hyperbola was your actual physical position, and a simple straightedge allowed you to read the latitude and longitude from the scales printed on the edges of the "LORAN chart".

GPS is far more accurate because it is based upon "Doppler shifts" of much much higher microwave RF, easier to measure with greater accuracy. Each GPS receiver actually monitors multiple satellites - often a dozen or more - and the time when the Doppler shift goes from negative to positive on one satellite is when any particular satellite is closest to the receiver - at the maximum height above the visible horizon.

The Astro-physicist Christian Doppler's work was measuring shifts in the spectra of stars which are receding from or nearing an Earth observer - but the "Doppler phase shifts" in microwave GPS signals are another example of General Relativity - and each time you use a GPS receiver you are in a sense confirming GR yet again.

Doppler published his spectral data in 1842. Einstein published his theory of General Relativity around 1915. LORAN-A was invented by the British in WW2 (they used MF transmissions below 2 Mhz to guide bombers into Germany) and the LORAN-C system I worked on came online around 1957 and was the primary electronic navigation system for planes and ships - and submerged submarines under the ice - through about 1985 when GPS replaced it. But there were users invested in LORAN equipment (small fishing boats) who insisted that the LORAN system remain functional until the price of new solid state GPS receivers got cheaper than the surplus vacuum tube receivers the military used and then sold. One of those fishermen told me he really missed his LORAN receiver on cold nights even though the GPS was much simpler - because the older vacuum tubes generated enough heat to keep his pilothouse warm on his fishing boat!
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: Einstein was right after all....

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 16 Jan 2015, 17:37:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', 'T')he distortion of the shape of space by gravity is *NOT* measurable with planes and clocks.


A saw a "neil de grasse tyscon" type documentary once, wasn't cosmos I can't remember which one, but it had a fancy graphic that explained it well to me.

That space is like a trampoline.

So put a bowling ball in the middle of, and it will sink down, and is no longer flat but convex. Now roll a tennis ball down that convex, and it will be drawn toward the bowling ball and then spin around it at the edge. I realize this isn't a perfect analogy. But the point is that just like the bowling ball on the trampoline, any mass in space is distorting space around it, and that is gravity.

We are stuck to the earth. Satellites in orbit are in equalibrium, balanced between falling and their velocity. Earth orbits the sun. Our solar system orbits the massive black hole at the center of our galaxy. And the galaxies are in constant motion as well, there's one of them that's scheduled to collide and pass through ours at some point in the future.

And then, most of the universe, like 95% or something, is all "dark matter" -- what the heck is that stuff, and how does it fit in with space time.

And, apparently, there are "multiverses" and it's like plastic films hanging and there's one on top of the other and a multitude of them. And they ripple, and are separate, but sometimes they collide.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Einstein was right after all....

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 16 Jan 2015, 17:46:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', 'B')ut not with a airplanes and clocks.


I'm not following you, are you saying that gravity -- distortion of space -- is not proveable?
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Einstein was right after all....

Unread postby AgentR11 » Fri 16 Jan 2015, 17:52:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', 'B')ut not with a airplanes and clocks.

I'm not following you, are you saying that gravity -- distortion of space -- is not proveable?


It is provable, and has been proven, but its proof has nothing to do with airplanes and clocks.

Airplanes and clocks is the time dilation effect of velocity, not the space distortion effect of gravity.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Einstein was right after all....

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 16 Jan 2015, 19:00:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', 'A')irplanes and clocks is the time dilation effect of velocity, not the space distortion effect of gravity.


Ok, I get you. But I thought space-time were the same thing? Or something?
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Einstein was right after all....

Unread postby Tanada » Fri 16 Jan 2015, 19:03:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', 'B')ut not with a airplanes and clocks.


Correct, it was done with old fashioned optical telescopes and math.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Einstein was right after all....

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Fri 16 Jan 2015, 22:06:36

Before we get too far down alternate interpretations, let me say:

1) The time dilation effect of velocity was proved by the Hafele–Keating experiment, after the effects of time dilation were noted in the apparent "errors" in calibration of the LORAN-C system. The LORAN-C system was the first time literally dozens of precise atomic clocks were transported and then compared. The experiment was performed more than once, but Hafele and Keating had to perform it one final time on a civilian airliner in order to publish results, because the LORAN-C system was also a semi-classified military system, the data captured using USCG and USAF assets was classified during the Cold War. The pictures in Wikipedia are of the final public experiment - and I don't know why they are blurry and B&W, I have many pictures taken with cheap cameras from that era which are finally focussed and in color.

2) Doppler shifts are examples of frequency shifts of objects in relative motion. It is after all only a matter of your "frame of reference" as to whether the source or observer is moving, and the paired observer or source stationary. Actually the universe, this galaxy, the solar system, and the Earth are all in motion - you must pick a "frame of reference" and describe such motion relative to yourself.

3) The pulsar observations are what prove that gravity bends electromagnetic waves. This could be hinted at but not explained by optical astronomy, there was a raging debate about how to interpret the subtle observed optical data - and pulsars were not known until the advent of radio astronomy in the 2nd half of the 20th century. All modern advances in Astronomy and almost all Astronomers are working on Radio Astronomy today - which is several centuries younger than optical astronomy, practiced by many observers from Galileo through Copernicus and used in "Celestial Navigation", which involves using a sextant and observations of celestial bodies plus an accurate clock to determine a position on Earth. The role of the Naval Observatory used to be to generate the tables of figures used in celestial navigation - but today that is a dying art, replaced by GPS. So the Naval Observatory and the "Atomic Clocks" including the master Hydrogen MASER are used for Scientific research.

4) Time dilation, Doppler shifts, and the interactions of gravity and electromagnetic waves are all described by the equations generated by Einstein and published in 1915. That is what the theory of General Relativity is about, and a true understanding of it is gained by doing the math, not by talking. I glimpsed this world when I took courses in Quantum Electronics, but I was out of my depth by then, and made a deliberate choice to focus upon circuit design (Boolean Algebra and Network Analysis) rather than the really heavy math needed to understand Quantum Physics or Astro-Physics. Thus my mathematics ended at advanced Algebra and Calculus and Differential Equations. It gets pretty intense beyond that point, and frankly the financial rewards and employment opportunities get sparser.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: Einstein was right after all....

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 16 Jan 2015, 22:47:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'T')hat is what the theory of General Relativity is about, and a true understanding of it is gained by doing the math, not by talking.


True, but this stuff is so groovy, you're always going to draw in the metaphysical ayahuasca universal big mind types too, that otherwise can't get beyond business math.

It's philosophically fascinating. It's glimpsing into the machinery of the heavens.

What is TIME? It's an intangible. There was the big bang.. what is the latest theory on that now, that it will keep expanding to heat death or that it contracts again at some point to big bang all over again, a neverending cycle?

So what is time.

This is just so far out. If I'm driving in a car and you're standing still, then you are getting older faster than I am -- infinitesimally at these small velocity variances, but still. How wild is that?

What is "time," anyway. What is the mechanism of this. How is it that an atomic clock that's going fast somehow has a slower rate of radioactive decay versus one left stationary on the ground. What's the mechanism of that, I really do not understand it and there ought to be some lay way of explaining / illustrating it.

I guess the only answer is that time is just relative? Like those quarks that are relative depending on the observer, too? What about those experiments, it's something like if nobody is looking at the experiment then the quarks don't do anything. Then if you look at it one way, they go one direction, look at another way, they go through the other slot. Look at it another way and they're going through both slots. And I admit I don't understand any of this, I think I had a little bit of a grasp on it at one time and then I forgot it. But it's why quantum computers are so good at encryption breaking, for example, because those quarks or whatever can be all places at once and so the computer can see all possible solutions, simultaneously.

So anyhow, what the hell is "time?"

(speaking of psychadelics -- take some of those and you realize your sense of time is all in your head, anyway. Sense of time is controlled by areas in the brain, tinker with those and a minute can feel like an hour, etc.

I guess it's just all relative, with no universal constant? But there has to be a constant, because those astronauts on the super fast close to light speed starship will in fact live a lot longer than those traveling slower at earth velocity back home. The ones back home will grow old, and pass away, while the astronauts barely age in the meantime.

Stars go through their phases, to red giant, to nova and it all starts over again. The universe expands at a certain rate. So there are, in fact, constants -- so how is time relative.)
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Einstein was right after all....

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Sat 17 Jan 2015, 00:26:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', '3')) The pulsar observations are what prove that gravity bends electromagnetic waves. This could be hinted at but not explained by optical astronomy, there was a raging debate about how to interpret the subtle observed optical data - and pulsars were not known until the advent of radio astronomy in the 2nd half of the 20th century.
I don't remember pulsar observations being the proof.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_ ... by_the_Sun
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: Einstein was right after all....

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Sat 17 Jan 2015, 04:57:55

OK, the pulsar observations at radio frequencies were simply the first time that anybody measured the amount of bending of electromagnetic waves that agreed with the amount of bending in Einstein's GR prediction. The only reason we could even tell is because the wavelength of the RF used is longer and the measurements therefore more accurate than those made at much higher optical frequencies with much shorter and harder to measure wavelengths.

Granted there were already people who thought the optical data had already proved GR. Granted there remain people who still believe that even the RF measurements don't prove GR is entirely correct.

Now that we have thoroughly abused the word "proof", perhaps we could tackle something really hard such as what the meaning of "is" is. William Jefferson Clinton has of course already done that, but there still are people here on this globe who actually believe that WJC DID IN FACT have what most astronomical observers would accept as an actual sex act with Monica Lewinski. :roll:

But of course, given the timing, there remains some doubt about such an observation. There is the distinct possibility that this astronomical observation was actually made with ulterior motives, such as the sabotage of Hillary's primary campaign for 2016.

Perhaps it is in fact a CONSPIRACY to discredit Hillary as a means of diverting attention from the shadowy and hard to fathom activities of the sinister society of Freemasons....and we are being manipulated by the same group who actually assassinated JFK and faked the moon landing....
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron