Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Get your crystal balls out

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Get your crystal balls out

Postby spot5050 » Fri 24 Jun 2005, 14:12:33

Look at the chart below and at the same time think about this question;

"Bearing in mind that expensive oil has a nasty habit of causing a recession, how high can the price of oil go?"


Link to chart: oil prices adjusted for inflation



I think that;

1. I need to get out more.
2. Before I go out, I would like to understand the above.

(Yes the chart is a little out of date, and yes this question has been debated a few months back, but the world moves on, people change, opinions change, and anyway no consensus was reached last time so I think it's worth revisiting.)
spot5050
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 518
Joined: Tue 07 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Cheshire, England

Postby turmoil » Fri 24 Jun 2005, 14:28:45

if this is a two part question, i do not understand the second part. 8O
"If you are a real seeker after truth, it's necessary that at least once in your life you doubt all things as far as possible"-Rene Descartes

"When you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains however improbable must be the truth"-Sherlock Holmes
User avatar
turmoil
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1088
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Richmond, VA, Pale Blue Dot

Postby Carlhole » Fri 24 Jun 2005, 14:32:26

I think crude is going to spike upwards to about $100 in the near future give or take $10, then it will settle back to around $65 and begin a slow steady rise. As this happens, recognition that we will HAVE to do something about our oil consumption will take hold seriously in the mainstream news.

...wait a sec, my crystal ball is fogging up, oh shit, it's showing me pictures of genetically modified human beings with big large eyes and no genitals.
Carlhole
 

Postby Trindelm » Fri 24 Jun 2005, 15:38:24

yes.. and they are walking into large.. silvery saucer shaped vehicles theat fly.. flying.. saucers yes! they. are. in. "flying saucers".
I see them travelling through time, gang-probing country-folk and stealing cattle.

And one is talking to me.. his name is freh.. no fred yes and he is hungry there is a famine on his world or the world to be and he must replenish his hunger with mountains of Straw Berry Ice Cream They are stealing dairy cows and ransacking strawberries from our present earth!
Such visions and horrors!! Enough!!!

This is not a gift but a curse...why lord whyyyy!!!
Trindelm
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Postby RiverRat » Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:13:00

By looking at the graph, it appears that the US was able to withstand almost 4 years of $60 and above oil prices (inflation adjusted from late ’79 – ’83). Also, we were able to withstand almost 3 years at $70 and above. By ‘withstand’, I mean society not completely collapsing.

It took about a year to spike from $50 to $94.48.

I would postulate that we could withstand higher prices but for shorter durations. I would say that oil at $95-$100 in current dollars would put the brakes on rampant demand. The wild card in the equation is just how leveraged the typical consumer is. We have far more personal and government debt than we did in the mid 70’s to the early 80’s.

On a back off the envelope calculation, $100 oil would equate to about $4 per gallon gas. I think we could only sustain that for a sort period of time (maybe a little over 6 months).
If ...'If's' and 'But's' ... were Candy and Nuts ... we would all be happy and fat !
RiverRat
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed 16 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Postby Tanada » Fri 24 Jun 2005, 17:14:17

I think there is a boiling frog effect at work here as well. What I mean is, to boil a live frog you start out with a pan of cold water, the frog doesn't notice the gradual change soon enough to jump out before it cooks.

If the price keeps rising $10.00 US per year, or even $15.00, I think people will adjust, the economy will slow but not stop and alternatives will move in as the price crosses profit thresholds for each substitute.

Moving from $27.00 to $ 60.00 over 24 months has not slowed the world economy much at all, if we had jumped from $30 straight to $60 I think we would be in a deep recession right now, because consumer spending is based in large part on confidence in the future. A gradual rise is not thrilling, but it isn't terrifying either, and people make mental adjustments.

The real problem is, will the price continue to grow in a survivable manner, or will it be a case of TSHTF and panic buying drives the price sky high in a month, stalling the world economy and crashing us into depression?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Postby jaws » Fri 24 Jun 2005, 17:58:37

Remember we are not yet at the peak. Total global oil output has yet to fall, all we have seen is a deceleration in supply growth and rapid acceleration in demand growth. The big spikes in prices and economic hardship come when the decline begins. It will be like the 1979 event every year.
User avatar
jaws
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sun 24 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Postby Tanada » Fri 24 Jun 2005, 18:19:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jaws', 'R')emember we are not yet at the peak. Total global oil output has yet to fall, all we have seen is a deceleration in supply growth and rapid acceleration in demand growth. The big spikes in prices and economic hardship come when the decline begins. It will be like the 1979 event every year.


I will beleive it when it happens, and not until. That doesn;t mean I won;t take reasonable precautions, but I am not going to jump on the doomer bandwagon either.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Postby Carlhole » Sat 25 Jun 2005, 12:36:31

I've noticed that recent news reports that have compared today's prices to the record highs of the early eighties have steadily ratcheted those inflation-adjusted records higher. Some have used a figure as low as $65, most have said crude traded for about $80 in 2005 dollars. Now stories are quoting the mid-nineties. The variance is the result of people using different inflation-factors.

I wonder what figure a very rigorous analysis would arrive at for the all-time record price of crude adjusted to 2005 dollars?
Carlhole
 

Postby agni » Sat 25 Jun 2005, 17:44:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'I')'ve noticed that recent news reports that have compared today's prices to the record highs of the early eighties have steadily ratcheted those inflation-adjusted records higher. Some have used a figure as low as $65, most have said crude traded for about $80 in 2005 dollars. Now stories are quoting the mid-nineties. The variance is the result of people using different inflation-factors.

I wonder what figure a very rigorous analysis would arrive at for the all-time record price of crude adjusted to 2005 dollars?


Very true. I was reading yesterday how the government has modified the equation for calculting inflation since the 90s to show less inflation than there is. It is done by weighting prices of different sectors of the economy differently and other such games. That's why you find finance people saying there is only 2% inflation but you find your dollars purchasing less every time you go to the market. If the above is true, than the actual rate of inflation is higher than what it is typically represented as. Which means the inflation adjusted price in the 80s would be higher as well. Which probably means while you might see a recession with higher oil prices, we may not be close to a 30s style depression.

-A
User avatar
agni
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Extented Chart

Postby Novus » Sat 25 Jun 2005, 20:04:46

Here is what my crystal ball tells me. I increased the Red line to represent the $60 that is already here and then made prediction through 2006.


Link to chart: oil prices adjusted for inflation
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Postby Macsporan » Sun 26 Jun 2005, 08:26:24

AAAAEEEEEI! 8O
User avatar
Macsporan
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu 09 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Australia

Postby pea-jay » Sun 26 Jun 2005, 16:08:59

Besting the 1979 price is a large milestone. Until then, every two-bit economist will keep refering to the fact oil is still cheaper than 1979 in inflation adjusted terms, so shut up and stop bitching.

Going above that really does put us into uncharted territory. I also agre that how we cross it also makes a difference. Bolting across 1979 in a fit a panic has whole different implications than inching across it on a quiet tuesday afternoon's worth of trading on NYMEX.
UNplanning the future...
http://unplanning.blogspot.com
User avatar
pea-jay
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1547
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: NorCal

Postby spot5050 » Mon 27 Jun 2005, 20:08:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RiverRat', 'B')y looking at the graph, it appears that the US was able to withstand almost 4 years of $60 and above oil prices (inflation adjusted from late ’79 – ’83). Also, we were able to withstand almost 3 years at $70 and above.

Yes (assuming inflation adjusting works in practice).

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RiverRat', 'I')t took about a year to spike from $50 to $94.48.

But dont you think that the situation now is slightly different because that spike was political whereas this spike will be due to peak oil?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RiverRat', 'I') would say that oil at $95-$100 in current dollars would put the brakes on rampant demand.

Going on gut instinct, I think the same; somewhere between $60 and $100 there's a balance point.

It feels like the markets are becoming more and more aware of the price of oil - like they're testing various levels and seeing how each one feels. Where we are now feels slightly odd, but the world hasn't ended so we'll carry on up to the next range and see how that feels...
spot5050
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 518
Joined: Tue 07 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Cheshire, England
Top

Postby spot5050 » Mon 27 Jun 2005, 20:35:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', 'I') think there is a boiling frog effect at work here

Yes.

It's the price that matters not the rate of change of the price. The price shot up rapidly in 1973, then didn't fall back, instead it shot up again just as rapidly in 1980, but then it did fall back.

The system copes with fast changes in the price but cant endure long term price changes. Long term price changes get fed back into the system eventually.
spot5050
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 518
Joined: Tue 07 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Cheshire, England
Top

Postby jato » Mon 27 Jun 2005, 20:44:16

I had to link those charts to fix the page formatting.

I can't stand having to scroll side-to-side for any length of time. :)
jato
 

Postby Petro » Mon 27 Jun 2005, 20:54:51

Jato!
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') can't stand having to scroll side-to-side for any length of time

says alot about you. How terribly tragic for you to have to move your fucking mouse. I hope that/this was a joke.
User avatar
Petro
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 349
Joined: Thu 14 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Postby jato » Mon 27 Jun 2005, 21:03:37

I already move it a million times per day! If I can save a few dozen mouse moves multiplied by hundreds of viewers of this thread then I feel better.

See, just by responding I have moved the mouse even more and had to type all of this text!

:-D
:-D

(more typing a mouse clicks)

8)
jato
 

Postby spot5050 » Mon 27 Jun 2005, 22:32:47

I hate it when people start those threads where you have to scroll side-to-side....

... damn it was me <g>.
spot5050
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 518
Joined: Tue 07 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Cheshire, England


Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron