Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Years

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sat 22 Nov 2014, 01:39:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', 'Y')eah, he makes cool cars for very rich people.


You have a point, there -- I can't afford a $70 - $100k tesla so you're right, I don't care about it either. I find the business story of it interesting though, and how he does things.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')e also says really stupid stuff at times. Why should he be immune to being called out for saying really stupid things -- because he makes electric cars? Give me a break.


He's a bit *naive* or something. That's the cool factor of the guy. He is not politically correct. He's so blunt, no filters. It's like he's got fresh eyes on things, or something, I keep thinking of Hank Reardon in Atlas Shrugged.

Anyhow, all I care about is spacex. Scientific knowledge is democratic, it benefits ALL of us. And it's exploration, it's the frontier, it's something we need but people just got stuck into a rut of not wanting this funded anymore from government. No big things anymore, no next Apollo mission.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')t least Ray Kurzweil, who is an actual artificial intelligence expert, when making wildly inaccurate (overoptimistic) assumptions about the future of A/I in the early 80's, gave his predictions about 30 years to unfold.


Yes, Kurzweil is an expert on the singularity thing.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hat I want to know is: why is Elon Musk given a free pass to say any stupid thing just because he's successful in one area?


No. But I'm just curious WHY many have this gut level hate thing about him, and then others are in the fanboy camp.

He's done good things for this country. He's a good role model. He's not just another hedge fund parasite in the hamptons, just TAKING, he is a 21st century industrialist making real things, here in the USA. We need more of that.

At least nobody can say I'm all negative, or I "hate the rich" -- when they do good, I get excited about that too, and applaud it. Billionaires aren't necessarily bad, or just taking from us -- if they're doing something good for society, if they're employing Americans, if they're proud of this country, then that's all good.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sat 22 Nov 2014, 02:16:25

The killer robots issue, about Musk anyhow, is dead, let it go. He's gonna write a blog on it and whenever that happens if you all want to dissect that then go for it.

I'm more interested in the big things he's doing.

If he starts just spamming his twitter and giving public statements about robot doom then yeah, ok, I'll join everyone else in saying something's wrong with him.

If nothing else he must focus on the darn rockets, and cars and gigabattery factories and solar panel factories and all of that, and watch his reputation.

Spacex is refitting the old space shuttle and Apollo launch pad, and that's where Falcon Heavy will make its first launch:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')ad 39A – SpaceX laying the groundwork for Falcon Heavy debut

SpaceX has confirmed it is now into the construction phase of converting Kennedy Space Center’s Pad 39A for its Falcon Heavy debut, with a large amount of work now taking place to build a new vehicle facility at the complex. The former Apollo and Space Shuttle pad is being re-purposed to host the maiden flight of SpaceX’s new rocket, set to launch as early as next summer.

...

The Falcon Heavy (FH) is a variant of the Falcon 9 v1.1 rocket, utilizing a core stage with two additional F9 v1.1 first stages on either side. A total of 27 Merlin 1Ds engines will loft the rocket off the pad.

SpaceX claims that the FH sports the ability to lift over 53 metric tons (117,000 lb) to Low Earth Orbit (LEO): more than twice the payload capacity (and one-third the cost) of the next closest operational vehicle, the Delta IV Heavy.

While the FH will have a West Coast home at Vandenberg Air Force Base’s SLC-4E, its debut launch is on track to occur out of KSC.

Preparations for the launch are now in full swing, with construction work visible at 39A – as seen in photos acquired by L2.

Image
Image
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2014/11/pad-39a-spacex-groundwork-falcon-heavy-debut/


Okay, notice that article -- the Falcon Heavy will lift more than the Delta IV Heavy, for *one third of the cost.*

That's the big deal about spacex's strategy, they want the resuable rockets to get to even a fraction of these already cheap rockets.

But even 1/3 the old cost is a big help. That's the difference of new projects in space, or not, it's about the cost.

It's not that spacex is so exciting, it's what the low launch cost will enable -- all the things that come after. This low launch cost is INFRASTRUCTURE, everything is built on that and comes after.

EDIT:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')img]http://www.geek.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/falcon-590x330.png[/img]

NASA films fascinating SpaceX Falcon 9 reentry, paving way for Mars missions

NASA says the test data it’s acquiring by observing SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket in action is invaluable. It could accelerate the design and testing of NASA’s future in-house rockets for long-haul deep space missions and save taxpayers millions of dollars over time. SpaceX is probably happy to have the data as well — it could assist Elon Musk and company in the ongoing design and implementation of its fully reusable Falcon 9, which has had several successful test landings.
http://www.geek.com/science/nasa-films-fascinating-spacex-falcon-9-reentry-with-infrared-cameras-1607260/


Okay, I'll lay off the spacex stuff now. :lol: If you want a discussion about sentient ai, then someone should post something concrete about it.. like what google is doing with robots, and the Deep Mind thing that Musk was (is?) invested in, and IBM has had Deep Blue for years.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby dinopello » Sat 22 Nov 2014, 11:13:00

Washington Post asks why is Musk so scared of the AI and killer robots? The Post provides no answer but has a good overview of some of Musks statement's:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n October: “With artificial intelligence we are summoning the demon. In all those stories where there’s the guy with the pentagram and the holy water, it’s like yeah he’s sure he can control the demon. Didn’t work out.”

In August: “We need to be super careful with AI. Potentially more dangerous than nukes.”

In June: “In the movie ‘Terminator,’ they didn’t create AI to — they didn’t expect, you know some sort of ‘Terminator’-like outcome. It is sort of like the ‘Monty Python’ thing: Nobody expects the Spanish inquisition. It’s just — you know, but you have to be careful.”

Musk wouldn’t even condone a plan to move to another planet to escape AI. “The AI will chase us there pretty quickly,” he said.


Musk thinks the robots will chase us right off the planet 8O
Image
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby dinopello » Sat 22 Nov 2014, 12:10:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'H')e's drinking his own Kool-Aid (tm).


Or he thinks the robot kool-aid man is coming for us :P

Image

I think his views are naive and he's quite gullible when it comes to techno-wizardry. But, he probably is not a bad guy.

AI is the ultimate siren song of technology and he has the bug. Let him try and develop a system rather than watching a staged demo and he'll wise up. I don't think he is stupid. The data volumes we have today is incredible, but the interpretive processing is not even infantile. Swimming in collection systems, drowning in data.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sat 22 Nov 2014, 17:23:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'I') think his views are naive and he's quite gullible when it comes to techno-wizardry. But, he probably is not a bad guy.


Yes, he's got a "gullible" streak. Some sort of naivite going on.

All these internet startup bazillionaires do.

Look at Zuckerberg, with his hoodies and how he's trapped forever just living the college years, the guy hasn't changed. He never put a suit on, and grew up, and stopped being "gullible."

At least Musk knows how to wear a suit when it's called for but still, he's part of this same crowd, these silicon valley geeks. They are naive, yes. But it's like, that's their advantage -- they innovated and created new things that none of us have -- you and me aren't naive Dino, but neither have we created $20 billion and hundreds of billions of dollars in wealth now have we?

It takes some gullible naivaite to bring "fresh eyes" to a problem or industry, and be stubborn / thick headed enough to just think you are right even when everyone else laughs.

All these guys are kinda weird. Old Steve Jobs, with the turtlenecks. Zuckerberg. Those two google guys. All of them are.

Of all them though, Musk got off the darn computer and he's the one that went out in the real world and figured out how to make ROCKETS and he made a car company, and he's building battery factores, and I read about a solar panel factory in New York.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sat 22 Nov 2014, 17:32:51

It's not the old, and world-wise that create Change and create new wealth.

The "wise" and old already have it all figured out -- why change it?

It takes the young, the NAIVE to change the world and do NEW things. And we all laugh about it all, but then in a few years we're all using their products aren't we? And they are billionaires, once derided and called naive and laughed at, aren't they?

I'm reminded of something in Zen. About "naivite." It's called "beginners mind." You want a degree of that gullibility, and naivite -- those really aren't the best words for it, the zen idea of "beginner's mind" is better. It's more like, fresh eyes, without all the "it can't be done / that's all hogwash" filters that get put on with experience and age.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')hoshin (初心) is a concept in Zen Buddhism meaning "beginner's mind". It refers to having an attitude of openness, eagerness, and lack of preconceptions when studying a subject, even when studying at an advanced level, just as a beginner in that subject would. The term is especially used in the study of Zen Buddhism and Japanese martial arts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoshin


That is exactly what Musk has done, in each industry he's stepped into -- he came at with a "beginners mind" and he's been laughed at the WHOLE TIME and EVERYONE said he's naive and "it can't be done."

Yet he does it. It works out. I don't know so much about tesla, but with spacex the approach paid off, he founded it with 100 million dollars of his paypal money and just over ten years later it's worth $10 billion. People have laughed at Musk the whole time, but they can't deny the oribtal sci rocket blow up on the pad, and now even Boeing says "Elon Musk helps keep us sharp, and makes us better."
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sat 22 Nov 2014, 17:41:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'A') bunch of backyard tinkerers developed the modern EV decades ago. Not must.


Well what's your point with that, Henry Ford didn't invent the automobile either -- he figured out a better way to MAKE an automobile, and a lot of them, and put an automobile in every family's driveway.

Musk didn't invent the rocket, he RE-INVENTED IT -- he made a better rocket, and cheaper.

And xerox invented the computer mouse, but it was Apple that made a computer people wanted to buy and have at home, with a mouse.

And Steve Jobs didn't invent the smartphone, either. I had a smartphone before anyone had ever heard of such a thing, it was an Audiovox and actually not too bad. It had a web browser. Was pretty darn awesome for the time. Cost me $500 bucks and everyone thought I was nuts to spend that on a phone, now many years later people think nothing of dropping half a grand on a iPhone.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sat 22 Nov 2014, 17:59:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'P')eople who were born on 3rd base and believe they hit a home run really bother me. Must neither developed the rocket nor the EV. My family developed the rocket with our tax dollars. We spent the nation's hard-earned money going to the moon decades ago. Musts little roman candle is a joke compared to the Apollo Missions.


What makes you think Musk "was born on third base?" He was born in South Africa.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')usk was born in Pretoria, South Africa,[21] to a Canadian-English mother and prominent model Maye Musk and a South African-born British father and electrical/mechanical engineer Errol Musk.[22][23][24] After his parents divorced in 1980, Musk lived mostly with his father in locations in South Africa.[25] He taught himself computer programming and at age 12 sold the computer code for a video game called Blastar for $500.

Musk attended Waterkloof House Preparatory School before graduating from Pretoria Boys High School and moving to Canada in 1988 at age 17, after obtaining Canadian citizenship through his mother.[27][28] He did so before his South African military service, reasoning that it would be easier to emigrate to the United States from Canada than from South Africa.[4][26][29]

In 1992, after spending two years at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario, Musk transferred to the University of Pennsylvania where he received a bachelor's degree in economics from the Wharton School. He stayed on a year to finish his second bachelor's degree in physics.[30] He moved to California to begin a PhD in applied physics at Stanford in 1995 but left the program after two days to pursue his entrepreneurial aspirations in the areas of the Internet, renewable energy and outer space.[26][31] In 2002, he became an American citizen.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elon_Musk


Doesn't sound like he was born "rich" and on "third base," though his father was an engineer.

Pstarr, he worked for what he has. He had a plan too, at a young age, first emigrate to Canada but that was to get to the US, he always wanted to come to America.

He didn't start out with millions in family money. It's the immigrant story, he worked for it. Is that what bothers us? Do we kind of kick ourselves that sometimes immigrants make more of America than we have?

Are we all a little bothered that we didn't think of "ebay" first, or a "paypal," or a "facebook?" Well, we didn't, these naive goofy geeks did, that's the dice. But you can't say someone like a Musk hasn't earned it -- he's earned it several times over, starting from scratch in several different industries.

I like Musk. For ONE THING, he's a *proud American*. He loves this country. Sometimes it's the immigrants that appreciate and love the USA, the most.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hich means we’re cheaper than the Chinese, cheaper than [the] Russians or anywhere else – and we’re doing it in the United States with American labour costs.

I’m nauseatingly pro-American. It is where great things are possible.
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Elon_Musk
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby dinopello » Sat 22 Nov 2014, 18:14:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', 'I') don't know so much about tesla, but with spacex the approach paid off, he founded it with 100 million dollars of his paypal money and just over ten years later it's worth $10 billion.


Yes, Musk is filthy rich and he is terrified of killer robots. Perhaps he should contribute to the legitimate groups that are trying to protect us ?

Image

But Musk thinks DeepMind is particularly dangerous

Image

Here's the type of stuff DeepMind can do. It's terrifying

Musk could clarify and say he was talking about military autonomous systems or malicious code (aka computer virus) but he really seems to be talking about singularity-like "superintelligence" which just makes him sound like an ignoramus.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sat 22 Nov 2014, 18:31:27

Well, say what you will of him, but other than Vladimir Putin -- Elon Musk is one of the few people on the planet that are in the news every single day:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')img]http://static6.businessinsider.com/image/546fcd17ecad04ab5b5fd47e-480-/gigafactory-3.jpg[/img]

Elon Musk On Tesla's Gigafactory: We Didn't Trick Nevada Into Anything

Tesla CEO Elon Musk has responded to critics of his plans to build a battery "gigafactory" in Nevada.

And he's not pulling any punches.

Musk defended his company's plans in a blog post entitled "The House Always Wins," a reference to casino gambling.

"There have been several articles recently implying that Tesla, through clever machinations, maneuvered Nevada into providing an overly large incentive package for the Gigafactory," said Musk.

...

Musk was presumably referring to an investigative report in Fortune that detailed how several states competed to build the factory by offering various incentives.

Musk noted that the state incentives for Tesla's factory were approved unanimously by Nevada's legislature.

"The deal is not merely slightly good for the people of Nevada, it is extremely good," said Musk.

The Tesla CEO denied receiving any cash from the state, but did acknowledge that his company had recieved a parcel of land from the deal.

"If you have been to Nevada, you will notice that there is quite a lot of extra land with nobody on it," he said. "This is not in short supply."

Musk said Nevada's contributions would only cover a small portion of the Gigafactory's cost.

"Of the $5 billion investment needed to bring the Gigafactory to full production in five years, state incentives will cover about 5%," he said.

That would value Nevada's contribution at about $250 million. The Fortune article said the "tally" for Nevada was $1.4 billion.

Musk also revealed that Nevada didn't write Tesla a blank check, so to speak.

"All of the incentives approved by the legislature are performance based," he said. "We must execute according to plan to receive them, meaning that, while the state and Tesla both share the upside, only Tesla suffers the downside."

Tesla has huge plans for this enormous facility in Nevada, and the company is making some major "forward-looking" claims about what it will be able to do.

Tesla put together a pdf with its future plans for the facility, claiming some major figures by 2020, including a vehicle volume of around half a million per year.

Image

Image
http://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-on-teslas-gigafactory-we-didnt-manipulate-nevada-into-anything-2014-11


Am I reading that graph right, that the gigafactory will be making more batteries than the rest of the world combined? 8O

And I don't know why Nevada is complaining, lol, state govs love elon Musk. Texas got a spaceport. They were stupid to let the gigafactory go to Nevada. All because Republicans think Musk and green energy is lefty nonsense. That was a mistake. R's need to open their eyes and see that this man is Hank Reardon, right out of Atlas Shrugged.

State govs love Musk. He's building a big solar panel factory in New York state.

Who else is doing all this, people? Who else?

He's employing Americans. Building new FACTORIES in the USA, building spaceports. Building all his stuff here, not in China, not in Mexico, not in Costa Rica or Honduras or Gutamala, or Sri Lanka, and no Russian parts and he minimizes outsourcing -- if he can make it in the USA, he does. Sometimes he has no choice, like the solar panel PV paper, he has to buy those from China, you can't compete on cost with that and that's why Solyndra failed and Musk is no idiot. But the rest of the panels, that's here in the US, and New York is getting a big factory thanks to Musk.
Last edited by Sixstrings on Sat 22 Nov 2014, 18:42:57, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby dinopello » Sat 22 Nov 2014, 18:39:44

Great, Musk's battery factory will be ready in 2020, right when Musk says the robots will kill us all and/or chase us off the planet. Isn't it obvious to him that they will use the batteries for their own purposes ? How smart is that ? Unless they are in control of him already...

Image
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sat 22 Nov 2014, 18:47:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'I')sn't it obvious to him that they will use the batteries for their own purposes ?


That's called hedging bets, that's good business. He'll sell batteries to the robots. :razz:

Funny thing about all this is that Musk will probably have the first sentient AI, or maybe google will get the first one, but Musk will have the second one so he can stare at it and give it a good talking to.

He's a bit of a demanding, difficult boss -- he may wind up loving his army of robots better than the human employees. :lol:

Okay can anyone energy / tech smarter than me opine on this gigafactory thing?

Am I wrong, I'm looking at that graph and it says it'll be making more batteries than the rest of the world? Is that not kind of cool, something you don't see every day, some new gigafactory in the good ole USA?

Aren't all the other greedy bean counter un-American globalist tools in business using Russian engines and building everything in China and Honduras?
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sat 22 Nov 2014, 19:58:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'A')s opposed to other AI's, such as IBM's Deepblue or Watson, which were developed for a pre-defined purpose and only function within its merit, DeepMind claims that their system is not pre-programmed: it learns from experience, using only raw pixels as data input.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')an we say hogwash, boys and girls??

Hogwash :razz:


How do you know it's hogwash? Can you link any journalism / analysis on it?

How do you just flat out call it "hogwash."

I have no reason to assume anything Musk is invested in is "hogwash." To the contrary, he's not an idiot when it comes to investment and money and whether something will work or not.

I'd just be curious to know if he is STILL invested in deepmind, and HOW MUCH. That would tell me a lot, how serious this thing is.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby dinopello » Sat 22 Nov 2014, 21:40:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'D')ude, if their system is 'not pre-programmed' then where does the 'intelligence' come from?


Image
It's that certain Je ne sais quoi !!!

The problem is one of communication and understanding. The system only takes as dynamic inputs the pixels - I believe that. And, it's a learning system, meaning that the same input at a later time may result in different behavior because the internal structure of the perception-reason-action model has been modified by a previous input. There are probably a lot of patterns stored so that the image understanding can be accomplished. There is also a whole lot of preprogramming involving the whole generate-test-outcome dynamic that allows the knowledge representation to adapt. Unless there is a randomizer element built in, though - starting from the same initial state, the same sequence of inputs will lead to the same sequence of actions. So, the system learns how to optimize the control for space invaders (after the rules of the game are programmed) but it is programmed exactly how it should learn. And of course this is a very limited domain. This is how laymen get the impression that something is intelligent. A flow chart might be more helpful.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sun 23 Nov 2014, 01:28:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'T')he problem is one of communication and understanding. The system only takes as dynamic inputs the pixels - I believe that. And, it's a learning system, meaning that the same input at a later time may result in different behavior because the internal structure of the perception-reason-action model has been modified by a previous input. There are probably a lot of patterns stored so that the image understanding can be accomplished. There is also a whole lot of preprogramming involving the whole generate-test-outcome dynamic that allows the knowledge representation to adapt. Unless there is a randomizer element built in, though - starting from the same initial state, the same sequence of inputs will lead to the same sequence of actions. So, the system learns how to optimize the control for space invaders (after the rules of the game are programmed) but it is programmed exactly how it should learn. And of course this is a very limited domain. This is how laymen get the impression that something is intelligent. A flow chart might be more helpful.


Yes, and a piece of software than learn will be worth tens of billions, who knows how much.

That's just step one of sentient AI.

But that one step.. is big.. that's what I'm talking about when I talk about a stuxnet 2.0. Imagine those kind of viruses, where they can adapt and evolve, and then someone just setting that kind of thing loose.

Imagine the cyberwar implications.

A LEARNING virus or attack algorithm could just keep trying different things until it finds what works, like picking a lock, and adapting to countermeasures.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sun 23 Nov 2014, 01:34:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'D')ude, if their system is 'not pre-programmed' then where does the 'intelligence' come from? Six, you need to stop buying into the hype. They'll get into your pockets and then where will you be? Penniless, friendless, without a home. So sad :cry:


The intelligence is the ability to learn and adapt.

From wiki on AI:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t is an academic field of study which studies the goal of creating intelligence, whether in emulating human-like intelligence or not. Major AI researchers and textbooks define this field as "the study and design of intelligent agents",[1] where an intelligent agent is a system that perceives its environment and takes actions that maximize its chances of success.[2] John McCarthy, who coined the term in 1955,[3] defines it as "the science and engineering of making intelligent machines".[4]


Now that's not *sentient* intelligence, mind you, or self-aware.

A rudimentary "alive" intelligence would be some software that has a priority for survival, and then the ability to see what works and what doesn't, and then learn, to achieve the objective (survival).

And that's evolution.

Or, the objective is not survival, but to do the task set to it: i.e. stuxnet's task was to sneak into the Iranian nuke program computers and then get into the centrifuges, and hide, and send bogus info if detected to cover its tracks, and then when conditions were right to spin those centrifuges very fast to destroy them. And if that failed, it had back-up attack angles.

AI research is important, for all kinds of things, so that computers can handle dynamic unknown changing conditions on their own.

I.E., deep space probes, like the one going to Pluto. That's so far out there that it can't be controlled on the fly, probes and rovers need some AI to handle themselves and dynamic situations.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron