by Graeme » Thu 14 Aug 2014, 00:06:38
Obama doubles down on threat to act against 'tax inversions' by US firms
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n the wake of a rare tactical victory for the White House, Barack Obama on Wednesday evening defended his threat to use controversial presidential powers to prevent companies from avoiding US taxes.
In his first public comments on the subject since Walgreens amended a takeover deal that would have moved the enlarged company to a lower tax jurisdiction in the UK or Switzerland, the president warned other US companies considering so-called “tax inversion” strategies that he would look at fresh ways to take executive action to clamp down on the growing practice.
Although the administration’s legal authority to change tax rules without legislation from Congress is limited, the threat of White House interference hung over Walgreens’ takeover talks with smaller UK partner Alliance Boots and appears to have been a major factor in the company’s decision to keep the combined group’s headquarters in Chicago after it completes the deal.
Attempts to tackle the issue in Congress are stalled and Republicans have attacked Obama’s growing use of executive action in place of legislation as a breach of the constitution, and launched a lawsuit against him out of the House of Representatives over the issue.
At a press conference in Washington on Thursday, an undeterred president said he would continue to seek to counter future inversion strategies just as aggressively and stood by his use of executive action as a tactic to deal with Republican opposition in Congress.
theguardianHow to stop the inversion perversion$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he real solution is to lower the corporate rate, eliminate tax breaks and move America from a worldwide system to a territorial one. Barack Obama has proposed a reform that cuts the rate to 28% but keeps the worldwide reach. Dave Camp, a Republican congressman, has plumped for 25%, the OECD average, and a shift to a territorial system, instead.
It should be possible to bridge the differences. But both sides have tied the subject to other issues. Mr Obama insists that corporate-tax reform must also raise more money to spend on things like public infrastructure, which the Republicans oppose; they, in turn, want to package it with cuts in personal tax rates, which Mr Obama is loth to accept. Thus, nothing happens.
The two sides should drop their conditions and hammer out a stand-alone corporate-tax reform that reduces the rate and broadens the base. Until then, expect the line-up of corporate migrants to grow.