Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Space The Final Frontier!

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Space OTSF: What if there is no happy ending; an ecologi

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Thu 07 Nov 2013, 04:21:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Subjectivist', 'h')ttp://www.adn.com/2013/11/04/3157985/study-88-billion-earth-sized-just.html


Thanks for trying. However these folks have a sicko doomer cult thing going on. They absolutely will not stand for anyone suggesting that the smarter folks will leave this planet while the rest of them will perish among their own waste products.

As for the 8.8 Billion Earth-type planets, that is only those in the habitable temperature zone. Then you have to look for an atmosphere, the right combination of elements to support life, and then life itself. The end number is smaller than 8.8 billion, but hard to estimate.

Because one cannot "Terra-form" or "Geo-engineer" an entire planet, there is a problem of scale, and it would take a geological age. You can do anything you want in smaller-scale space habitats, perhaps the humans will discover that the surface of a planet full of hostile bacteria, animals, and other organisms is not the place they wish to live.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: Space OTSF: What if there is no happy ending; an ecologi

Unread postby ralfy » Thu 07 Nov 2013, 06:55:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'Y')ou appear to be reading half my posts and understanding rather less. I don't believe the "fast crash" scenario.

I mentioned that the end of the world, the mass extinction we are in now, has been going on for over a millenium. It was not technology that killed the world, it was Agriculture and Medicine. When Kunstler called his book about the Oil Peak The Long Emergency, he was certainly correct.

Space colonies a millenium from now are still soon enough. Meanwhile I have done far more than my share of making it possible for more people to live longer using less resources, while having one child.

My career could be either a service or a curse depending upon your point of view. To a Gaia worshiper, engineers would be the devil incarnate, enabling the further rape of the planet. To a Technologist, I have been a success, lived my life according to my beliefs, and I know it.


Actually, the types of agriculture practiced and medicine are examples of technology.
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland

Re: Space OTSF: What if there is no happy ending; an ecologi

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Thu 07 Nov 2013, 07:04:46

KJ is the biggest jerk on this site in years. Makes Shorty seem humble and humorous.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Space OTSF: What if there is no happy ending; an ecologi

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Thu 07 Nov 2013, 12:13:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'B')ecause one cannot "Terra-form" or "Geo-engineer" an entire planet, there is a problem of scale, and it would take a geological age.


I think that would be relatively easy, compared to the problem of getting there.

(We are already un-Terraforming Earth :( )
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands

Re: Space OTSF: What if there is no happy ending; an ecologi

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Thu 07 Nov 2013, 16:32:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Keith_McClary', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'B')ecause one cannot "Terra-form" or "Geo-engineer" an entire planet, there is a problem of scale, and it would take a geological age.


I think that would be relatively easy, compared to the problem of getting there.

(We are already un-Terraforming Earth :( )


If that were true, there would not be any discussion about whether AGW is real or not. We are at the end of a 150-year period where we have burned a lot of oil and coal, and we can't even agree if the climate has changed as a result of that activity.

Nor does it matter. What DOES matter very much is that when we run out of cheap oil to burn, a lot of us are going to starve.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland
Top

Re: Space OTSF: What if there is no happy ending; an ecologi

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Fri 08 Nov 2013, 07:16:32

Your ego won't let you admit the truth- it is human to be part right and part wrong. You get a few things right, so you think you have it all right. "Clean Comfortable" = bullshit sales pitch. Anyone interested in some Mars RE? Or perhaps a share in the Boston Bridge?
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Space OTSF: What if there is no happy ending; an ecologi

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Fri 08 Nov 2013, 07:56:47

SG, for the greater good of the Forum I have decided that I will not exchange insults with you. I have politely asked you not to behave as you are doing in several threads. My impressions of you and your intellect slip a little bit each time we have one of these conversations. Perhaps you should reflect upon that for a few moments.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: Space OTSF: What if there is no happy ending; an ecologi

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Fri 08 Nov 2013, 13:10:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'S')G, for the greater good of the Forum I have decided that I will not exchange insults with you.
I don't think SG's comment is any more insulting than your post preceding it.
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Space The Final Frontier!

Unread postby Tanada » Fri 08 Nov 2013, 15:02:18

Space The Final Frontier!
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Space The Final Frontier!

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Sun 10 Nov 2013, 01:50:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ralfy', '
')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'S')o can we focus on what is important and leave the irrelevancies aside? What is important is that we will run out of that wonderful dense form of concentrated sunlight that we call fossil fuels, and (at least) 3/4ths of the human race will starve. I consider that a little more important than some rich folks losing beach-front real estate or me having to add a few days of A/C use. Global Warming has more positive aspects than negative ones, for sure.

What is important is to realize that the response to peak oil is the same as the response to AGW
In KJ thinking that is asteroid mining and space colonies.
Image
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Russia says sanctions puts space station astronauts at risk

Unread postby Sixstrings » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 21:43:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')n a visit to Russia's Cold War ally Cuba, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said the sanctions lacked "all common sense".

US moves to restrict high-tech exports to Russia appeared to cause particular fury, with Rogozin warning Washington was "exposing their astronauts on the ISS".

The International Space Station is operated jointly by Russia, the United States, Europe, Japan and Canada.

Astronauts and cosmonauts depend on Russian Soyuz rockets to ferry them between it and Earth, ever since NASA scrapped its space shuttles in 2011.
http://news.yahoo.com/us-reviving-iron-curtain-policies-russia-094611975.html


Drudgereport has this headlined as "Russia threatens astronauts," but reading this, do they have a point? I would tend to think tech export sanctions would exclude anything they really need for Soyuz launches.

Or is it just more air and more BS? Would they purposely threaten to hold back Soyuz resupply / recovery missions to the space station and Putin's bullying extends into space?

At least SpaceX is able to do deliveries, and that one other private company. Congress should throw some big money at SpaceX real fast, and get the Dragon crew capsule ready.

(This whole thing is ludicrous and I don't see how Russia can win it, I saw a thing on CNN about Miami and how it's the new "Russian riviera" and all the oligarchs love to live there and park their money in the US. Russians like Miami. Russians love the US. Push comes to shove, Putin would have to back down, rich Russians don't want to be stuck in Sochi or Beijing, let's get real.)
Last edited by Sixstrings on Tue 29 Apr 2014, 21:57:06, edited 4 times in total.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Russia says sanctions puts space station astronauts at r

Unread postby Subjectivist » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 21:53:27

Both ESA and Japan have the cargo modules and have used them longbefore the "private sector" american companies ever got off the ground. The real concern is nothing to do with cargo, it is all about crew. If we are POing Russia why would they ferry our astronauts to the station for us? We had a viable space shuttle capability to send our own crew members but the remaining shuttles have all been put into museums by the President. It isn't their fault we scrapped our space transport system that w spent hundreds of billions developing and perfecting, that was our decision not theirs.
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Subjectivist
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4705
Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 07:38:26
Location: Northwest Ohio

Re: Russia says sanctions puts space station astronauts at r

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 22:05:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Subjectivist', ' ')If we are POing Russia why would they ferry our astronauts to the station for us?


Because we pay them?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Subjectivist', 'W')e had a viable space shuttle capability to send our own crew members but the remaining shuttles have all been put into museums by the President..... that was our decision not theirs.


Its hardly fair to say that it was "our" decision. Obama lied about supporting the space program just like he lied about cutting the deficit and many other things----and then after he was elected he killed the shuttle program--the responsibility for killing the US space shuttle program falls entirely on Obama.

Image
Last edited by Plantagenet on Tue 29 Apr 2014, 22:28:34, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Russia says sanctions puts space station astronauts at r

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Wed 30 Apr 2014, 12:18:39

"The White House said on Monday the United States would deny export licences for any high-technology items that could aid Russian military capabilities and revoke existing licences."

I wonder how this will affect the Ukraine military/aerospace industry, which is highly integrated with Russia. Will the US block exports to Ukrainian companies that sell to Russia?
Ukrainian defence industry 'unaffected' by crisis with Russia
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n addition to offering repair and overhaul facilities to international customers (MiG-23 'Flogger', MiG-27 'Flogger-D', and Aero L-39 Albatross aircraft are also serviced), Ukraine has a number of military aerospace programmes in which it is partnered with Russia. These include co-development of the Antonov An-70 transport aircraft, as well as the supply of engines for the Yakovlev Yak-130 'Mitten' jet trainer aircraft, the Mi-26 'Halo' heavy-lift helicopter, and the Beriev Be-200 amphibious aircraft. JSC Motor Sich also provides the powerplants for platforms manufactured by Russian Helicopters.

Indeed, Russia's renewed participation in and financial underpinning of the An-70 programme was dependent on Ukraine turning its back on the EU association agreement that sparked the recent popular uprising in Kiev. The decision to restart production of the Antonov An-124 'Condor' strategic transport aircraft had more to do with relations between the two countries than Russia's airlift needs.
...
Ukraine currently has about 200 programmes and programme elements that are sourced from Russia. These are valued at USD138 million per year (out of Ukraine's total procurement spend of about USD500 million), and cover aerospace, maritime, and land systems.
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: Russia says sanctions puts space station astronauts at r

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 16 May 2014, 00:42:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', 'N')othing would serve Russian ego better than seeing SpaceX rush a manned flight and kill an astronaut.


Speaking of which:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Rocket Carrying Russia's Most Advanced Communications Satellite Crashes During Take Off

Two days ago Russia retaliated against US sanctions by banning the US from using the International Space Station after 2020, and by barring the use of Russian rockets as launch vehicles for US military satellites. Then, moments ago, a Russian Proton rocket, carrying Russia's most advanced and powerful satellite on board, crashed on take off, during the activation of the third rocket stage some 9 minutes into the launch. Coincidence? Surely.

So an emergency engine shutdown? Was the shutdown activated by a certain Fort Meade agency by any chance? We hope to find out shortly, because whether this was indeed industrial sabotage or will simply be spun as one (to avoid the stigma of incompetence)?

To be sure, if the Kremlin finds a microchip with "Stuxnet wuz here" etched into the Gallium-Arsenide, things are about to get even more interesting.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-15/rocket-carrying-russias-most-advanced-communications-satellite-crashes-take


Oh I just noticed this. The rocket was carrying Glonass:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he Russian government launch was carrying three satellites for the GLONASS navigation system.


I started another thread on that. GLONASS is that GPS thing Congress thinks is for spying and won't let Russia install it in the US, and so Russia is going to remove US GPS stations from Russia.

And now their GLONASS launch blows up.

I don't want to be as paranoid as ZH, but that is odd. 8O
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Russia says sanctions puts space station astronauts at r

Unread postby Subjectivist » Wed 21 May 2014, 06:55:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Subjectivist', 'W')e had a viable space shuttle capability to send our own crew members but the remaining shuttles have all been put into museums by the President. It isn't their fault we scrapped our space transport system that w spent hundreds of billions developing and perfecting, that was our decision not theirs.


I criticized this at the time, but actually Obama admin turned out right and it's worked out. SpaceX can do all this cheaper, better, and safer. Dragon capsule is ready except for the required emergency crew escape system. Sooooo, given developments with Russia really Congress needs to throw some big money at Elon Musk. Let's get on the ball, Dragon capsule is closest to being ready. I love SpaceX, they're going to outcompete Russia and Europe and China on price and do big things.

Musk has always been aggressive about competing with Russia, saying it's shameful we ever needed Russians to get us to space in the first place. I wouldn't use that kind of language, but hey, if we've got a cold war on then we need some pro-American can-do attitude.


You completely missed my point, as usual. I loved the Space Shuttle until I figured out what a Nixonian boon doggle it actually was, but throwing it away before we had a working replacement was stupid and short sighted.
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Subjectivist
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4705
Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 07:38:26
Location: Northwest Ohio
Top

Re: Russia says sanctions puts space station astronauts at r

Unread postby AgentR11 » Mon 02 Jun 2014, 17:52:54

There is a bit of hyperbole involved, but I think the underlying message is that we are parting ways when it comes to how to pursue space. I don't think the Russian's have ever gotten their "money's worth" out of ISS, and perhaps never really had their hearts in it. They had years of manned station time before ISS was operational, other than, "ooh look, pretty white paint in space...", not much to get excited about.

I do think the Russians and Chinese have the right attitude about space to succeed at something we are unwilling to do. Mars... go... and do *not* return. When you start designing a mission that doesn't require lifting a human off of Mars, and replace all that mass of extra metal and fuel with water and supplies and equipment, you go from sci-fi speculation, to CAN DO NOW.

That's my hunch anyway.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Subjectivist', 'Y')ou completely missed my point, as usual. I loved the Space Shuttle until I figured out what a Nixonian boon doggle it actually was, but throwing it away before we had a working replacement was stupid and short sighted.


Sometimes the dead weight you're tied to is so massive, you have to cast it off in order to move on to better things.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Russia says sanctions puts space station astronauts at r

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Mon 28 Jul 2014, 01:54:10

End dawns for Europe's space cargo delivery role$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')urope will close an important chapter in its space flight history Tuesday, launching the fifth and final robot ship it had pledged for lifeline deliveries to the International Space Station.
The 20-tonne Automated Transfer Vehicle (ATV) dubbed Georges Lemaitre, the size of a double-decker bus, is set to blast off from South America with fuel, water, oxygen, food, clean clothes and 50 kilogrammes (110 pounds) of coffee for six Earth-orbiting astronauts.
...
The craft will carry nearly 6.6 tonnes of supplies for the orbital outpost and its occupants, including 850 litres of drinking water—the most ever, and three tonnes of fuel.
...
50 kilogrammes of coffee to "rejuvenate" the crew
...
Since there is no washing machine in space, the robot craft will bring underwear, socks and clean clothes
...
All met their operational objectives, somewhat muting criticism of the programme's total 4.2 billion-euro ($5.6 billion) cost.
So that's a $billion per launch of 6.6 tonnes each. $150,000 per kilogram. $7,500,000 for coffee. I presume that's instant coffee. When they've used that up they'll have to get used to
Image
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Sounds in Space

Unread postby Graeme » Tue 05 Aug 2014, 19:19:33

NASA Probes Record Sounds In Space – And It’s Terrifying.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')espite what you’ve heard, there are actual sounds in space.

Due to the virtual vacuum in space, it’s not sound like you and I experience it (that being waves pulsing through the air), but there are electromagnetic waves that pulsate at the same wavelength as the sound waves we can hear.

Instruments on several NASA probes including Voyager have recorded these waves and translated them into a sound that we can hear, and they are all kinds of spooky. This is the kind of thing you hear in a movie just before someone opens a door in a dark hallway.

So, take a listen to the true nature of the solar system. And sleep tight.


thedailyepic
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand
Top

Re: Sounds in Space

Unread postby Newfie » Tue 05 Aug 2014, 20:04:55

Cool, thanks.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron