Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Making vs Serving

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Making vs Serving

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 11:23:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', ' ')What we don't need are more ... brilliant minds.


We always need more brilliant minds.

I don't understand why the disparagement about typical people doing service jobs and now about brilliant people doing brilliant cientific, engineering and artistic work.

Colin Campbell and good ol' King Hubbert were brilliant minds. Steve Jobs and Einstein were brilliant minds. Bill Gates is over-rated as programmer but his charity work is well-meaning. Thank god for brilliant minds.

The whole idea of an open, capitalist society is that people are free to try to do what they choose to do, given the real-world limits of available, jobs, time, etc.

Some succeed, some fail. Some are brilliant, some are dopes. Thats the way life works.

Image
We always need more brilliant minds.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Making vs Serving

Unread postby Strummer » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 12:51:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'S')teve Jobs and Einstein were brilliant minds.


A extremely rich man who tries to cure his (fully treatable) cancer with homeopathy and loses his life as a result, is an idiot, not a brilliant mind.
Strummer
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 691
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2013, 04:42:14

Re: Making vs Serving

Unread postby Tanada » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 13:06:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Strummer', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'S')teve Jobs and Einstein were brilliant minds.


A extremely rich man who tries to cure his (fully treatable) cancer with homeopathy and loses his life as a result, is an idiot, not a brilliant mind.


Even a genius can lack wisdom, look at all the very intelligent scientists of the past who were chain smokers or heavy drinkers or both. Heck the story of Jekyl and Hyde was really about what happened to perfectly rational doctors who become addicted to drugs and was based loosely on events of the time. IV drugs were a whole new scientific discovery and they destroyed a lot of lives before it was realized how very addictive and dangerous they are.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Making vs Serving

Unread postby Narz » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 13:35:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'N')arz wrote:
"Service jobs are the future. Stuff, stuff & more stuff is not sustainable."

The facts are exactly the opposite, which is my entire point: The unsustainable part is the cheap fossil energy that makes stuff of value, allowing us to do graphics and dance in the subway.

There have always been people who've made their living entertaining.

You talk about facts as if you have some. It's all speculation that we're all going to go back to being farmings cause fossil fuels will go into decline & we'll just panic & technology/culture/society will retreat back into some Amish paradise or MadMax scenario (depending on your kink)

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'T')he service economy that has grown in tandem with fossil fuels and population is an artifact of cheap fossil energy, not some great lasting invention of human ingenuity as economists (a "science" that's grown right along with FFs) would have us believe. How can that be more clear?

Like global warming is correlated with lack of pirates? This argument that everything we've ever done can be attributed to fossil fuels is tired. We had the Renaissance without fossil fuels. We found fossil fuels, they didn't find us. Humans will do our damdest to keep progress going (and when I say progress I mean technological, obviously there are environment & social inequities which may just kill us all).

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', '&')quot;is joy wealth?"
I hate to say it but: LOL

It's easy to be a hippy when you have a trust fund. It's easy to be a slacker when you'll not starve, it's easy to smell the roses when you're not pulling turnips, LOL. This is the perfect example of my point; that people actually believe we need a new metric for wealth because FFs have made tangibles like turnips a given.

But turnips are a given in the first world? Why do you hate that so much? It's like you can't wait to go back to a world where man is beholden to nature, suffering with floods & drought. Living hand to mouth sucks & thruout the world wherever people are given another option they take it. A few outcasts can glamorize the hand to mouth lifestyle & pine for it but humanity will destroy itself rather than go back to it. It's all or nothing baby.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'T')he only problem is cheap energy isn't a given.

Nope but we're kind of used to it. When the going gets tough we're not just going to roll over & die. Fossil fuel addiction has made us complacent. Withdrawal will make us resourceful.
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)
Top

Re: Making vs Serving

Unread postby dinopello » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 14:37:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Narz', ' ')We had the Renaissance without fossil fuels.


The Renaissance was awesome and all, but it was immediately preceded by the black death that wiped out a third of the population of europe. I imagine whatever resources there were being used at the time became more available and cheaper. So, maybe we will have another Renaissance 8O

In part this thread seems to be about "what is wealth" but also what humanity aspires to be. One founder had a notion of the aspirational progression :

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '&')quot;I must study politics and war, that our sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy. Our sons ought to study mathematics and philosophy, geography, natural history and naval architecture, navigation, commerce and agriculture in order to give their children a right to study painting, poetry, music, architecture, statuary, tapestry and porcelain.”
-John Adams


Painting, poetry and music are strictly speaking "making" things so I guess Adams would agree with that value premise of the thread. But I think the point is that these were viewed by Adams as the highest things humanity could aspire to be making. The irony is that we in the US are now (due to our energy slaves) quite capable of having just about everyone work less (at whatever their job) and write poetry but instead people work long hours for little pay as Walmart greeters. That wasn't in Adams progressional all.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: Making vs Serving

Unread postby Pops » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 14:43:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Narz', 'Y')ou talk about facts as if you have some. It's all speculation that we're all going to go back to being farmings cause fossil fuels will go into decline & we'll just panic & technology/culture/society will retreat back into some Amish paradise or MadMax scenario (depending on your kink)

Sorry to pee on your strawman but I've said exactly the opposite for 10 years, most recently in the 'How is ag going to work' thread the last couple of days. Instead of trying to psychoanalyze my "kink" and poke me in the eye, try responding to my idea. Start with disproving the link I've drawn between the increase in FF use, population and the service economy.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e found fossil fuels, they didn't find us. Humans will do our damdest to keep progress going.

Of course we will. The point here (this thread and this site) is FFs have made our lives easy and their decline will make our lives harder. If you think there is a replacement around the corner why in the world are you wasting your time here?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut turnips are a given in the first world? Why do you hate that so much?
yada yada, ad hom, blah
.
Again with the ad homs. Is that all you've got?

I've proposed the simple idea that FFs are the reason for the expansion of the service economy and that the end of cheap FFs will reverse the trend. You've done nothing but toss ad homs at me instead of addressing the topic.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Making vs Serving

Unread postby Pops » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 15:02:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'T')he irony is that we in the US are now (due to our energy slaves) quite capable of having just about everyone work less (at whatever their job) and write poetry but instead people work long hours for little pay as Walmart greeters. That wasn't in Adams progressional all.


Check.

One of the ideas in the back of my mind when I started thinking about this thread was the current vibe around here about how capitalism has brought us to this point of stratification, the worsening bargaining position of workers and the rise in low wage service jobs. I don't want to get this thread off on another Karl Marx tangent (heaven knows) but I think the fall in the value of labor is more a result of competition from energy scabs than from the sucess of the "I built that" choir.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Making vs Serving

Unread postby Sixstrings » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 15:52:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'M')y question is simple, where does the money come from to pay the barber and the travel agent and cell phone bill?


Travel agents lost their jobs a long time ago, thanks to the internet. Which we all love, of course -- who really wants to schlepp into a travel agency and talk to a nice lady and give her a living selling you that ticket? When your computer / smart phone can do it for you, and you never leave home?

Cell phones -- they don't employ many. It's computers. Networks.

Barbers -- well that's still there, until robots can do it.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') really don't get this because it seems to me that going to a restaurant is a way to "spend" value, whereas building a widget or growing a crop is a way to "make" value. Services are intangibles you pay for when you've "made" some money making something tangible.


I'd disagree in that service / intellectual work is just as tangible as the making. The *machines* have been doing the *making*, for a long time now, starting with steam power. That has continued to ATMs and no more tellers, no video stores, and now days surgery robots (won't be long before the robot can do it without the human surgeon at all).

Software and robotics will replace all jobs, all that will be left are paper pushing / creative work. The interesting question for me is what happens after the singularity, and AI can do the creative too? It can only end in a new kind of communism, as I've concluded before. Which isn't a bad thing.

Just is what it is, if robots and AI can do all the work then people don't have to anymore.

But it's going to get rougher and rougher on the way there, with ever greater levels of efficiency and automation and the jobs increasingly just are not there yet conservatives won't recognize this fact and there's no social income distribution system.

Random exmaple I've given before: Walmart checkouts, my local one has selfcheckouts now so there went half those cashier jobs. Nobody wants to be a cashier, but they were jobs, so what happens when these service jobs are gone in the service economy.

Heck, didn't someone just post about a 3d printer making a whole house a few hours? Expect more of that.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Making vs Serving

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 16:12:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'I') think we've become so efficient at supplying the basic needs (and luxury items for that matter) of everyone we simply do not need more makers.

Thanks for making the point I was going to make. Very few factories can make the entire world's supply of things like peanut butter or DVD players. Just like farming is now a tiny part of the first world economy (like it or not) thanks to efficiencies from agro-business.

So for the FIRST world, where people aren't starving due to the government safety net, etc (despite left wings claims to the contrary):

Once there is plenty of wealth to go beyond things like eating and basic clothing and housing,etc. -- then people get to make CHOICES of what they want to spend their money on. It's the upside of wealth (and the downside for the planet, since we choose not to socialize all the costs).

As a male who only shops for clothes at Walmart -- I'm pretty sure things like "Lee's Press-On Nails" are things I could live without. On the other hand, I spend a lot of time, money, and energy on cardboard, playing "Magic The Gathering" -- basically a card game with at least as much complexity as chess, with a social element as well.

I don't see why a myriad of "products" like this (which are really services -- to make us look better or have fun) is more important than. say, getting a hair cut or putting fancy lights on our cars to attract attention.

Now the third world, where people are starving and lack basic medical care -- that's a whole different kettle of fish. If people breed faster than the economy grows -- I don't know how you fix that.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY
Top

Re: Making vs Serving

Unread postby Pops » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 16:22:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', 'J')ust is what it is, if robots and AI can do all the work then people don't have to anymore.

You miss the entire point, six, industry consumes nearly as much energy as transportation, residential and commercial uses combined.

Do you think robots require no energy?
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Making vs Serving

Unread postby ralfy » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 16:23:37

The money used to pay for services comes from increasing credit from banks and other financial institutions that control the global economy:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg2 ... world.html

The reason why various services are said to have value is because the global economy itself is measured in terms of money.

That money is used as part of consumer spending for a growing global middle class:

http://www.bbc.com/news/business-22956470

The present middle class can only sustain its living standards by selling to that expanding market, which in turn requires increasing amounts of material resources and energy.
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland

Re: Making vs Serving

Unread postby Simon_R » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 16:26:49

Hi Pops

I am nearly convinced, but you seem to be drawing the conclusion that
the rise in spending on services is a result of cheap energy.

Could this not also be reflecting a consumer trend. We still need stuff
but people prefer services than stuff ?
Maybe because they cannot afford the stuff.

I agree that provisions of non essential products and services are
reliant on cheap energy, but I am not convinced that cheap energy
predicates these services.

however I do not have a different theory to yours

As for the renaissance, that was the sacking of constantinople
(a real 'doh' moment) and cross pollinization of ideas, nothing to do
with energy.

Can we do away with turnips, I saw a horse drawn beetroot planter, so if we
are to progress to a bucolic paradise, I would be gratefull if we could
go the beetroot .... route

Simon
Simon_R
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Thu 16 May 2013, 09:28:06

Re: Making vs Serving

Unread postby Narz » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 16:32:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'P')ainting, poetry and music are strictly speaking "making" things so I guess Adams would agree with that value premise of the thread.

I'm not sure Pops would consider those "things" or wealth. Music (certainly in Adams time) was a service. Poetry also is more of a service, certainly for most of history (before Gutenberg).
Last edited by Narz on Tue 29 Apr 2014, 16:42:07, edited 1 time in total.
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)
Top

Re: Making vs Serving

Unread postby Narz » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 16:39:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 't')ry responding to my idea. Start with disproving the link I've drawn between the increase in FF use, population and the service economy.

Obviously fossil fuels has helped the economic & population explosion, no doubt. I'm not arguing that. But it doesn't follow that fossil fuels are the only possible way civilization can maintain itself @ our current level.

There's no way to "disprove" this because it's just your opinion. TIme will tell. :)

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'O')f course we will. The point here (this thread and this site) is FFs have made our lives easy and their decline will make our lives harder. If you think there is a replacement around the corner why in the world are you wasting your time here?

Inertia I guess. I mean you guys might be right, but I'm no longer on the choir. I think climate change is a far more worrisome issue in my lifetime.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'ve proposed the simple idea that FFs are the reason for the expansion of the service economy and that the end of cheap FFs will reverse the trend. You've done nothing but toss ad homs at me instead of addressing the topic.

I've addressed the topic. I think a service economy is a good thing. And of course I think you're wrong, that we're never going to go back to a mostly goods based economy. Again, time will tell. Sorry if I came off as a jerk. It's just, imo, you're not really open to discussion yourself.
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)
Top

Re: Making vs Serving

Unread postby Simon_R » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 16:51:09

If poetry can be classed as 'making things' why cannot making 'a profit' be classed as making something.
Simon_R
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Thu 16 May 2013, 09:28:06

Re: Making vs Serving

Unread postby Pops » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 17:01:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Simon_R', 'H')i Pops

I am nearly convinced, but you seem to be drawing the conclusion that
the rise in spending on services is a result of cheap energy.

Could this not also be reflecting a consumer trend. We still need stuff
but people prefer services than stuff ?


I think that is exactly right, Simon. Of course we want to have a chef prepare a spectacular meal and someone to cart away the dishes, guide us on our European tour, change Pops' depends, airbrush our tan, provide our connectivity and apps.

The glitch is it takes 100 energy slaves to doing the heavy lifting for each of us rich worlders that allows us to enjoy all that and Spotify too. People have always aspired to avoiding work, it's what we do, without that inventiveness we'd still be wandering around in the bushes eating grubs and periodically starving.

It isn't that modern life is bad or that a service economy that caters to my every whim isn't awesome, the problem is the service economy is the result of cheap energy doing the grubbing in the mud. It's not the sole fruit of capitalism or our vast brains as we'd like to believe.

When the energy slaves are gone someone's going to have to go back to work.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Making vs Serving

Unread postby Narz » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 17:06:21

I'm still confused as to why a service economy is so lamentable.

Services make people happier than goods, services don't rot in landfills. Do we really want to go back to the era of slaving away in factories. These are jobs for robots, as sixstrings said, not people. Let robots due the gruntwork so humans can focus on art & grander things. No one wants to live a drab life like the Amish unless it's the only option.

Ok, robots use power, our current #1 power source is fossil fuels, therefore our only option is to go back to doing everything manually in preparation for powerdown. I used to be sold on the math there (somehow) & I still see a value in preparation & a satisfaction in being able to do certain things without machinery. But to say it's definitely gonna be the future & soon no one will have time for anything but making sh!t... well, ok, it's a prediction, like 99% of those on peakoil.com I suspect it will be wrong.
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)

Re: Making vs Serving

Unread postby Narz » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 17:09:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'W')hen the energy slaves are gone someone's going to have to go back to work.

Or we could just ramp up efficiency. Nearly half of all energy is wasted right now. I suspect most of those reading this have lights left on that don't need to be.

It used to take a computer the size of a bunkbed all sorts of energy to calculate simple addition, now a computer can do a million calculations a second on less energy than a lightbulb.
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)
Top

Re: Making vs Serving

Unread postby Pops » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 17:11:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Narz', 'S')orry if I came off as a jerk. It's just, imo, you're not really open to discussion yourself.

No prob, Narz.
They're just ideas to think about and bat around.
It's the internet, you can't "win" LOL
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Making vs Serving

Unread postby dinopello » Tue 29 Apr 2014, 17:13:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Narz', 'I')t used to take a computer the size of a bunkbed all sorts of energy to calculate simple addition, now a computer can do a million calculations a second on less energy than a lightbulb.


And now there are several billion computers out there consuming electricity, but doing important stuff like Angry Birds.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron