by Quinny » Mon 30 Dec 2013, 12:22:13
I've always found the FT to be reasonably informative, but obviously with a very right wing bias. The british tabloids are terrible, the worst IMHO being the Daily Mail and Daily Express which appear to give a 'sensible' POV but are actually incredibly biased and peddle more garbage than the Sun Mirror and Star which don't really pretend not to be comics.
Now in France, I am very impressed with the newspapers particularly at a regional level. Radio is also excellent though challenging. TV however is different.............
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'A')nother retweet from the Outrage Of The Day propaganda machine.
Hope this isn't too divergent; but American news, both left and right is absolutely dominated by "outrage of the day" type articles, meant to drive click counts and comment posts which cause more click counts and more advertising revenue.
Recently... I did something, myself, about it. I subscribed to a news source whose articles are, for whatever reason, completely lacking any of the "outrage" pieces. They're just missing. If there is any hint at an underlying source of one, its very muted, and with no word choices that would provoke anything more than a vague, "that's odd" comment.
Yes.. I subscribed to the Financial Times of London.
I am finding it a bit hard to go cold turkey from my daily dose of outrage, but I scold myself when I open the google/drudge news article accumulators.... Instead of outrage, the articles are dry, information filled, and couldn't provoke an emotional response from an unstable psychopath. Much less entertaining, but much more informative.
Not saying FT would be appropriate for all, but surely there is a suitable, but dispassionate source of informational reporting available, if one were to seek it out.
It will be less fun to read though.