by Outcast_Searcher » Mon 24 Mar 2014, 15:46:07
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'I')f we're going to fantasize about a city full of driverless cars, why not fantasize about a city full of driverless flying cars.
Much more fun.
Typical Planty. Representing the far right view, full of science denial and resistance to change.
The science and evidence for progress behind the technology for driverless cars is abundant. It is happening, whether you deny it or not. The only question is when.
This reminds me of the shrill denial of strong chess players as chess playing programs advanced rapidly from the early '80's for 15-ish years until Deep Blue defeated world champion Garry Kasparov in 1997 in a match.
(Much like Planty denial, Kasparov claimed IBM "cheated" and there is even a paranoid "documentary" movie about his delusions, but the reality is pretty obvious. Today, chess grandmasters don't dare play a dynamic position against a top class computer -- or they get tactically CRUSHED.)
Though we may still be a decade or two away from the fully autonomous version, the driverless cars are coming, and Google is testing them now. In several years, they went from getting lost on a small test track in the annual race to test their progress to averaging fairly high speeds and completing long complex courses. All you have to do is Google "driverless car" and you can find articles, Nova documentaries, etc. on this subject.
Denying this is occurring makes as much sense as denying evolution occurred, that the earth is warming in recent decades (for whatever the reason), or that the earth is 6000 years old since the Bible tells us so.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.