by Subjectivist » Fri 27 Dec 2013, 16:42:23
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'I') don't see how brine water can melt snow? All the salt ions available to dissolve in the still-frozen water are already taken up by the water you apply?
The brine water they make from rock salt is suppossed to be 32% sodium chloride by weight, the produced water that is sold south of here in Ohio is about 28% salt but it is a mixture of calcium, sodium, magnesium and potassium chlorides that stays liquid down to about -15F. For the stuff the county makes out of rock salt it is liquid down to 5F but as it melts snow and ice it absorbs the water and becomes less and less concentrated and the freezing temperature goes up. Sea water is a little under 3.8% salt and it freezes around 28F.
Straight rock salt spread on the roads clears ice and snow down to about 20F, below that regular salt gets diluted too fast to be effective. The theory behind the brine is they spray it the day before the snow and it dries on the paving as powder crystalline salt taking up all the pore spaces in the paving and preventing ice and snow from adhering. I am not sure I buy into the theory, but that is the logic the county road crews use to justify using brine spray.
http://www.ohio.com/blogs/drilling/ohio ... t-1.443914$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')uck Creek Energy, based in Brecksville, Ohio, created AquaSalina™ in 2003 and received approval for its use as a deicer and dust suppressant from the Ohio Department of Natural Resources in 2004. The liquid deicer and dust suppressant, AquaSalina™ is natural seawater that is a byproduct of oil and gas well production processed to clean water standards except for the salt content into a new commodity and is used by snow removal contractors and municipalities in Ohio. Applying AquaSalina™ to rock salt reduces salt used and chloride run off into our lakes and streams.
In early 2012, Duck Creek brought the defamation suit against Tish O’Dell and Michelle Aini, who are also members of a group that oppose oil and gas drilling, because they described AquaSalina™ as frac water and frac waste. The case was settled in September 2013 with the defendants agreeing to an injunction preventing them from further defaming Duck Creek Energy and also paying the company damages. The defendants are prohibited from referring to AquaSalina™ as fracwater, fracking waste, frack waste, fracking fluid, fracking by-product, toxic, carcinogenic, cancer causing, poisonous or radioactive or any synonym thereof.
“I felt it was crucial to stand up for the oil and gas industry and hold these individuals accountable for making defamatory statements about our product,” said David I. Mansbery, president of Duck Creek. “The defendant’s malicious statement that AquaSalina™ is “frac water” was completely untrue and in fact the product they defamed is environmentally-friendly and use of the product actually gives benefits to the environment rather than harming it by reducing the rock salt and chlorides applied to roadways by up to 40 percent. The very environment some individuals claim to protect is harmed by their misguided actions.”
My question starting this thread is, if this stuff is so useful to produce as a side line of oil and gas production why not skip all the headaches from the oil and gas and drill directly for the purpose of producing the saline water? Rockman argues it is too corrosive/expensive and he is the expert, but Duck Creek Energy delivers their Aquasalina to customers in my county for $0.409/gal and we are about 200 miles from the source.
ODOT makes their own rocksalt water brine for $0.04/gal but when its really cold they buy liquid calcium chloride brine and it runs $0.20 to $0.60/gal based on todays Toledo Blade newspaper.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he Bowling Green district, which covers Fulton, Lucas, Wood, Ottawa, Williams, Henry, Seneca, and Sandusky counties, spent just less than $2 million on snow and ice control last winter.
ODOT's local snow-and-ice tab was $3 million in 1999-2000 and $3.8 million in 2000-2001, but last winter was unusually mild. It was on course to post a historically low snowfall total in northwest Ohio before a late March storm brought more than nine inches to Toledo.
Drivers at the Fulton County garage near here predicted yesterday that Mother Nature will be meaner during the coming season.
“We're going to get a couple storms, at least,” said Jim Lucas of Wauseon. “We're due for one with a lot of wind.”
“It's got to catch up one of these years,” agreed Ray Sugg, also of Wauseon.
During this week's preseason equipment inspections, Dennis Boyle, the district equipment supervisor, is touring the maintenance garages and selecting trucks at random for checkups. Garage staff have been given a month to catch up on maintenance, he said, “and we're making sure everything's operational.”
Roads treated with salt brine are easy to spot: the sprayed solution leaves parallel white lines on the pavement. Even without any winter storms, ODOT crews have used it this season on certain bridges where overnight frost is known to cause ice problems, Mr. Rutherford said.
Salt brine costs about 4 cents a gallon, and ODOT mixes it itself “so we don't have to wait for a supply,” the spokesman said. The best-known liquid ice-fighting alternatives, calcium chloride and Ice Ban, a magnesium chloride product, cost 20 cents and 60 cents per gallon, respectively, he said.
Read more at
http://www.toledoblade.com/frontpage/20 ... s2BiVOD.99