Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Looking Back at Peak Oil

Discuss research and forecasts regarding hydrocarbon depletion.

Re: Looking Back at Peak Oil

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Tue 26 Nov 2013, 18:03:24

I don't want to discourage posting all the pretty and occasionally battling charts but stating simple (and unarguable) %'s is a pretty easy way to make the same point. Easier on old eyes like mine. For instance what was the percentage increase in US production? What % has the US shales increased global production. Etc. Etc.

No scales required. Pretty difficult to use scale games to obscure the facts since we all use the same base ten counting system...at least I hope we do.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Looking Back at Peak Oil

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Wed 27 Nov 2013, 00:53:47

Its a common misconception and often an intentional obfuscation to talk about the "Shale boom".

While the increases are locally important (in the US), the overall picture of oil production is seldom talked about. The ONLY CONTEXT is global production. Yes its great for our economy and it has positive effects on the industry HERE, but the reality is that those charts tell the ONLY STORY we should all be paying close attention to.

That story is GLOBAL PRODUCTION. Period. Oil is sold on a Global market and understanding this in light of ever increasing prices and a nearly stagnant GLOBAL production picture is the only thing we should be attempting to pin down. The FACT that tight oil in the US makes up for such a small amount of the daily global number is lost on just about everyone who cannot see it in the light of the global picture.

Its almost become a meme for goodness sake..No worries!!! Shale growth will save us! I agree with the previous poster who hit the nail on the head with the comment that Peak will be on the menu again very soon once the Shale Boom begins the inevitable cessation of the rocket shot in growth. Just a matter of time and we are going to be wondering how our economies both at home in the US and abroad can manage any sort of real growth with such high prices for crude.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: Looking Back at Peak Oil

Unread postby Pops » Wed 27 Nov 2013, 08:02:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('John_A', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', '&')quot;Blew it away!"

snort


Rather than debate why Tufte would have a field day with inappropriate scales on a 2 dimensional plot to hide the obvious, I will just defer to the way the lead energy information specialist in the United States says it. :)

Imagine that.....all the way back to the Drake well.....in a country 40 years into a supposedly TERMINAL post peak decline.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')IA Administrator Adam Sieminski explained in a conference call to reporters on Tuesday, “That is the largest single-year growth in U.S. production all the way back to the drake oil well in Titusville, Pennsylvania in 1859.”


http://www.eagleenergycore.com/oil-prod ... s-history/


You don't like the scale because it hides the obvious? OK, here is the same data with the aspect reversed, does it show the "obvious"?

Image

I think what is obvious in either plot is C+C production has been flat since 2005 and the contribution of US LTO (while it may be the largest increase in US history) has done little in the context of a global plateau in production. Touting a couple of percentage points increase in 8 years as a game changer in a world built on a couple percentage points increase per year seems more like obfuscation or misdirection from the overall picture than what aspect one chooses for a chart.

Now, add in the fact that it's taken close to half the drilling rigs in the world to achieve that little bump (1,300 of about 3k worldwide currently) and the even harder truth that LTO regions are only as productive as their newest wells (quick decline IOW) and the situation becomes even more obvious
.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Looking Back at Peak Oil

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Wed 27 Nov 2013, 11:03:35

AP - "Yes its great for our economy..." Actually I think one can make a valid argument for just the opposite. OTOH it does decrease our oil trade deficit if you only count bbls and not $'s. While importing fewer bbls but shipping many more $'s overseas than 10 years ago. And 10 years or so ago the US oil consumers were paying about $650 million per day for all the oil they bought. Now, thanks to the increased price of oil that created the "shale boom" they are spending about $1.7 trillion per day. Of course, you don't hear me complaining...is everyone else here enjoying the change as much as me? LOL.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Looking Back at Peak Oil

Unread postby John_A » Wed 27 Nov 2013, 13:05:55

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. And I notice that no one can refute the FACT as stated by someone with far more experience in this regard than anyone else on this board. Obviously his $100 million budget lends more than a little credibility to him knowing more than us amateurs, good scales, bad scales, or burning need to avoid why when "terminal decline" isn't, the preferred method of fighting back is to recycle all the same ideas which said such increases couldn't happen in the first place, let alone be spoken about by the experts in this way.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')IA Administrator Adam Sieminski explained in a conference call to reporters on Tuesday, “That is the largest single-year growth in U.S. production all the way back to the drake oil well in Titusville, Pennsylvania in 1859.”


http://www.eagleenergycore.com/oil-prod ... s-history/
45ACP: For when you want to send the very best.
John_A
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1193
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2011, 21:16:36

Re: Looking Back at Peak Oil

Unread postby Gordianus » Wed 27 Nov 2013, 13:42:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('John_A', 'E')veryone is entitled to their own opinion. And I notice that no one can refute the FACT as stated by someone with far more experience in this regard than anyone else on this board. Obviously his $100 million budget lends more than a little credibility to him knowing more than us amateurs, good scales, bad scales, or burning need to avoid why when "terminal decline" isn't, the preferred method of fighting back is to recycle all the same ideas which said such increases couldn't happen in the first place, let alone be spoken about by the experts in this way.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')IA Administrator Adam Sieminski explained in a conference call to reporters on Tuesday, “That is the largest single-year growth in U.S. production all the way back to the drake oil well in Titusville, Pennsylvania in 1859.”


http://www.eagleenergycore.com/oil-prod ... s-history/


I can accept that this is a fact, but I don't understand how it helps. It is extremely limited in scope: the increase in production year on year for 2013 was a record. So what?

Interestingly, if you read the article quickly and don't apply any critical thinking, it leaves you with the impression that 1. this annual increase is repeatable and 2. that USA is producing more oil than ever before.

But the article doesn't actually state either of these things. The USA is not producing more oil than ever before - it peaked in the 1970s. The annual increase may or may not be repeatable (that's a matter of conjecture) but the article doesn't take a view on it.

Finally, I think you are far too credulous of so-called experts. I am an expert in my field (which is unrelated to peak oil) and I know a lot of people who claim to be experts, who are really just bulls**tters. If you want to defend someone as an expert, you need a lot more collateral than the size of their budget.
Gordianus
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon 14 Oct 2013, 14:22:19
Top

Re: Looking Back at Peak Oil

Unread postby Pops » Wed 27 Nov 2013, 14:23:14

LOL, you won that one _A, mostly because no one is arguing the point as it is beside the point.

BTW, speaking of "going all the way back to Titusville", the annual average price of oil in real terms is also higher for longer than anytime - almost 3 years now. I guess ROCK mentioned that already, too bad he didn't use a pretty chart or I would have remembered.

:P
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Looking Back at Peak Oil

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Wed 27 Nov 2013, 23:25:14

A budget also does not mean you dont have an agenda. I always take folks opinions who are in positions of control/influence with a huge grain of salt. Honestly everyone here can be guilty of this at times, but my personal experience is that the cornies seem to be quite a bit more prone to cherry picking over the last few years.

Dont shoot the messenger I always say, but in the same breath, use some common sense in whose message you use and why.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: Looking Back at Peak Oil

Unread postby John_A » Thu 28 Nov 2013, 00:17:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Gordianus', '
')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')IA Administrator Adam Sieminski explained in a conference call to reporters on Tuesday, “That is the largest single-year growth in U.S. production all the way back to the drake oil well in Titusville, Pennsylvania in 1859.”


http://www.eagleenergycore.com/oil-prod ... s-history/


I can accept that this is a fact, but I don't understand how it helps. It is extremely limited in scope: the increase in production year on year for 2013 was a record. So what?[/quote]

It happened a century and a half after oil production started in a mature area, and 40 years after it peaked, and the reason why it matters is because peak oil theory says it shouldn't have happened. "Terminal decline" is in the definition I cited....you understand that it can't be terminal decline when it is increasing at a rate faster than at any time in prior history...right? And that if peak theorists can fit declining curves to everything because they FEEL like it, there is now an argument that they CAN'T.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Gordianus', '
')Interestingly, if you read the article quickly and don't apply any critical thinking, it leaves you with the impression that 1. this annual increase is repeatable and 2. that USA is producing more oil than ever before.


Is repeatable? But of COURSE it is...and it has ALREADY happened. Go look at what happened after global peak in oil production in 1979 or so. Tell me what happened afterwards...using that critical thinking cap and all.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Gordianus', '
')Finally, I think you are far too credulous of so-called experts.


You have a better source of information than that available to Adam Sieminski, his experience, his $100 million budget to investigate EXACTLY these kinds of questions, and the 350 folks rounding up all sorts of proprietary information from oil and gas companies, we would all like to hear about it.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Gordianus', '
') I am an expert in my field (which is unrelated to peak oil) and I know a lot of people who claim to be experts, who are really just bulls**tters. If you want to defend someone as an expert, you need a lot more collateral than the size of their budget.

Sure. Name all the other folks on the planet with Adam's budget, ability to ask of oil companies information they would never tell YOU, or ASPO, or Lahherrere, or Duncan, or Ruppert, or Heinberg, and 350 or so folks specializing in using that information, except they actually have degree's in the topics in question, actual experience, and are paid to study it day and night?

There are experts, and there are experts. Who can match Adam and his backup in the expert department? The IEA maybe? The folks at Shell and XOM who do this sort of work? Maybe a consortium in Europe? JOGMEC? Rystad? IHS?

The list is short. And he is on it.
45ACP: For when you want to send the very best.
John_A
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1193
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2011, 21:16:36
Top

Re: Looking Back at Peak Oil

Unread postby John_A » Thu 28 Nov 2013, 00:26:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', 'A') budget also does not mean you dont have an agenda.


May I recommend you read the charter of the organization prior to claiming agenda? The beauty of the EIA is how it is protected by law to do its job, shielded from the very people who knew they needed just that sort of independent statistics and analytics in the first place.

Very Supreme Courtish.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')By law, EIA's products are prepared independently of policy considerations. EIA neither formulates nor advocates any policy conclusions. The Department of Energy Organization Act allows EIA's processes and products to be independent from review by Executive Branch officials; specifically, Section 205(d) says:

"The Administrator shall not be required to obtain the approval of any other officer or employee of the Department in connection with the collection or analysis of any information; nor shall the Administrator be required, prior to publication, to obtain the approval of any other officer or employee of the United States with respect to the substance of any statistical or forecasting technical reports which he has prepared in accordance with law."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Inf ... nistration



$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', '
') I always take folks opinions who are in positions of control/influence with a huge grain of salt. Honestly everyone here can be guilty of this at times, but my personal experience is that the cornies seem to be quite a bit more prone to cherry picking over the last few years.


Fortunately the quote I utilized had nothing to do with opinion and was based on the information available to the head of the EIA. Reporting information which does not confirm a preconceived notion is neither cornie nor Doomer, it is just information.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', '
') Dont shoot the messenger I always say, but in the same breath, use some common sense in whose message you use and why.


Absolutely. Sure sounds like that is exactly what Adam was doing with that particular quote. Perhaps he is a closest Doomer and was as surprised by the information gathered for his analysis as everyone else? And then just reported it honestly, doing his job and energy information arbiter of the United States.
45ACP: For when you want to send the very best.
John_A
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1193
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2011, 21:16:36
Top

Previous

Return to Peak oil studies, reports & models

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron