by John_A » Mon 25 Nov 2013, 11:16:31
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MD', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('John_A', '
')Well, reserves have been replaced pretty well, globally speaking, over that same time period. Matter of fact, if we hadn't, we wouldn't have ANY left, having produced more than was reserves back then.

Yes of course they have! Did you know that fracking companies are willing to truck water into private residences that complain about gassy water?
Did you know that trucking water to a private residence until the facts of the matter are determined is oil field courtesy and nothing more? Oil and gas companies want to keep their landowners happy, which is why they pay them thousands of dollars per acre and a large chunk of gross revenues. So not only a good neighbor, but downright profitable for the landowners! Ever see them sign the lease allowing oil and gas production to happen and be UNHAPPY when the check is handed to them? Me neither.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MD', '
') On the face of it that seems extremely unlikely to be economic, but it is or they wouldn't do it.
I'm not making any value judgments as to whether it's right or wrong, I am just pointing out what
is.
For filling a single frack impoundment in Ohio and Pennsylvania the costs can run into the millions of dollars, 2/3's of that trucking. Dropping off some water for a landowner to keep up relations with the locals? So small as to be inconsequential unless you are trying to supply a city the size of Pittsburgh, and then obviously you wouldn't TRUCK anything, you would build a pipeline and ship it that way.
45ACP: For when you want to send the very best.
by John_A » Mon 25 Nov 2013, 11:25:36
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Subjectivist', 'I') must not be a youngster because I remember when gasoline went from $0.32/gal to $0.51/gal. I was too young to drive but it sure freaked my parents out.
You ain't a youngter. And are EXACTLY right. Just take the faces of those folks from so long ago, imagine them plastered on the cardboard cutouts of youngsters on PO forums, and presto. Freaked out translates straight to OH NOES!! THE END IS NIGH!!! Or at least it once did, until all the fast crashers realized nothing was fast crashing, and took their hysteria to greener pastures.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Subjectivist', '
') Back then you only had to be 14 to drive farm equipment down the right of way beside the paving on the highway, I thought it was great. You could drive at a speedy 12 mph down to the station and fill your 20 gallon tank for $10.00 and get change back. Today if I buy fuel I will pay more in taxes for one gallon than we paid for the gallon of fuel when I was a kid.
Yep. There really was once cheap gasoline. But no one has seen it since the late 60's or so, all the youngsters are always blathering on about only 21st century events. Just imagine what great great grand-dad must have felt like during the Oil Panic of 1916!!
Oklahoma oil prices (affected by the depletion of the Cushing field...DEPLETION!!! IN 1916!! Imagine that!) jumped from 40 cents a barrel to $2.05!!! Needless to say when this happened in the spring of 1916 there was the same sort of mass hysteria that now is so evident in web forums where folks just aren't aware of how many times scarcity and shortages and fear and panic happened before...and they should! Because if they DID, they might realize that what has happened in the 21st century is tiddly winks to THOSE scary days. Good god man, the US Bureau of Mines claimed that the US would peak within 5 years! By 1921!!
rinse and repeat....wait a generation...grow some new prophets....start it up all over again....
45ACP: For when you want to send the very best.
by Shaved Monkey » Tue 26 Nov 2013, 22:04:11
It may not be half but even if its a few its the flow on effect of PO
Mental health and physical health are linked to economic prosperity and the possibility of achieving our expectations.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')'HIV rates and heroin use have risen significantly, with about half of new HIV infections being self-inflicted to enable people to receive benefits of €700 per month and faster admission on to drug substitution programmes'.
Greece's prolonged economic crisis – the nation is now mired in a sixth straight year of recession – has sparked a public health crisis that has seen infectious diseases soar.
The HIV rate has nearly tripled over the past decade, according to the Hellenic Centre for Disease Control and Prevention .
Last week, in one of the most dramatic signs yet of the toll the debt drama is having, the National School of Public Health announced that the life expectancy of Greeks had dropped from 81 to 78 years since the outbreak of the crisis four years ago.
Suicides and homicides have also shot up as Greeks grapple with record rates of unemployment (at 27% the highest in the eurozone) and deepening poverty.
"In a climate that is very negative drug users in particular have become ever more self-destructive," said Babis Poulopoulos, Greece's leading authority on drug rehabilitation.
"To say that people are deliberately injecting themselves with HIV, however, is absurd.
It's not benefits which are their incentive, it's life.
They have lost the motivation to live," he told the Guardian.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/n ... -inflicted
Ready to turn Zombies into WWOOFers
-

Shaved Monkey
- Intermediate Crude

-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Wed 30 Mar 2011, 01:43:28
-
by Pops » Wed 27 Nov 2013, 07:20:02
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MD', 'T')he real energy crisis is a slow growth crisis.
The real Peak Oil happened 40 some-odd years ago when the US peaked and OPEC put restrictions on supply. Since then we have been substituting gas and returning to coal. Oil's percentage of total primary energy has fallen from near half to a third.

--To the slow growth part, the percentage of the gross product of the US that is paid in wages and salary has steadily declined since the '70s as well...

Correlation isn't causation and all that but there must be an argument in there somewhere. Economic growth can only occur with consumption and consumers need income. But more basically, growth is simply the accumulation of surplus, and virtually free energy is the ultimate surplus. Moving from dense and fungible oil to less versatile and more difficult to transport natural gas and even worse, back to coal (and inevitably back to biofuels & simple solar) will reduce the energy surplus and so reduce growth - eventually causing de-growth.
Anything else requires [insert miraculous energy source here]
.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
-

Pops
- Elite

-
- Posts: 19746
- Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
- Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
-
by John_A » Wed 27 Nov 2013, 12:34:50
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Gordianus', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('John_A', '
')rinse and repeat....wait a generation...grow some new prophets....start it up all over again....
OK, but you can't repeat the cycle indefinitely, because in each cycle the energy returned on energy invested diminishes.
Fortunately there is an entire thread around here on why EROEI really doesn't matter in this debate.
And you are right, you can't repeat the cycle indefinitely. One of the reasons we don't continue to use whale oil for illumination any more, and when the easy oil ran out at the beginning of the 20th century, we started using the harder stuff.
45ACP: For when you want to send the very best.
by John_A » Wed 27 Nov 2013, 12:44:14
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Strummer', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Gordianus', 'O')K, but you can't repeat the cycle indefinitely, because in each cycle the energy returned on energy invested diminishes. And when it goes below 1 (or the lower limit for economic recovery, which is a little higher than that) the whole system stops. At this point, oil doesn't just get incrementally more expensive, it becomes economically useless. Any reserves remaining will simply stay in the ground.
John_A does not believe in EROEI. He believes the economy can make up for it with higher volumes and efficiency.
Not quite. John certainly does not "believe" in EROEI (belief being related to zealotry, I prefer a perspective based in science), but I have said NOTHING about its relationship to efficiency. Increasing energy efficiency is easy to measure, you can probably find an example on hot water tanks in most American homes.
And I don't believe I've made any statements whatsoever related to "the economy", I do my best to stick to the building blocks of the system rather than generalizing at a higher level where non-building blocks can become involved and bias the expected outcome. Above ground factors, political changes, social unrest, better yet, behavioral changes and humans deciding to just do something differrent.
45ACP: For when you want to send the very best.
by John_A » Wed 27 Nov 2013, 12:53:05
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', 'R')eserve replacement? Yes indeed, Big Oil has done a bang up job. Except, of course, for Mobil Oil, Texaco, Arco, Getty Oil, Tenneco, Conoco, etc. etc. Not only did they not replace reserves but were cannibalized by the companies that acquired them. Consider the year that ExxonMobil acquired XTO. About 80% of the reserves that XOM "added" that year were due to that acquisition and not done with the drill bit. And then add the amount of reserves in the ground that were known for years but weren't counted because they weren't economic due to lower oil prices. Prices boom and those reserves are created by shifting them from the proved non-commercial column to the proved commercial column. Of course, if oil prices drop those reserves slide back to their previous position. But there is a silver lining to the 3X increase in oil prices: we are doing more exploration which does add some previously unidentified reserves.
Since about the time you started your career, "previously unidentified" can be measured in the 13 figures barrels of oil Rockman. Excellent collective job, and your understatement of your industries success is just so awe-shucks humble it does you proud.
45ACP: For when you want to send the very best.
-
John_A
- Heavy Crude

-
- Posts: 1193
- Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2011, 21:16:36
-
by Quinny » Thu 28 Nov 2013, 05:09:18
Whale oil

You are quite a joker are'nt you!
We didn't move from whale oil to a product that gave lower EROEI it was much higher.
The point has made several times that previous transitions have involved a move to more energy intensive products/systems. As Pop said we are already moving backwards down the hierarchy.
The question he posed is valid and some here believe we have LENR or fusion or something that will save us. What's your solution?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('John_A', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Gordianus', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('John_A', '
')rinse and repeat....wait a generation...grow some new prophets....start it up all over again....
OK, but you can't repeat the cycle indefinitely, because in each cycle the energy returned on energy invested diminishes.
Fortunately there is an entire thread around here on why EROEI really doesn't matter in this debate.
And you are right, you can't repeat the cycle indefinitely. One of the reasons we don't continue to use whale oil for illumination any more, and when the easy oil ran out at the beginning of the 20th century, we started using the harder stuff.
by John_A » Thu 28 Nov 2013, 12:49:08
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Quinny', 'W')hale oil

You are quite a joker are'nt you!
We didn't move from whale oil to a product that gave lower EROEI it was much higher.
EROEI had nothing to do with why whale oil peaked, we used less, found a substitute for it, and began using more of that.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Quinny', '
')The point has made several times that previous transitions have involved a move to more energy intensive products/systems. As Pop said we are already moving backwards down the hierarchy.
It isn't moving "backwards", it is the natural and simple progression we have been following since we ran low of easy oil sometime around 1901, then less easy ran out some more by 1927, and then again by 1947, and again in the 1960's, and so then again in the 1990's.....this progression has NEVER stopped since the first "easy" ran low.
This is what is SUPPOSED to happen, it isn't moving backwards in the least. Resource pyramid. Going deeper. Opening up more resources. Prices stabilize around marginal barrel of manufactured product. Been happening before Pops was born, will continue to function after he is gone.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Quinny', '
')The question he posed is valid and some here believe we have LENR or fusion or something that will save us. What's your solution?
Each and every part of the solutions already being built around us, with plenty of remaining fossil fuels to see them all lifted off the ground.
To date we've used perhaps 1/6 of the already prototyped and utilized stuff we can manufacture our gasoline and diesel from, so we've got the other 5/6's ready to support the ongoing transition.
That is JUST on the oil side. The natural gas side has far more potential, and itself is a chemical feedstock for liquid fuels.
People are already commuting to work not using liquid fuels to run their cars, growth in PV and wind is outstripping that coal fired electricity, humans can, and are, CHOOSING, to do something different. This is good. We should be happy, and move on to doing organic farming, or collecting MREs in a bunker, or just moving back to the country and prepping because we FEEL good about it, none of this requires magical thinking ala Harold Camping or peak oil to justify.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Quinny', '
')OK, but you can't repeat the cycle indefinitely, because in each cycle the energy returned on energy invested diminishes.
45ACP: For when you want to send the very best.
by John_A » Thu 28 Nov 2013, 13:04:36
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', '&')quot;'Excellent collective job, and your understatement of your industries success". Yes indeed...very successful. We've gotten the global economy to increase its oil bill from about $2.3 billion per day to about $7.5 billion per day in just the last ten years or so.
But that isn't your problem is it? You demand more for your product, the consumer can either pay it, or not. Their choice. Obviously the owner of your company doesn't care, otherwise he would offer up his BBLs for half price, sort of like a Black Friday sale, so that consumers might benefit from his generosity! Let me guess what he would say if you offered up that idea in a Monday morning planning meeting?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Rockman', '
')A tad shy of $2 TRILLION more per year. Damn successful. Oh...wait...did you mean successful for the oil patch or the consumers? Sorry...sometimes I forget about those "little people". LOL.
EXACTLY!! The oil business has never cared about the little people before, and you and your boss certainly aren't about to start now. What the market will bear...and guess what? The market obviously can bear MORE. So pour it on big guy! If your company can get $200/bbl for its product, DO IT!! You and your boss deserve it, being fine, upstanding oilmen, versus all those other kind.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', '
') Reminds me of the story about the world's most successful suicide expert...he was damn good at it but did a poor job at repeatability. Sorta like Mobil Oil, Texaco, Gulf Oil, etc. etc. etc. LOL.
Don't need Mobil, Texaco, Gulf, if they aren't the ones who added that 1 trillion+ barrels to inventory since about 1980. If they can't do what obviously others are doing, and with great success, then they SHOULD be toast.
45ACP: For when you want to send the very best.
by MD » Fri 29 Nov 2013, 13:05:08
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('John_A', 'S')ee previous comment on why EROEI isn't relevant. At least not until someone turn off the local nuclear furnace anyway.
Irrelevant when discussing long term stored energy.
Explain how solar energy can replace stored hydrocarbon energy at efficiencies required to sustain current economic systems, given current technology.
None exist.
EROEI remains the most crucial economic relationship as we move forward, and your nearly hysterical and repeated attempts to dismiss it prove without a doubt that you are either paid to squelch any efforts in that direction or you are a total imbecile.
I see no reason to believe the latter over the former.
Stop filling dumpsters, as much as you possibly can, and everything will get better.
Just think it through.
It's not hard to do.
-

MD
- COB

-
- Posts: 4953
- Joined: Mon 02 May 2005, 03:00:00
- Location: On the ball
-