Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

So when will renewables become cheaper than fossil fuels?

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: So when will renewables become cheaper than fossil fuels

Unread postby Newbie Wants Info » Mon 03 Jun 2013, 15:30:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newbie Wants Info', 'I')t's not just concentrated solar, it combines wind, biomass, hydro, etc in a network spread across northern Africa, the middle east and Europe, taking advantage of a massive amount of renewable energy sources. The only thing standing in the way of affordable, environmentally friendly energy network are the "peoples" in the region who fight like dumb animals over religion and territory.
Okay. So let me rephrase:

Concentrating solar power, wind, biomass, hydro, etc. are not new technologies. What about DESERTEC is new, other than the obviously high production values of its presentation?


Combining them in a massive network spanning two continents to share energy via HVDC is what is "new." I'm not really sure why you're persisting about this. The thread was not about what is "new" but when renewables will become cheaper than fossil fuels. That's going to happen very soon thanks to the free-market capitalist robber barons at DESERTEC and other like minded ventures.
Newbie Wants Info
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun 02 Jun 2013, 19:21:01

Re: So when will renewables become cheaper than fossil fuels

Unread postby Newbie Wants Info » Mon 03 Jun 2013, 15:54:15

I won't tell you thrice. Greedy capitalist robber barons are well on their way to solving the fossil fuel problem in Europe and Asia. If that makes you mad you can put on your Che Guevara t-shirt and sulk behind the refuge of the "Redwood Curtain" or you can put on your happy face and roll with it.
Newbie Wants Info
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun 02 Jun 2013, 19:21:01

Re: So when will renewables become cheaper than fossil fuels

Unread postby kublikhan » Mon 03 Jun 2013, 16:29:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('C8', 'U')S really is doomed to become a second or third world nation in 40 years as other countries invest in the transition and we are stuck with ever more expensive fossil fuels.
Couldn't agree more. The process has started. Other countries will continue to invest in the transition as our programs languish. Only the USA ever had the luxury to turn away from public transport, and build out its suburban sprawl. It will be our undoing.
The us may be lagging on public transportation and suburban sprawl, but it is leading on other indicators. It is #1 in producing energy from renewable energy sources. And #2 in new investments in new renewable energy(behind China). And if Planty is correct that Chinese solar panels are crap, we may want to take China's #1 position with a grain of salt.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hich nations have the best record for using renewable energy?

1. The United States: 24.7 percent of the world total
The U.S. use of alternative energy sources is increasing due to federal, state, and local tax and other incentives, as well as mandated state goals. This is in spite of the fact that attempts to join international agreements or introduce long-term, large scale reductions in emissions have met with opposition in Congress and in the private sector.

2. Germany: 11.7 percent of the world total
Germany made a historic decision when the country decided to phase out nuclear power in favor of alternative sources by 2022. Ironically, it is the only country in the G-20 economic bloc to project a decline in clean energy investment, partially because it has already done so much as an early leader in renewable energy.

3. Spain, 7.8 percent of world total
Last April, wind power became Spain’s largest source of electricity generation, although the country still imports the majority of its energy. Spanish producers are also building turbines and installing wind farms internationally, including in the U.S. Sadly, with the current economic problems in Spain, this may change.

4. China: 7.6 percent of world total
China is erecting 36 wind turbines a day and building a robust new electricity grid to send this power thousands of miles across the country from the deserts of the west to the cities of the east. It is part of a long-term plan to supply 15% of the country’s energy from alternative and renewable sources by 2020.

5. Brazil: 5 percent of world total
Brazil has boosted large investments into the wind sector through government auctions for contracts, and is also working to attract foreign investment into solar energy. The country has also made a pledge to have solar power in all twelve venues when it hosts the 2014 World Cup.
5 Top Countries Leading The World In Renewable Energy

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'â')€¢ The U.S. wind industry installed 8,380 megawatts (MW) during the fourth quarter of 2012 bringing the total U.S. wind power capacity installations to 60,007 MW and 2012 installations to 13,124 MW.
• The U.S. wind industry more than doubled its previous high quarter for installations, going from 4,113 MW during the fourth quarter of 2009 to 8,384 MW during the fourth quarter of 2012
• Wind energy became the number one source of new U.S. electricity generating capacity for the first time, providing some 42% of all new generating capacity. In fact, 2012 was a strong year for all renewables, as together they accounted for over 55 % of all new U.S. generating capacity.

How did the industry get to 60 GW?
• It took more than 25 years to reach 10 GW (in 2006), then only 2 more years to reach 20 GW (in 2008).
• The U.S. wind industry hit 40 GW in 2010 and then in 2012 hit both the 50 GW and 60 GW milestone
AWEA U.S. Wind Industry Fourth Quarter 2012 Market Report

Further, we are going to continue to need fossil fuels during our transition to renewables. And the US is rich in fossil fuels. As reported recently in the coal thread, the US has 245 years of coal. China has 21-38 years. In terms of providing for the energy needs of it's residents, I think many countries will top the "doomed" charts long before the US.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he idea of peak oil—the point at which global production reaches its maximum—has fixated the energy industry for years. Now, China is grappling with a new worry: peak coal. Experts are starting to predict when China's coal reserves will run out—a nightmare scenario in a country where 70% of its energy is derived from coal.

According to BP, China can only continue at current rates of production for 38 years before its coal reserves are exhausted. That compares with 245 years in the U.S., and 105 years in India.

Even if China's annual coal demand growth halved to 5% then the country would run out of coal in 21 years unless it finds material new deposits, CLSA says. The picture isn't much brighter when calculations use IEA estimates of China's proven reserves. Annual consumption growth of 5% would see China run out of coal in 28 years, it forecasts.
The Coal Thread
The oil barrel is half-full.
User avatar
kublikhan
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 5064
Joined: Tue 06 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Illinois
Top

Re: So when will renewables become cheaper than fossil fuels

Unread postby Newbie Wants Info » Mon 03 Jun 2013, 16:48:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'N')ot really good news, Kub.


Not good news if you want America to fail.
Last edited by Newbie Wants Info on Mon 03 Jun 2013, 17:01:07, edited 1 time in total.
Newbie Wants Info
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun 02 Jun 2013, 19:21:01
Top

Re: So when will renewables become cheaper than fossil fuels

Unread postby Newbie Wants Info » Mon 03 Jun 2013, 17:06:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newbie Wants Info', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'N')ot really good news, Kub. quote]

Not good news if you want America to fail.
No, Newbie I don't want America to fail, I just want all of us, humanity to do the right thing. That means getting off the oily teat right away.


What about the radioactive waste, though? There's tonnes of it laying around all over the world. You can't expect all of it to be stored safely, especially not in turd world counties like India and China. What happens when some post-teat humans and animals start putting that stuff in their mouths, wearing it on necklaces made out of deer skin or braided plant fiber. What happens when they start dumping their chemicals and soaps in to the rivers and creeks, and when everyone starts playing with fire to keep themselves warm and well fed? There's going to be a serious ecological catastrophe far worse than global warming, which may prove to be far less dangerous than we thought it would be, or perhaps even nonexistent. Collapse is a dead end, my friend. The system must go on for at least 100 years. We must burn more coal, more oil, more natural gas. Burn it, burn it, burn it. Just burn it for fun, there's plenty of it.
Newbie Wants Info
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun 02 Jun 2013, 19:21:01
Top

Re: So when will renewables become cheaper than fossil fuels

Unread postby cephalotus » Thu 06 Jun 2013, 09:58:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('C8', 'I') have read in numerous places that the costs of manufacturing renewables keeps going down- especially solar. Many times I have read that, if this trend continues, solar will be cost equal to fossil fuels in 5 years.

Is this true?


It already happend.

Typical electricity rate for residental users in Germany is 27 €ct/kWh, electricity from small photovoltaic power plants cost around 13-15 €ct/kwh in Germany

Feed in tarif for large PV power plants in Germany is now 10,6 €ct/kWh (falling fast) for 20 years.
UK plans a feed in tarif system for new nuclear power plants with rates of 11,5 €ct/kWh for 40(!) years...

I Saudi Arabia electricity from PV is cheaper than oil for oil power plants (using the export price for oil).

So in many situations photovoltaic is already the cheaper option. If you have to store or transport the electricity the situation is more complex and it depends on the amount of storage and transportation that is needed for PV or the alternative technology.
cephalotus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 581
Joined: Tue 18 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Germany
Top

Re: So when will renewables become cheaper than fossil fuels

Unread postby cephalotus » Thu 06 Jun 2013, 10:01:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '
')So if solar, biomass, HVDC, etc. have heretofore been unable to undersell fossil fuels, what specifically does DESERTEC bring to the table that will turn around the cost/benefit situation? I guess its those greedy robber barons? They must have the giz in they pants. Or what?


Computers are not new and telephones are not new.

What makes you believe that a combination of a telephone and a computer will work now, but not 50 years ago?
cephalotus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 581
Joined: Tue 18 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Germany
Top

Re: So when will renewables become cheaper than fossil fuels

Unread postby evilgenius » Thu 06 Jun 2013, 12:16:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'D')id folks see the new data on Chinese solar cells?

China drove the price down on solar cells to the point that manufacturers in the USA were driven out of business. Now it turns out the Chinese solar cells are crap. Just like Chinese paneling, milk, and other products, the Chinese photovoltaics are made with shoddy materials and are failing long before the 25 years promised at purchase. As many as 5-20% of Chinese solar cells are failing within a couple of years of being installed. The solar biz is too new to know how many will last 5 years, or 10 years, much less the 25 years promised and on which the purported "energy savings" are based.

If folks have to rip out their cheap Chinese solar cells and replace them after only a few years, then the economics of installing and generating solar energy cells at the household level start to really stink.

Image
Cheap Chinese solar cells installed by many US homeowners over the last few years are starting to fail---tests show failure rates of up to 20% in just the first few years.


You're describing the same phenomenon that has changed immigration in the US. Almost everyone who has a 'gardener' doesn't really have a gardener anymore. They have an immigrant who is willing to do the easily trained steps for less. Quality is for sh*t, but that hasn't stopped the trend.

Recently the EU imposed taxes on Chinese solar, but it wasn't over quality. It was over prices so low that they figured it came from a nefarious source: dumping. The country that pretty much taught the world about dumping, er, sales of marginally produced surplus product at brand status ensuring low rates, the UK, it would seem is now on the opposite side of the argument. Don't countries only every argue for that which benefits them over that which makes good precedent? Continually low prices might actually make replacement of faulty product much more feasible, albeit with more of the same from dubious origin, but hasn't that ever been the case? Proper markets reveal the differences and let consumers make choices. It's up to us to pick based on price or on perceived quality.

I'm not arguing, btw, that alt energy can't do without government help. The help given to many industries via basic research has been invaluable to mankind. That sort of help has literally been society investing in itself, not knowing whether the investment would pay off or not. The least we could do to help ourselves given this situation might be to stop the right-wing war on science, wherein everything that doesn't have a definitive payoff that the creationists can't masturbate into is somehow considered 'foreign' or 'liberal' or 'ignorant', while the obese politicians who encourage such thinking line up at the trough.
User avatar
evilgenius
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3730
Joined: Tue 06 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Stopped at the Border.
Top

Re: So when will renewables become cheaper than fossil fuels

Unread postby cephalotus » Fri 07 Jun 2013, 04:46:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'D')id folks see the new data on Chinese solar cells?
...Now it turns out the Chinese solar cells are crap...


Most of them work quite well over here. There are exceptions, but this has little to do with China vs. others. For example we had many modules from First solar that was produced in durin the first year in the Malysia factory, that failed.

Nobody will force you to buy Chinese modules, if you do not like them. There are still Japanese, European and US(?) manufacturers around that have 20 years+ of experience with making solar modules...
cephalotus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 581
Joined: Tue 18 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Germany
Top

Re: So when will renewables become cheaper than fossil fuels

Unread postby Graeme » Tue 05 Nov 2013, 19:44:21

5 Reasons Solar Is Already Beating Fossil Fuels

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t's frustrating to still hear dissenters say that renewable energy is not ready to compete with fossil fuels as a means to power our country. The solar industry is growing dramatically every year, while fossil fuels continue to be phased out. Solar is no longer the cottage industry it was decades ago. Stunning advancements in production and financing have brought solar to the playing field with coal, oil, natural gas, and nuclear. And here are five reasons why solar is already winning.

1. Jobs

2. Price

3. Capacity

4. Investment

5. Environmental Impact


huffingtonpost
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand
Top

Re: So when will renewables become cheaper than fossil fuels

Unread postby Shaved Monkey » Tue 05 Nov 2013, 21:03:30

The major obstacle is the capitalist system is based on giving you a device that forces you to buy their razor blades.
Its hard to sell sun and wind
Ready to turn Zombies into WWOOFers
User avatar
Shaved Monkey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2578
Joined: Wed 30 Mar 2011, 01:43:28

Re: So when will renewables become cheaper than fossil fuels

Unread postby dashster » Thu 07 Nov 2013, 09:21:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('C8', 'I') have read in numerous places that the costs of manufacturing renewables keeps going down- especially solar. Many times I have read that, if this trend continues, solar will be cost equal to fossil fuels in 5 years.

Is this true? Isn't it easier to get bigger cost cuts in the beginning and then it gets harder to cut costs later? The first problems to be solved are the easier ones and represent the low hanging fruit.


Gail Tverberg had an article recently in which she pointed out something that normally goes unmentioned: renewable costs are always quoted in terms of their - variable - output costs. The cost of making intermittent solar and intermittent wind is compared to the cost of constant output coal/natural gas. If you factor in the cost of storing intermittent power generation from wind and solar so it can be later released when the sun isn't shining or the wind isn't blowing, the cost of renewables goes way up. So while the cost of producing a watt of electricity from wind and solar is marching closer and closer to fossil fuels, they are a long way from replacing fossil fuels since the cost of making them non-intermittent, is huge.

But given that we have global warming and given that fossil fuels create massive pollution and that fossil fuels are finite and depletable - cost shouldn't even be a factor. We should be going full out on renewables regardless of all the braying and bluster that will come from the talking heads on FoxNews and CNBC about it not being cost-effective. Let's take the trillions we spend on the military and our spy agencies and use that to fund renewable energy projects. But we will need to first make campaign contributions and lobbying illegal because there is too much money going into the pockets of politicians from the Military Industrial Group to wipe it out without that. And of course, there is so much romanticism of our military and it's world terrorist activities, which are normally described as "defending freedom", that we have other issues to overcome before getting that money transfer.
dashster
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 385
Joined: Fri 28 Dec 2012, 08:39:24
Location: California
Top

Re: So when will renewables become cheaper than fossil fuels

Unread postby Ulenspiegel » Thu 07 Nov 2013, 10:55:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dashster', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('C8', 'I') have read in numerous places that the costs of manufacturing renewables keeps going down- especially solar. Many times I have read that, if this trend continues, solar will be cost equal to fossil fuels in 5 years.

Is this true? Isn't it easier to get bigger cost cuts in the beginning and then it gets harder to cut costs later? The first problems to be solved are the easier ones and represent the low hanging fruit.


Gail Tverberg had an article recently in which she pointed out something that normally goes unmentioned: renewable costs are always quoted in terms of their - variable - output costs. The cost of making intermittent solar and intermittent wind is compared to the cost of constant output coal/natural gas. If you factor in the cost of storing intermittent power generation from wind and solar so it can be later released when the sun isn't shining or the wind isn't blowing, the cost of renewables goes way up. So while the cost of producing a watt of electricity from wind and solar is marching closer and closer to fossil fuels, they are a long way from replacing fossil fuels since the cost of making them non-intermittent, is huge.



One should check first some assumptions that were made in the article cited by G. Tverberg: The low EROEI for wind was calculated with turbines that are not longer in production (Enercon E-66, 2300 FLH in Schleswig Holstein, the prime location for windpower in Germany) and do not represent the starting point for a useful extrapolation. In addition, recycling of turbines was of course forgotten. Hint: Wind turbines contain a much higher percentage of metals than conventional power plants and recycling is SOP. :-)

With availabel data for modern turbines (E-92, E-115 with up-to 3900 FLH in Schleswig Holstein) the whole argument for on-shore wind, which is the most imortant contribution to the RE capacity, collapses of course: The EROEI of these turbines is in the range of 35 to 50, with recyling >60. BTW the important net difference betwenn EROEIs of 60 and 100, the authors give for a NPP, is very small and the latter value depends strongly on the uranium content of the used ore. :-)

The storage argument is to a certain extend a strawman. You can according to the German Association for Electrical, Electronic and Information Technologies (VDE), which is quite conservative association and not very green, add 40% reneables without any storage in the German context, i.e. a country without much pump storage capacity. Thefore a simple question: Why should I use the low EROEI for the RE capacity up to 40%?

The paper is not wrong, but lacks due to the low quality of some assumptions relevance and does not really support G.T.'s argument.
Ulenspiegel
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 260
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2013, 03:15:29
Top

Re: So when will renewables become cheaper than fossil fuels

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Thu 07 Nov 2013, 12:10:43

U –What I always find interesting is the discussions that revolve around hypothetical or guesstimate economics of the various alts. Not a wasted effort but in the end what matters is what’s actually being done. Granted one should be aware of the full cycle costs especially when govt funds are used to improve the economics but aren’t accounted for in the viability analysis.

So take wind power in Texas. Our capacity is as much as the #2 and #3 states combined. And while our state govt has enacted policies that supported this development for the most part it’s been entirely funded by private investments. And offshore wind appears to be on the verge of taking off soon. Despite the talk of offshore New England wind the fed govt is still fighting with the states to begin development. In the meantime years ago Texas awarded the first offshore wind licenses and the first offshore wind pilot project in the country was constructed.

Bottom line: be it Germany or Texas if some alt system makes economic sense it will be built. And that’s where the truth is to be found. As they say: facts beat theory every day.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron