Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Luddites vs Technologists

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Timo » Tue 22 Oct 2013, 16:49:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('John_A', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Timo', 'L')eaving the planet is the only option for continued economic growth because we've effectively exhausted all of our earthly physical resources.


Your being able to type that statement and have it stored in digital format for others to read around the world effectively disproves that statement right out of the box.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Timo', '
') Growth requires the exploitation of cheap resources, and we're now at the end of that heyday in our human history.


Reference to "growth requires the exploitation of cheap resources" in any economic textbook used anywhere in the United States please. While there are many interesting ways economics are interpreted by the lay folks, I seriously doubt the economists themselves said this. Ever.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Timo', '
')I'm not advocating the abandonment of space research completely, but trying to mine asteroids is a relatively low priority against saving the planet we live on. Placing economics ahead of planetary survival reflects the intelligence of a 2-year old.


Define "planetary survival". It is currently not possible for humans to actually destroy the earth within any context not containing the hubris so often found in the way such words are used.

"to ruin, spoil, render useless"

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/destroy

We might, MIGHT mind you, ruin, spoil or render useless the planet for HUMANS, but that is but a myopic view of all the species on the planet, some of which might be quite a bit happier with what we leave them. The planet is going to change in one way or another, regardless of the presence of humans, so this game of winners and losers through the geologic ages is not only not unexpected, but has happened many times before. Only the perspective of human hubris allows people to think we are all so important in the greater scheme of things.

And mining asteroids might be a low priority to you, but it is already happening, just on bigger bodies than asteroids. Which makes perfect sense, why do that when the big objects are so much easier to explore for this type of mineral potential which KJ has pointed out?

And like many things so often ignored, we are already DOING it. Have been for years. Ladies and Gentlemen, once it was a human and a donkey, now we are much more clever and our mineral explorers are there to help us continue growth beyond just our small little planet.

Image

Read the last sentence from my post that you quote.

'Nuff said.
Timo
 

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Tue 22 Oct 2013, 16:54:51

Orlov is exactly correct on the dynamics if off a bit on his timing. Mundane economic failure and subsequent systems failure will be the undoing of the high falutin' aspects of human endeavor. Boring. Let's keep talking about fantasy.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Tue 22 Oct 2013, 16:58:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'i')t was composed of almost pure iridium.
The are saying the asteroid was 10 km in diameter and contained the normal (minuscule) percentage of iridium found in chondrites. This accounts for the total amount of iridium in the K–Pg layer.

I don't know where you get the idea of a much smaller asteroid of pure iridium.
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby vision-master » Tue 22 Oct 2013, 16:59:25

vision-master
 

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Subjectivist » Tue 22 Oct 2013, 17:17:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', '[')url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDKMyv7oAiA]Asteroid TV135 heading towards Earth in 2032 could mean the end for humans[/url]


Nah, humans are not like Dinosaurs, we occupy just about every speck of land on the planet and if you sterilized 90% of the surface enough people would be left spread back over everything within a housand years or so.
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Subjectivist
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4705
Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 07:38:26
Location: Northwest Ohio
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Ibon » Tue 22 Oct 2013, 22:17:19

To know of the problem and still choose to distract yourself with fantasies is an adaptive coping mechanism.

And SG said it, BORING......
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby ralfy » Wed 23 Oct 2013, 05:57:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'W')e are quibbling over details again. Let me summarize my views again:

The nature of mankind during the "Long Emergency" to come will not change to any appreciable extent. We will still be separated into insular tribes divided from one another by national borders and barriers of language, culture, and ethnicity. The human race has not measurably changed in that period we call "recorded history", and we have less than that amount of time before oil, gas, and coal are depleted.

We will not magically become wiser or more environmentally conscious, we will still be squabbling over petty differences when the die-off begins. We will instead still be in acquisition mode for automobiles, central heating, mobile electronics, and other consumer goods. As these things become less affordable and food becomes more dear, we will complain and change politicians at every election if in a Democracy. In less fortunate places, gang warfare resumes and spreads, without benefit of a United Nations or a large and powerful nation like the USA to intervene.

In the USA and every other developed nation, we will finally be realizing how serious the situation is. The knowledge that each Forum member here at "Peak Oil" has today will finally be generally accepted by all. It will of course be too late to effect worldwide change. It was already too late in 1900 AD, and now there are something between 8 and 10 billion humans on the globe.

Then the hard times begin. Within a hundred years cannibalism is widespread. The slow decline of cultural norms and the agonizing forms that resource depletion imposes upon formerly comfortable lifestyles are recorded in bit-perfect digital storage.

The lucky ones with the opportunity to move into a clean and safe off-world colony do so. By then there will be precious little opportunity for such, because the original space pioneers will have their own culture, and their own population problems. But they will need laborers to build more space colonies. The new immigrants will be second class citizens.

You see? Things are not so different, after all.


The first four (starting with "The nature") and last paragraphs derail the fifth paragraph.
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Newfie » Wed 23 Oct 2013, 14:06:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', 'T')o know of the problem and still choose to distract yourself with fantasies is an adaptive coping mechanism.

And SG said it, BORING......


+1
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby John_A » Wed 23 Oct 2013, 17:24:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Timo', ' ')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')lacing economics ahead of planetary survival reflects the intelligence of a 2-year old.


Read the last sentence from my post that you quote.

'Nuff said.


No one advocated placing economics ahead of planetary survival.
45ACP: For when you want to send the very best.
John_A
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1193
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2011, 21:16:36
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Wed 23 Oct 2013, 17:53:14

I think you have missed the gist of KJ's points John.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby AgentR11 » Wed 23 Oct 2013, 18:37:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', 'T')here is a lot of overlap between the various modes of thought prevalent on Peak Oil dot Com.


I guess this makes me an Eco-Doomer Luddite who works to do my tiny part in advancing us towards technological singularity bliss.

On the space thing, I just don't see us ever mining something in space and then bringing it down to the surface of the Earth. Whatever you mine, the most valuable part of the result is the fact that its IN SPACE ALREADY. About as sane as manufacturing a scuba tank at the bottom of the Marianas Trench, and then shipping it to Los Angeles to sell in a dive shop 30 miles from a tank manufacturer down the highway.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby careinke » Wed 23 Oct 2013, 18:54:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', '
')
On the space thing, I just don't see us ever mining something in space and then bringing it down to the surface of the Earth. Whatever you mine, the most valuable part of the result is the fact that its IN SPACE ALREADY. About as sane as manufacturing a scuba tank at the bottom of the Marianas Trench, and then shipping it to Los Angeles to sell in a dive shop 30 miles from a tank manufacturer down the highway.


Except it is all down hill from space. 8)
Cliff (Start a rEVOLution, grow a garden)
User avatar
careinke
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 5047
Joined: Mon 01 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Pacific Northwest
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Threepwood » Wed 23 Oct 2013, 19:05:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')bundant resources = explosive growth( population explosion). Limited resources = limited life(population quasi-stable).


? the wealth effect creates the opposite result,

The largest multiplier of any 'environmental concern' you may have is population growth.
A sure fire way to promote this is to come up with a way to make energy more expensive,
wind, solar, gerbils are fun hobbies/ experiments for those who want to spend their own money,
spending others' is where the problems start
Threepwood
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed 23 Oct 2013, 12:26:04
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Wed 23 Oct 2013, 22:34:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'S')till scratching my head. We were talking about the plentiful evidence that more or less homogeneous metallic objects have struck the Earth, there is plenty.
I'm still scratching my head.

The composition of meteorites has been studied extensively and the amount of precious metals is in the one part per million range. I've done a bit of Googling and can't find any reference to your gold or iridium asteroids.
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby sparky » Thu 24 Oct 2013, 03:10:44

.
The Iridium in a meteorite is due to the observation of a thin band of deposit between two type of deposits
before the layer there is dinosaurs , after , there is none
a type of meteorite has a lot of Iridium in it ,more than the Earth crust
the thin deposit has been found all over the surface of the world,
the date is 66 millions years ago and three quarter of plants and animals died
an impact crater has been found in Mexico's Yucatan peninsula
It's a pretty good fit
User avatar
sparky
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3587
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Sydney , OZ

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Thu 24 Oct 2013, 04:28:47

This is a useless debate. I don't actually care whether it was pure iridium or iridium in stone. All of the heavy elements on the Earth's crust came from meteorites that struck after the core cooled and the crust formed.

All those elements are present in space. Metals, gases, water, hydrocarbons, and unlimited solar power.

We have all the knowledge, all the technology we need to explore space. We are in the development stage.

For an example of a space transportation system that requires nothing but electricity, I refer you to the Heinlein novel "The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress". Electromagnet catapults are used to send capsules of food from the Lunar colony farms to Earth.

Those of you who still have doubts: I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt. I think most of you have closed minds on this matter, and are pre-judging without even honestly examining the possibilities.

Our Solar System has all the raw materials, all the energy, and all the space that humans need to live. We know everything we need to know to build in space. In the end, the only thing stopping us is the opposition of closed minded people.

YOU get to decide whether your mind is closed or not. Let me point out that if you failed to examine the book I pointed you at, it is likely that you already decided long ago.

The thing is that perma-culture, agrarian farming methods, environmental consciousness, worshiping a living planet, etc. etc. is no form of an answer either. If we had thought the issues through and if the people of the entire Earth had understood what was at stake and what the path to human salvation was, then we could have saved this planet as late as 200 years ago.

I go to work every day, I log on and I do my best to keep our entire world working. I care for the computers that enable Internet commerce, credit cards, stock exchanges, and all forms of virtual electronic money. That is just my personal role, there are millions of people like me, striving constantly to keep the world in business. Collectively we make it possible for 7.3B humans to live and eat and reproduce. In the last 200 years, we have all of us working together been enormously successful.

The wife and I were remarking on the air pollution here in Silicon Valley this morning. It subsequently proved to be that there was a large grass fire South of the valley and the smoke was blowing North. Then a caller on the radio mentioned that if Climate Change were not occurring, this would not be happening - it is not often that fire season here persists into late October, but there has been only trace amounts of rain so far this year.

Then of course, that person blamed "Big Oil". Naturally. He was in his car, burning fuel and spewing partially burned hydrocarbons into the air, and it was someone else's fault. He was also breaking the law and endangering those around him by talking on what was almost certainly a "hands free" cell phone - still illegal, but very unlikely that you will be caught, especially if you keep the little earpiece in your right ear where nobody can see it. But he gave only a first name and he got away with it.

For just a moment, let me speak on behalf of those of us who are still working to keep things going.

Stop telling us we cannot possibly succeed. If you have a better plan, one that allows all the various peoples of the Earth to prosper, then let us hear it.

DON'T give me this crap about organic vegetables and the benefits of manure. Your farming methods if adopted today could feed a quarter of the people already in the US, but only if we ended food exports that keep others alive. Don't give me twaddle about Solar Power, when I frequently work until after dark, then have to grocery shop, cook, and do laundry after dark.

If you have actual beneficial ideas that would help the rest of us, then let's hear them. If you just want to tell other people that what they are proposing can never work, then why don't you go and take a long walk off a short pier, with pockets full of rocks.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Thu 24 Oct 2013, 05:52:19

Dear Sir, you are an arrogant pompous git.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby AgentR11 » Thu 24 Oct 2013, 08:28:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'W')e have all the knowledge, all the technology we need to explore space. We are in the development stage.


Its not knowledge we lack. Its magic. There is no lift or deorbit magic that applies sufficient delta-V without very high expenditure of resources. You know what made the space shuttle so expensive? The spec that required the ability to bring something significant down from LEO. Not even a lagrange pt, or moon, mars, or asteroid; but LEO.. and it broke the bank.

I know its frustrating, because we really do *know* how to go out to an asteroid, link up with it, do stuff there, and even bring something back. The cost is millions of dollars per kilo of returned material. And its only made worse by the fact that when you return and deorbit whatever it is you mined and refined... you are throwing away the most valuable characteristic of whatever it was you refined. Last thing you want to do is bring it down.

The reality is that we don't need the stuff of asteroids to make humans prosper; we need grain grown in a stable climate by industrial methods, delivered to market over well maintained rail, road, and freighter. Grain does not grown on asteroids. Nothing grain needs is on an asteroid.

And I'm writing this as someone right on the edge of a diabetes diagnosis; the stuff is just plain bad for me; but it is *still* essential to human life, if that human life is to remain numbered in the billions.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Thu 24 Oct 2013, 09:11:06

AgentR11, the same technique of electromagnetic catapult can be used to put payloads into orbit from the surface of the Earth. Such a system has a high capital investment (30 km of accelerator rings and a large power plant) but very low operating costs.

We are not talking about a tower 30 km high, either. A horizontal accelerator that terminates on a mountain top would work - as long as you gave the payload enough extra velocity to punch through the air and as long as it departs the catapult in a trajectory into the sky.

Payload re-entry is simple and cheap. Foamed glass re-entry shields and parachutes.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby vision-master » Thu 24 Oct 2013, 09:40:19

KaiserJeep, why do you talk about this space stuff. Here's my question, why are we still using 1950's prolusion systems?

You talk about going to the stars, yet us plebs on planet earth are still getting around in a Model A?
vision-master
 

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron