Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Luddites vs Technologists

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sun 20 Oct 2013, 18:50:01

Thermodynamically appropriate... interesting terminology.

Funny of the dozens of multi decade established 'intentional communities' in this region, the only one which comes anywhere near being self sufficient is run by the much tainted Hare Krsna mob. 900 hectares of prime ag land certainly helps, along with a pyramid authority structure and strong donor ethos among the many who work off-site. WWOOF is their labor base- with between 30 and 60 people working half time hours for keep. Communal food, what's grown on site and brought in, communal meal preparation for the 150-200 people on site, car pooling for off site workers.

The anti- structure consensus style communities tend to devolve into social security dependence, selfish lifestyles, like suburbia in the bush without the competition to consume so much. Almost no substantial food production, with the exception of in season fruits planted many years ago by the founding idealists.

If I somehow had a major economic windfall one thing I would love to do is tour the US with a focus on intentional communities. It seems from a distance that the work ethic being stronger there and perhaps a more militia oriented organizational structure in parts may make for a more resilient independence in the long run.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Ibon » Mon 21 Oct 2013, 03:51:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', '
')
I tell you this with absolute certainty: the rate of change is accelerating, not slowing. Some of you already want to hide from this, it would seem.


KJ, thanks for sharing this post. This went a long way in explaining the past that formed your present world view and for any of the younger crowd reading his post it is instructive. That your post was followed by VM's reference to psychedelics may seem totally unrelated but actually it was a perfect follow up.

KJ, I agreed with so much of your post when referencing the historical context and your conclusion that over population is the source of all our problems. We are 100% in agreement up to that point. That technology continues to accelerate I can also agree to an extent. Our differences are where you believe we should be directing that technology and that has to do with your erroneous belief that our planet will be wasted leaving us no alternative. Your past has been in the tech field. From the narrative of your post there is clearly the lack of any formal studies in ecology and natural history beyond some fishing trips you mentioned on an earlier post.

For all the younger readers here there are three lessons to pay attention to here

1) Ones bias and brilliance can get all mixed up and woven together so that you end up believing in wacky solutions.

2) Every one of us will follow this same mix up to some degree and as we age we represent the increasing obsolescence of our generation. That includes me , you , KJ, everyone. The emerging generations, who we all so often claim as being weaker (KJ states there are no heroes today. hahaha hubris bullshit) and more lost than our own, do always end up being given the reins and so often lay to waste the predictions of older generations. Why do we so often fail at predicting our future? Because the predictors are obsolete.

3) Everyone with a curious mind should have at least one chapter of their lives where they experiment with psychotropic drugs; ayahuasca, psilocybin, peyote, LSD, etc. if only to at least once if your life experience what Terence McKenna is stating (VM's post). To varying degrees you can add deep long journeys into the wilderness, yoga meditation etc. to free yourself from the tendency that your rational mind in the end cant leave the train tracks. KJ, lets repeat Terence Mckenna's quote once again and please consider how this applies to your rigid world view...

Psychedelics are illegal not because a loving government is concerned that you may jump out of a third story window. Psychedelics are illegal because they dissolve opinion structures and culturally laid down models of behaviour and information processing. They open you up to the possibility that everything you know is wrong


You can read from KJ's narrative that he has never derailed his thinking and allowed himself any other conclusion that the rigid dogma of conclusions that only finds solace in pressing the eject button of space ship earth.

KJ, what if the earth will not be ruined. What if this trajectory of accelerating advances in technology will one day be applied toward our life here on earth once the insidious consequences of over population are corrected by the Overshoot Predator?

What if this be the case?

Or what if we are only the first clumsy attempt of a sentient species trying to figure out how to wield our power. What if we go extinct and a few million years past before another sentient life form evolves and tries again. What is we are only a crude prototype of a sentient species?

Heroic can be accepting these truths.......
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Mon 21 Oct 2013, 04:02:14

A good jolt of DMT and KJ would never again mention willingly travelling to the void :)
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Mon 21 Oct 2013, 04:52:37

I did go to college and I did experiment with drugs - in the 1970's, and that is all I will say.

As for technology imperiling or saving the planet, let me say I place no credence in either man-caused Climate Change nor in any attempts at Engineering a solution. Sorry, but there is a problem of scale - and we don't have either the raw materials or the energy to effect planetary changes.

The damage done by humans is that of causing the extinction of many species. Everything from shooting passenger pigeons to fungal plagues that kill amphibians to taking multiple whales for whale oil. You could take an estimate of the number of plant and animal species on the Earth, divide by the average number of extinctions per year, and arrive at an estimate of when only man and his food species will survive.

What you call the "Overshoot Predator" and I call the Earthly Apocalypse will be IMHO a few hundred to a few thousand years when the remaining humans are pillaging the Earth in an effort to survive. But we will retain our hard-won technology, and at some point, a space habitat will be a cleaner, healthier, and more desirable place to live.

If you want to talk about geological time spans, that is how long it takes for evolution to make changes to a species. There were two species of hominids that are believed to have interbred with Cro-Magnon's to produce modern man, they are the Neanderthals and the Denisovans. The three species mixed some 30,000 to 50,000 years ago. There may have been three distinct species plus hybrids simultaneously in existence. Then the late Pleistocene Ice Age thinned the human herd down to perhaps as few as 35,000 hominids, as late as 15,000 years ago.

I'll not venture any guesses on that scale of years. But the fate of the Earth and the human species will be determined within say 2000 years.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby ralfy » Mon 21 Oct 2013, 06:05:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', '
')
I'm still scratching my head. It's not like anybody is in charge of the world and making bad decisions about which economic system we will choose.



Exactly. What you want is the opposite.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
From the days of the bloody October Revolution until the breakup of the USSR, another economic theory was tried, and failed. Now those pieces of the USSR are trying other theories, ranging from Capitalism to Oligarchy.



Actually, they are employing capitalism (state or free market), and that works against what you want, which requires conservation.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
The Chinese appear to be backing out of Communism into Capitalism as an evolutionary process.



Exactly. Don't expect to see conservation of resources soon.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
The Earth is one planet occupied by many tribes. The Americans are the most successful large tribe. The other tribes are emulating us which is not a bad plan.



It's not the "most successful large tribe" but the one that kept creating dollars which everyone used. And the fact that "other tribes are emulating us" is a very bad plan.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
Perhaps you overlooked the fact that economic systems do not get imposed or taught out of texts. We can study economies the same way we study other topics in Social Studies.



That's what I did, which is why I came up with conclusions that are making your scratch your head. You should follow your own advice.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
But nobody but the tribe as a whole decides what system we will use.



Which tribe? Notice that you are now derailing everything else you said in the same message that you posted.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
Railing against Capitalism is as productive as complaining that humans only have two legs. We many evolve out of the present state but it won't happen quickly. Capitalism has been enormously successful after all.


It's not about "railing" or "complaining" but showing that capitalism leads to more resource consumption. The transition that you want requires the opposite.

The irony, then, is that what makes capitalism "enormously successful" is also what will cause it to fall apart.
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby ralfy » Mon 21 Oct 2013, 06:17:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', '
')I will not dispute that need or the form it takes. Personally I do not think that the nature of man changes other than by the slow actions of evolution. I do not believe that man has changed to any appreciable extent in the century or century-and-a-half it took to build a society based upon dense hydrocarbon energy. I don't believe that we will evolve out of our problems, either. We will use our lately-acquired technology to save ourselves, but exactly what form that salvation takes is debatable.

I don't think mankind will learn to run Spaceship Earth. I don't think that the unknown captain of that spaceship is a deity called Gaia, either. I think we will flee the sinking Earth in the same way that passengers fled the HMS Titanic - in lifeboats. Those passengers that remained aboard that sinking ship did not die immediately, either. But ultimately those that did leave lived longer.

I get my own personal inspiration from vacationing in the wilderness, and feel at peace when the works of man are no longer in sight. This used to take the form of a strenuous backpacking expedition, nowadays it is days of peacefully prepping a Jeep Wrangler for comfortable back-country camping. Then dropping a fly or a spinning lure into a lake or stream completes the experience. If a fish is hooked, I am blessed with a fresh dinner.

Perhaps we are not so different, after all.


Everything you've written in this post puts to question everything else you posted, which argues the opposite.

It's also filled with contradictions, e.g., we won't evolve out of our problems, but we will "save" ourselves, which is the opposite.

Lifeboats? That makes even less sense, especially given the point in the first paragraph.

The biggest irony is the last paragraph, which reminds me of...Lovelock.
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Mon 21 Oct 2013, 06:57:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'I')Then the late Pleistocene Ice Age thinned the human herd down to perhaps as few as 35,000 hominids, as late as 15,000 years ago.


(Not a bad dissection Ralphy)

The quoted line above is complete hogwash invented by some desk jockey. Nobody has any realistic idea what the world population was in this period. Central Australia alone probably had greater numbers than this and was mixed rainforest at the time.

The idea that humans without abundant cheap energy can dominate the entire Earth is a total misunderstanding of scale. For an example have a read of this brief synopsis what it took for the first non aboriginals just to get from one end of Australia to the other- (something they would not have achieved without help of local aboriginals who had been there for at least 35,000 years)..:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McDouall_Stuart
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Mon 21 Oct 2013, 12:53:49

We are quibbling over details again. Let me summarize my views again:

The nature of mankind during the "Long Emergency" to come will not change to any appreciable extent. We will still be separated into insular tribes divided from one another by national borders and barriers of language, culture, and ethnicity. The human race has not measurably changed in that period we call "recorded history", and we have less than that amount of time before oil, gas, and coal are depleted.

We will not magically become wiser or more environmentally conscious, we will still be squabbling over petty differences when the die-off begins. We will instead still be in acquisition mode for automobiles, central heating, mobile electronics, and other consumer goods. As these things become less affordable and food becomes more dear, we will complain and change politicians at every election if in a Democracy. In less fortunate places, gang warfare resumes and spreads, without benefit of a United Nations or a large and powerful nation like the USA to intervene.

In the USA and every other developed nation, we will finally be realizing how serious the situation is. The knowledge that each Forum member here at "Peak Oil" has today will finally be generally accepted by all. It will of course be too late to effect worldwide change. It was already too late in 1900 AD, and now there are something between 8 and 10 billion humans on the globe.

Then the hard times begin. Within a hundred years cannibalism is widespread. The slow decline of cultural norms and the agonizing forms that resource depletion imposes upon formerly comfortable lifestyles are recorded in bit-perfect digital storage.

The lucky ones with the opportunity to move into a clean and safe off-world colony do so. By then there will be precious little opportunity for such, because the original space pioneers will have their own culture, and their own population problems. But they will need laborers to build more space colonies. The new immigrants will be second class citizens.

You see? Things are not so different, after all.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby vision-master » Mon 21 Oct 2013, 13:31:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'W')e are quibbling over details again. Let me summarize my views again:

The nature of mankind during the "Long Emergency" to come will not change to any appreciable extent. We will still be separated into insular tribes divided from one another by national borders and barriers of language, culture, and ethnicity. The human race has not measurably changed in that period we call "recorded history", and we have less than that amount of time before oil, gas, and coal are depleted.

We will not magically become wiser or more environmentally conscious, we will still be squabbling over petty differences when the die-off begins. We will instead still be in acquisition mode for automobiles, central heating, mobile electronics, and other consumer goods. As these things become less affordable and food becomes more dear, we will complain and change politicians at every election if in a Democracy. In less fortunate places, gang warfare resumes and spreads, without benefit of a United Nations or a large and powerful nation like the USA to intervene.

In the USA and every other developed nation, we will finally be realizing how serious the situation is. The knowledge that each Forum member here at "Peak Oil" has today will finally be generally accepted by all. It will of course be too late to effect worldwide change. It was already too late in 1900 AD, and now there are something between 8 and 10 billion humans on the globe.

Then the hard times begin. Within a hundred years cannibalism is widespread. The slow decline of cultural norms and the agonizing forms that resource depletion imposes upon formerly comfortable lifestyles are recorded in bit-perfect digital storage.

The lucky ones with the opportunity to move into a clean and safe off-world colony do so. By then there will be precious little opportunity for such, because the original space pioneers will have their own culture, and their own population problems. But they will need laborers to build more space colonies. The new immigrants will be second class citizens.

You see? Things are not so different, after all.


O Egypt, Egypt, of thy religion nothing will remain but an empty tale, which thine own children in time to come will not believe; nothing will be left but graven words, and only the stones will tell of thy piety. And in that day men will be weary of life, and they will cease to think the universe worthy of reverent wonder and of worship. And so religion, the greatest of all blessings, for there is nothing, nor has been, nor ever shall be, that can be deemed a greater boon, will be threatened with destruction; men will think it a burden, and will come to scorn it. They will no longer love this world around us, this incomparable work of God, this glorious structure which he has built, this sum of good made up of things of many diverse forms, this instrument whereby the will of God operates in that which be has made, ungrudgingly favouring man’s welfare, this combination and accumulation of all the manifold things that can call forth the veneration, praise, and love of the beholder.


Darkness will be preferred to light, and death will be thought more profitable than life; no one will raise his eyes to heaven ; the pious will be deemed insane, and the impious wise; the madman will be thought a brave man, and the wicked will be esteemed as good. As to the soul, and the belief that it is immortal by nature, or may hope to attain to immortality, as I have taught you, all this they will mock at, and will even persuade themselves that it is false. No word of reverence or piety, no utterance worthy of heaven and of the gods of heaven, will be heard or believed.


And so the gods will depart from mankind, a grievous thing!, and only evil angels will remain, who will mingle with men, and drive the poor wretches by main force into all manner of reckless crime, into wars, and robberies, and frauds, and all things hostile to the nature of the soul. Then will the earth no longer stand unshaken, and the sea will bear no ships; heaven will not support the stars in their orbits, nor will the stars pursue their constant course in heaven; all voices of the gods will of necessity be silenced and dumb; the fruits of the earth will rot; the soil will turn barren, and the very air will sicken in sullen stagnation. After this manner will old age come upon the world. Religion will be no more; all things will be disordered and awry; all good will disappear.


But when all this has befallen, Asclepius, then the Master and Father, God, the first before all, the maker of that god who first came into being, will look on that which has come to pass, and will stay the disorder by the counterworking of his will, which is the good. He will call back to the right path those who have gone astray; he will cleanse the world from evil, now washing it away with water-floods, now burning it out with fiercest fire, or again expelling it by war and pestilence. And thus he will bring back his world to its former aspect, so that the Kosmos will once more be deemed worthy of worship and wondering reverence, and God, the maker and restorer of the mighty fabric, will be adored by the men of that day with unceasing hymns of praise and blessing.


Such is the new birth of the Kosmos; it is a making again of all things good, a holy and awe-striking restoration of all nature; and it is wrought in the process of time by the eternal will of God. For Gods will has no beginning; it is ever the same, and as it now is, even so it has ever been, without beginning. For it is the very being of God to purpose good.


http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/profe ... ecia08.htm
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Mon 21 Oct 2013, 15:42:27

You are certainly welcome to any form of theology that comforts you. The situation is serious, and will cause discomfort for seniors like me, due to rising energy costs. The next generation faces more of that accompanied by increasing tax burdens. Their children are in actual peril.

I think I will take a page from pops, and leave my farm to the grandchildren. But my kid only just married and as yet I have none.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Mon 21 Oct 2013, 17:04:38

Most of us can't see too much difference between VM's Theology and your science fiction KJ.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Plantagenet » Mon 21 Oct 2013, 17:57:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '
')Doomers, religious nuts, and techtopians all share a common trait: the expectation that catastrophe, God, or Progress will take care of all our problems. I vote for catastrophe.


You can believe in progress without believing in Utopia. The technological progress we've seen since the invention of the steam engine and the start of the widespread use of fossil fuel is amazing.

Chances are we'll see more than enough catastrophe to satisfy even you, Peter, AND we'll probably see some progress as well in the years to come.

I vote for progress. :)
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby vision-master » Mon 21 Oct 2013, 18:46:20

Imagine the day when everyone can hold this crystal thingy in their hand and communicate with whoever they wish all over the world without 'big brother gatekeeper'. Direct connections.... 8)
vision-master
 

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby vision-master » Mon 21 Oct 2013, 18:51:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'M')ost of us can't see too much difference between VM's Theology and your science fiction KJ.


The Asclepius
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Plantagenet » Mon 21 Oct 2013, 20:47:57

By progress I don't mean techno-utopia or KJ's outer space colonies. I just mean steady grinding progress similar to what we've seen in the past.

landline phones become cell phones become smart phones....soon we'll have good wrist watch phones and google glasses and eventually tiny surgically implanted computers that will be with us (or will be us) constantly

Model Ts become chevys become toyotas become Teslas....soon we'll have smaller better faster cheaper electric cars, electric scooters, and maybe even some Elon Musk style hypertubes.

etc. etc.

OK....here goes the last one. Wood is replaced by peat is replaced by coal is replaced by oil is now being replaced by oil shale ......and in the future we'll rely mainly on NATURAL GAS.

It isn't utopia....but we'll continue to see a kind of progress. :)
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Mon 21 Oct 2013, 23:28:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'A')ll that would be required to start the next space race would be for NASA to report the discovery of a 500 ton gold asteroid. Then we would be stampeding into space, as once we stampeded into a harsh environment called the Yukon. A stampede that is still going on.
Is that more or less probable than finding a 500 ton gold nugget in the Yukon? Would you care to estimate numbers for each probability?

My point is, we have a pretty good idea of what asteroids (and the Earth) are made of, and it's not stuff that is going to start a gold rush.

Who is going to put up vast amounts of money so that the descendants of a minuscule fraction of the Earth's population can grow and multiply in space habitats. Can you see governments spending that money? Or capitalists? How would you sell such a high-risk investment with a generational payback time?
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Mon 21 Oct 2013, 23:49:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Beery1', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', 'S')aying someone is crazy is mildly insulting and should be avoided, by the same token using outright slurs or curse words should also be avoided.


An ironic sentence indeed when we consider that the title of the thread itself shows evidence of a slur.

The problem here is that some people only see insults when they're aimed at issues close to the beholder's heart. When skeptics are characterized as 'luddites', it becomes something like a case of the fox guarding the chicken coop.
Yeah, it should be "Sceptics vs. Fantasists" or "Luddites vs. Technotopians".
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron