Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Luddites vs Technologists

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Sun 20 Oct 2013, 02:35:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'K')aiser how do you expect to lift your machinery to Biosphere 3? Detail please. And when you arrive there, describe the hardware that will replenish O2, cleanse the soil, waters, and atmosphere to sustain your life? Or do you expect to live on candy bars?

You have neither explored nor countered the science that underlies Lovelocks' and Nasa's strategies for extraterrestrial research. Not surprising as you clearly stated science is garbage.


OK, let me make this clear:

I'm not leaving, I am staying. I have no need to understand what the details are, and neither do you. We have begun to explore space in my lifetime, the process will continue in spite of anyone's - or everyone's - opinions about how practical it is.

Fundamentally, there is one place crowded and running out of food and energy and everything that makes life pleasant and possible. Then there is another place where raw materials and energy and living space are for all practical purposes unlimited. We will spread into that space and transform it into places that humans can live. The process of leaving Earth will take centuries - the death of the Earth will take some thousands of years.

In spite of beliefs to the contrary, this migration into space will happen. In spite of all the desires of all the inhabitants, the Earth will still die. Those are both straight extrapolations from where we are today and assuming no fundamental changes to mankind or his nature.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Ibon » Sun 20 Oct 2013, 02:45:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', '
')
The Earth is one planet occupied by many tribes. The Americans are the most successful large tribe. The other tribes are emulating us which is not a bad plan.

But nobody but the tribe as a whole decides what system we will use. Railing against Capitalism is as productive as complaining that humans only have two legs. We many evolve out of the present state but it won't happen quickly. Capitalism has been enormously after all.


Digital technology and globalization has resulted in a homogenization of human culture which has accelerated. The diversity amongst all these human tribes is narrowing and converging. This reveals a vulnerability as less diversity results in less resilience. On the other hand the consequences up ahead will move through social networks and the media like all the other information that has made us more of a homogenized culture. These consequences will result in two currents, one will be to break apart this interconnectedness and we will see a return to more diversified strategies and regional and local responses.
The other will be a global understanding that feedbacks and consequences are also inter related and that they are the biosphere's response to global human overshoot.

Depending on the severity there is a tight rope that modern civilization will be walking. These strains and forces that draw us together and tear us apart will present opportunities of alliances and cooperation and convergences as well as ripping us apart in defensive tribal war fares etc. From this turmoil we can learn nothing and fall back several centuries or we can emerge with some collective sense of understanding about limits and then embed sustainability. Neither outcome is cast in stone. like most here I am not optimistic. But I put the odds surely greater than 1% that human culture will mature as a result of these upcoming consequences. Punctuated unstable times, both ecological and cultural, makes for very creative outcomes.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sun 20 Oct 2013, 03:47:35

KJ "Thousands of years for Earth to DIE"

I call total BS on that one. Earth will live for billions more years. With or without our progeny. There are critters adapted and adapting to virtually every natural environment and there will continue to be. None of us will live long enough to know if 'Space Man' will outlive 'Earth Man', so we can all argue 'til we are blue in the face on that point. My bet is not. Well and truly nowhere near it. The most resilient humans are the most adaptable to changing Earth, not to some yet to be built barely conceived space craft. Much sooner than this comes to fruition we could adapt to living as permanent sea gypsy tribal flotillas scavenging post collapse detritus and trading with our landlocked cousins doing something similar.

There are so many possibilities, almost endless. Let's keep trying the best of these and get rid of the worst. Space exploration has to rate as one of our best accomplishments, along with permaculture, closed loop agriculture, high tech communications, the bicycle with electric assistance, mosern medicine, contraception,- etc. War and it's machinations are our worst, our lowest. Which gets most attention, funding, focus in all manner of ways? Whilst this is the case, we need to sort ourselves out big time, rather than avoiding the fact.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby sparky » Sun 20 Oct 2013, 04:25:08

.
On the creation of sealed , self sustaining biospheres
there was one serious attempt
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosphere_2

What is interesting is not that they failed , that was to be expected ,
it's the lessons learned ,
the first one being a complete misunderstanding of soil as an active agent .
the second , strangely , is a stabilization at a lower level
obviously , attempts should proceed ,
even if only in an ecological experiment
User avatar
sparky
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3587
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Sydney , OZ

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Beery1 » Sun 20 Oct 2013, 07:10:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', 'S')aying someone is crazy is mildly insulting and should be avoided, by the same token using outright slurs or curse words should also be avoided.


An ironic sentence indeed when we consider that the title of the thread itself shows evidence of a slur.

The problem here is that some people only see insults when they're aimed at issues close to the beholder's heart. When skeptics are characterized as 'luddites', it becomes something like a case of the fox guarding the chicken coop.
"I'm gonna have to ask you boys to stop raping our doctor."
Beery1
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 690
Joined: Tue 17 Jan 2012, 21:31:15

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Sun 20 Oct 2013, 08:27:40

SeaGypsy, I meant that when humans can no longer live here, I considered it dead. It has no further interest. Now I see people arguing that when the diversity is gone, so are we. Then you seem to be saying that we will adapt even when most species will not.

OK, lets all agree that none of us know.

That still means each of us will continue to propose that alternative we each feel has the greatest chance of success.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Sun 20 Oct 2013, 08:29:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Beery1', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', 'S')aying someone is crazy is mildly insulting and should be avoided, by the same token using outright slurs or curse words should also be avoided.


An ironic sentence indeed when we consider that the title of the thread itself shows evidence of a slur.

The problem here is that some people only see insults when they're aimed at issues close to the beholder's heart. When skeptics are characterized as 'luddites', it becomes something like a case of the fox guarding the chicken coop.


Yes, but Tanada called HIMSELF a Luddite. It was not an insult as he did it, only a convenience. I have a friend who calls ME a Luddite because I refuse to carry a cellphone and consider those who use them in my presence to be rude.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sun 20 Oct 2013, 09:40:58

Lol, reminds me of my wife's tendency to mix up gender prefixes, Tanada is a herself. She is also a long way from the polarities she chose to begin this thread- which has so far been a good hit for reads and responses.

Hey KJ let's agree to hate war and love contraception? Then you can remind me of my dad and I might remind you of your youth. Don't worry too much about Beery, he is learning about polarity as a basis for discussion rather than a basis in fact.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Beery1 » Sun 20 Oct 2013, 13:40:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Beery1', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', 'Y')es, but Tanada called HIMSELF a Luddite. It was not an insult as he did it, only a convenience...


There's a big difference between self-deprecation and deprecating others, but deprecating oneself before laying scorn on someone else is a useful way to deflect criticism - politicians do it all the time. The word 'skeptic' is not extinct, nor is it some kind of anachronism, so the idea that 'luddites' was used for the sake of 'convenience' seems to me to be merely an excuse.
Last edited by Beery1 on Sun 20 Oct 2013, 13:44:08, edited 1 time in total.
"I'm gonna have to ask you boys to stop raping our doctor."
Beery1
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 690
Joined: Tue 17 Jan 2012, 21:31:15
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby vision-master » Sun 20 Oct 2013, 13:43:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Beery1', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Beery1', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', 'Y')es, but Tanada called HIMSELF a Luddite. It was not an insult as he did it, only a convenience...


There's a big difference between self-deprecation and deprecating others. The word 'skeptic' is not extinct, nor is it some kind of anachronism, so the idea that 'luddites' was used for the sake of 'convenience' is merely an excuse.


gobbledygook, u a speak a english?
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Sun 20 Oct 2013, 14:52:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'I') have no need to understand what the details are, and neither do you. We have begun to explore space in my lifetime, the process will continue in spite of anyone's - or everyone's - opinions about how practical it is.
Blind religious faith? Or are your grand assertions merely a simple nerd chick-attractor scheme? At 62 you are too old to be playing dress up at Comic-Con. LOL


No, just observation, over five decades of it. Electronics became my favorite toy when I was a child in the 1950's, playing with vacuum tubes. Then one of my college professors (John Bardeen) was one of three credited with inventing the transistor at Bell Labs. I took extra courses in History, Astronomy, and Economics just to satisfy some vaguely felt curiosities that sometimes seemed more like itches - things I had to scratch. Then the Dean had a serious talk with me and basically said I needed to go out and earn a living.

Politics became an interest when I helped my Father who was a volunteer poll worker in the 1960 election (JFK vs. Richard Nixon). Both candidates were Conservative and to the Right of center, they almost had nothing to debate. But I saw Mayor Daley (the elder) steal the election when thousands of dead Democrats voted, and began to understand the thirst for power. This was while living in a state where crosses were burned on people's lawns by men wearing sheets, and our Governor (Earl Long, younger brother of the "Kingfish") was governing the state from inside an asylum, from which he escaped by appointing his own man to administer the State hospitals. Then he shacked up with a stripper named Blaze Starr, who would subsequently bed JFK, and I was watching all this in wonderment with the eyes of a nine year old boy.

Our home in the suburbs of New Orleans was rocked by sonic booms from a nearby US Navy Air Station, and we were taught "duck and cover" in school, to save ourselves from nuclear weapons by hiding under our desks. My parents had a spirited debate about whether or not to build a fallout shelter during the Cuban Missile Crisis. At school, the teacher handed out a theme assignment, some four page paper related to current events, and the class laughed hysterically, knowing (in the 5th grade) that we would all be radioactive vapor by next week.

Later that next Summer, a strange little man named Nikita Khrushchev pounded his shoe on a table and promised on TV to bury us. It seemed credible, the USSR had after all beaten us into space. You have NO IDEA what the Cold War was like - I first felt relief when I viewed the inspired Stanley Kubrick film "Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb" - unfortunately I was already at University in the late 1970's.

This was when the pendulum swung back and the Republicans and Democrats really switched places and ideologies. The Republicans had been the Liberal party since the US Civil War, championing the rights of minorities. The Democrats had been the ultra Right Wing of American politics, the most extreme were called the Dixiecrats. The changing point was when Johnson succeeded JFK after he was shot. Johnson was an ultra-Liberal, just how much so surprised everyone, and was unusual for a man from Texas. Liberal Johnson's inclusion on the presidential ballot with Conservative JFK was what we then called a "balanced ticket" - which allowed the same pair of candidates to appeal to both Liberals and Conservatives, in an era when most campaigning was via local radio broadcasts and personal appearances. There was up until then, a span of political opinions stretching from Liberal to Conservative within each party. Following Johnson, the Liberals clustered in the Democratic party, while the Conservatives clustered in the Republicans. This was the beginning of the extreme partisanship which just paralyzed our Federal government.

I have seen the space race in it's entirety. I have seen the digital world replace the analog, including the advent of the Internet. I was on design teams for the unique computers that created and enabled the entire system of electronic money that enables Internet commerce. I have seen the arrival of environmental consciousness, which in my country began when Rachel Carson published The Silent Spring in 1962.

I tell you this with absolute certainty: the rate of change is accelerating, not slowing. Some of you already want to hide from this, it would seem.

Which is why I can tell you without any doubt whatsoever, that there are very few - perhaps zero - politicians interested in saving us from Climate Change. They will use you and your sincere beliefs to increase their own power - because if you are frightened enough, they get to spend more of your earnings than you do.

Now a related point: I have repeatedly made the point here that human overpopulation is the one and only environmental issue we face. It is the root cause of all the others, of all forms of pollution and all forms of resource depletion. Those 7.3B people are here already - they are not going anywhere. In their struggle to live, this planet that is our home will be ruined. Not ruined beyond redemption, not sterilized, just damaged for a Geological age, a few million years. Perhaps only a few thousand years if we can preserve the diversity of life in space, until we can again restore the Biosphere.

If we are wise, we will not let humans live there again.

Learn to separate the things that people DO from the things that people SAY. All it takes is carefull observation. Note that more often than not, they are saying and doing exactly opposite. Those few that both say and do the same things, and have the power to bring about change, are great men and women.

It just so happens there are no great men and women on the Earth today. There is no one to follow, no leadership to be had. The rest of us will have to muddle through, by doing the right things.
Last edited by KaiserJeep on Sun 20 Oct 2013, 15:17:40, edited 1 time in total.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby vision-master » Sun 20 Oct 2013, 15:09:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t just so happens there are no great men and women on the Earth today. There is no one to follow, no leadership to be had. The rest of us will have to muddle through, by doing the right things.


Yeah, Terence McKenna died in 2000.......

Image
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby vision-master » Sun 20 Oct 2013, 15:14:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'u')nbelievable. both of you.


lol - hiding behind that red-wood bong. :lol:
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby vision-master » Sun 20 Oct 2013, 15:39:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'G')otta agree with Mckenna on this. Humboldt exemplifies a cannabis-saturated society in America with more grow shops than hardware stores. Humboldt moves at a slow pace at it's surface. As the recognition of the benign aspects of the plant ascends, we should see more Humboldts.

We need to stop striving, consuming, competing with each other and nations. Let the machines feed us. Time to share our lives. And music.


-agreed-
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Tanada » Sun 20 Oct 2013, 16:23:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'L')ol, reminds me of my wife's tendency to mix up gender prefixes, Tanada is a herself. She is also a long way from the polarities she chose to begin this thread- which has so far been a good hit for reads and responses.

Hey KJ let's agree to hate war and love contraception? Then you can remind me of my dad and I might remind you of your youth. Don't worry too much about Beery, he is learning about polarity as a basis for discussion rather than a basis in fact.


Actually I chose a gender neutral Japanese name for my Peakoil profile name and I have been very careful to remain gender anonymous on this website. I prefer for my opinions to be viewed without a gender bias of any flavor. Different people have declared me male or female, the staff knows who I really am but the rest of you I do my best to keep in the dark. Make of that whatever you will.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sun 20 Oct 2013, 16:52:55

That's totally ok with me Vinessa :)

Hey Pstar, I'm around the Ozquivalent here these days except the retards in government are busy making more plants illegal not less. Pot has been decriminalized for small amounts for more than a decade so it's relaxed on that score, but we still get the chopper raids every harvest season and all that nonsense. I spent about 15 years around here in my younger days, so I'm kind of a local, kind of not. I'm finding the stoners pretty boring to be honest. I don't think these people have more than the average ability for independent thought- abysmally low. We all here know about sheeple and black sheep. Here I'm finding the black sheep are just another 'style' of sheeple mostly. Pretty disappointing, reminds why I left 15 years ago and probably will again soon.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron