Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Liberals flunk Econ 101

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Liberals flunk Econ 101

Unread postby Fishman » Fri 18 Oct 2013, 19:07:18

They seem to flunk it in Obamacare also. The rollout has been so bad healthy folks are not signing up. Only the sick are persisting through the quagmire. This will lead to a death spiral, only sick folks signing up makes insurance companies lose money, they raise the premiums next year and make things worst. If the Dems had actually folded on a year delay rollout in the individual mandate it would have actually been much better for then. And every conservative will be telling folks "we told you so"
Obama, the FUBAR presidency gets scraped off the boot
User avatar
Fishman
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Carolina de Norte

Re: Liberals flunk Econ 101

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Fri 18 Oct 2013, 19:12:18

One doesn't have to be a Republican or a Democrat to see the sense in the Australian model- which has universal and bipartisan support and costs most Aussies 1.5% of gross income. Nearly half still choose to have some private cover. It works, you Americans should try it sometime.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Liberals flunk Econ 101

Unread postby Subjectivist » Fri 18 Oct 2013, 20:50:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'O')ne doesn't have to be a Republican or a Democrat to see the sense in the Australian model- which has universal and bipartisan support and costs most Aussies 1.5% of gross income. Nearly half still choose to have some private cover. It works, you Americans should try it sometime.


Our pliticians never select a simple efficient system when a bloated bureaucratic mess is the alternative plan.
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Subjectivist
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4705
Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 07:38:26
Location: Northwest Ohio

Re: Liberals flunk Econ 101

Unread postby Fishman » Fri 18 Oct 2013, 20:57:17

But Sea, Obamacare is NOTHING like the Australian system. Its now 44,000 pages of regulations, twists and turns, power engulfing, job killing, tort lawyers wet dream, technological disaster. With the rollout designed by the very folks the Canadians tossed out. The venders and insurance companies warned the government the rollout would not work. But hubris, yes hubris rolled it out.
Obama, the FUBAR presidency gets scraped off the boot
User avatar
Fishman
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Carolina de Norte

Re: Liberals flunk Econ 101

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Fri 18 Oct 2013, 21:02:12

Yes Fish and Subjectivist, so I believe is the case.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Liberals flunk Econ 101

Unread postby vision-master » Sat 19 Oct 2013, 09:58:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Fishman', '[')u]They seem to flunk it in Obamacare also. The rollout has been so bad healthy folks are not signing up. Only the sick are persisting through the quagmire. This will lead to a death spiral, only sick folks signing up makes insurance companies lose money, they raise the premiums next year and make things worst. If the Dems had actually folded on a year delay rollout in the individual mandate it would have actually been much better for then. And every conservative will be telling folks "we told you so"



That's because your State Opted OUT fish head.
vision-master
 

Re: Liberals flunk Econ 101

Unread postby Tanada » Sat 19 Oct 2013, 10:21:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Fishman', 'B')ut Sea, Obamacare is NOTHING like the Australian system. Its now 44,000 pages of regulations, twists and turns, power engulfing, job killing, tort lawyers wet dream, technological disaster. With the rollout designed by the very folks the Canadians tossed out. The venders and insurance companies warned the government the rollout would not work. But hubris, yes hubris rolled it out.
It worked for Romney.



It worked for Romney in a Blue state where the majority of voters wanted that system in place.

That doesn't automatically mean it will work in Texas where the majority of voters do not want that same system in place.

I am very much in favor of a state by state solution and very much opposed to a top down one size fits all solution that the majority of voters have been against from day 1.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Liberals flunk Econ 101

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Sat 19 Oct 2013, 10:51:18

V - Sorry for the late response. "Daniel Yergin: Why OPEC No Longer Calls the Shots. The oil embargo 40 years ago spurred an energy revolution." The oil embargo, which only temporarily reduced US oil supplies by 8%, lead to higher oil prices which lead to a global recession which drove oil prices down to $12/bbl, greatly decreased drilling incentives and motivated a lack of concern about conservation. As far as OPEC calling not calling the shots: 10 years ago the world was transferring about $300 billion per year to OPEC for oil. Today that amount has increased to around $1 trillion per year. Thank goodness OPEC isn't "calling the shots"... think how much more we would be paying if we weren't in control.

Viva la revolution! LOL.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Liberals flunk Econ 101

Unread postby Fishman » Sat 19 Oct 2013, 17:15:58

Obamacare is not Romneycare.
Vision, always enjoy your lack of insight. Hawaii, supposedly the best prepared had to close theirs down for a period. In every state they need roughly at least a third of folks to be perfectly healthy to finance the others. Not happening, hopefully won't happen.
Obama, the FUBAR presidency gets scraped off the boot
User avatar
Fishman
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Carolina de Norte

Re: Liberals flunk Econ 101

Unread postby vision-master » Sat 19 Oct 2013, 17:29:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Fishman', 'O')bamacare is not Romneycare.
Vision, always enjoy your lack of insight. Hawaii, supposedly the best prepared had to close theirs down for a period. In every state they need roughly at least a third of folks to be perfectly healthy to finance the others. Not happening, hopefully won't happen.


http://www.mnsure.org/

FYI: Our insurance RATE's are LOW, because we formed our own insurance exchange. Why didn't your State do the same?

“A lot of people are going to blame the Affordable Care Act, when actually it’s North Carolina.”

http://www.carolinamercury.com/2013/08/ ... nce-plans/
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Liberals flunk Econ 101

Unread postby Fishman » Sun 20 Oct 2013, 16:42:13

Wow, thanks Vision, so glad my state decided not to waste our money on the ACA. Now Consumer Report recommends you avoid Healthcare gov for at least a month its such a disaster.
Obama, the FUBAR presidency gets scraped off the boot
User avatar
Fishman
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Carolina de Norte

Re: Liberals flunk Econ 101

Unread postby Fishman » Fri 25 Oct 2013, 09:18:14

Ah p stink, your lack of historical knowledge is as expected. NC tried so very hard to avoid the Democrat led Confederacy. It took a Republican to free the slaves.
And now, Dem Senators are bailing as the Obama Titanic.gov takes on more water. I laugh every time a libs goes "its the law, the supreme court upheld it." It shows such an ignorance of even the basics of legislature. The supreme court said its legal and its a tax. So, only 51 Senators have to vote against it then its no longer a tax or the law. It would be 2/3 majority but as the Unaffordable Care Act passed as a finance bill alone, all it takes is 51 (and 51 overrides a veto for such a bill). Even a delay by 51 puts it in more diress. Econ 101, Political Science 101
Obama, the FUBAR presidency gets scraped off the boot
User avatar
Fishman
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Carolina de Norte

Re: Liberals flunk Econ 101

Unread postby vision-master » Fri 25 Oct 2013, 09:27:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Fishman', 'A')h p stink, your lack of historical knowledge is as expected. NC tried so very hard to avoid the Democrat led Confederacy. It took a Republican to free the slaves.
And now, Dem Senators are bailing as the Obama Titanic.gov takes on more water. I laugh every time a libs goes "its the law, the supreme court upheld it." It shows such an ignorance of even the basics of legislature. The supreme court said its legal and its a tax. So, only 51 Senators have to vote against it then its no longer a tax or the law. It would be 2/3 majority but as the Unaffordable Care Act passed as a finance bill alone, all it takes is 51 (and 51 overrides a veto for such a bill). Even a delay by 51 puts it in more diress. Econ 101, Political Science 101



Great, repeal Obamacare and then do what with all the uninsured?

List the Republican plan here

[ ________________________________________________________]
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Liberals flunk Econ 101

Unread postby Threepwood » Fri 25 Oct 2013, 15:05:50

I think a fair test to pass before being able to run for president, would be to compete with an average 7 yr old girl operating a lemonade stand.

Unless she hired unionized workers operating wind powered lemon squeezers and required online registration before quoting a price.. we'd have ended up with a more economically savvy leader :-D
Threepwood
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed 23 Oct 2013, 12:26:04

Re: Liberals flunk Econ 101

Unread postby Lore » Fri 25 Oct 2013, 15:13:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Threepwood', 'I') think a fair test to pass before being able to run for president, would be to compete with an average 7 yr old girl operating a lemonade stand.

Unless she hired unionized workers operating wind powered lemon squeezers and required online registration before quoting a price.. we'd have ended up with a more economically savvy leader :-D


Maybe we could get Ted? He sold me on green eggs and ham.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet
Top

Re: Liberals flunk Econ 101

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Fri 25 Oct 2013, 15:25:56

"Great, repeal Obamacare and then do what with all the uninsured?" Easy...let them buy their own insurance just like the 85% of the American people do now. And if they can't afford it let the govt help subsidize it for them like they help them in other areas such as food stamps, etc. Why involve every American citizen in restructuring their health insurance dynamic to help a small minority? The govt should provide assistance for those who need it and leave the rest of us alone IMHO.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Liberals flunk Econ 101

Unread postby Lore » Fri 25 Oct 2013, 15:38:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', '&')quot;Great, repeal Obamacare and then do what with all the uninsured?" Easy...let them buy their own insurance just like the 85% of the American people do now. And if they can't afford it let the govt help subsidize it for them like they help them in other areas such as food stamps, etc. Why involve every American citizen in restructuring their health insurance dynamic to help a small minority? The govt should provide assistance for those who need it and leave the rest of us alone IMHO.


Because a growing number of people already cannot afford any type of healthcare, yet they use our hospitals. It ends up costing everyone more then.

I would add that about 110 million people already rely on Medicaid/Medicare.

If you believe in the right to life as an essential freedom, then you should be advocating that all people in the world's wealthiest country have a right to health.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron