Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Ethics With Limited Resources

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Ethics With Limited Resources

Unread postby Tanada » Mon 14 Oct 2013, 12:24:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', 'N')ice delete there Tanadra.

Why the knowledge filters?

What's YOUR agenda anyways, eh?

I post a response about current day ethics and you haven't the ethics to leave it well enough alone?

You posted an image related to all the Maya calendar hype of last year without commentary or explanation. Images without context are frowned upon and attempts to derail an actual discussion about ethics with a very minor religion point of view are not appreciated.

Given you just got back from a forced vacation I urge you to exercise caution questioning moderator actions in public. This will be your one and only further warning on this type of public posting.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: Ethics With Limited Resources

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Mon 14 Oct 2013, 16:20:13

Our ethics virtually identical Tanada :) I wonder if that's why you put this up come to think of it, to help us know each other a little better?

That pyramid pic of Visions was somewhat interesting in the context of priorities in ethics- though I agree it seems a little late for the world ending last year.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Ethics With Limited Resources

Unread postby vision-master » Mon 14 Oct 2013, 16:34:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'O')ur ethics virtually identical Tanada :) I wonder if that's why you put this up come to think of it, to help us know each other a little better?

That pyramid pic of Visions was somewhat interesting in the context of priorities in ethics- though I agree it seems a little late for the world ending last year.


That's not what it was about, sorry, sometimes my thoughts are too advanced for this place.

So be it. :)
vision-master
 

Re: Ethics With Limited Resources

Unread postby Tanada » Mon 14 Oct 2013, 17:00:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'O')ur ethics virtually identical Tanada :) I wonder if that's why you put this up come to think of it, to help us know each other a little better?


Now there is a scary thought!

I put this up because it requires people who are honest with themselves to actually think about what the best answer is to themselves and why. Plus I was curious what everyone would say. Once you have done one of these exercises you have dusted off your internal mental machinery and made it turn over a bit so facing real decisions is just a tiny bit easier. Plus knowing that at least one other person somewhat agrees with you gives you emotional CYA if you ever have to face a decision that is this grim in its outlook.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Ethics With Limited Resources

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Mon 14 Oct 2013, 17:06:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'O')ur ethics virtually identical Tanada :) I wonder if that's why you put this up come to think of it, to help us know each other a little better?


Now there is a scary thought!



We are both married mature adults, with understanding spouses as to why we spend so much time together- so what's to be scared of lol? :lol:
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Ethics With Limited Resources

Unread postby Newfie » Mon 14 Oct 2013, 21:36:42

Tanda,

I've given this thread some thought and think I have something additional to share. I objected strongly to being asked what my choices would be for reasons stated above.

What, to me, would be a better question would be to ask us to each come up with a FORMULA we could enact into law by which we could make the decision.

Too tired right now to do that exercise myself. Maybe tomorrow.

But the first line would likely be to subtract age from 85, to come up with a base score, then........
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Ethics With Limited Resources

Unread postby Simon_R » Tue 15 Oct 2013, 04:25:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hat, to me, would be a better question would be to ask us to each come up with a FORMULA we could enact into law by which we could make the decision.


Interesting, but before, we would need to know are we dealing with n people in isolation, or a whole population that need resources allocated, ie. the big picture or not.
Simon_R
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Thu 16 May 2013, 09:28:06
Top

Re: Ethics With Limited Resources

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Tue 15 Oct 2013, 05:00:08

Law, like society and family, is despite all illusions otherwise, an opt in- opt out situation- else there would be no need for prisons.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Ethics With Limited Resources

Unread postby Simon_R » Tue 15 Oct 2013, 05:43:06

Granted.

Probably more correct would be.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')an we develop a heurism that could be used to manage healthcare resources, where society is suffering a decline in wealth


You could opt in/out of course, by simply paying ...

This of course could lead to the touchy subject, of, 'which is the best healthcare model'
Simon_R
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Thu 16 May 2013, 09:28:06
Top

Re: Ethics With Limited Resources

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Tue 15 Oct 2013, 05:49:59

SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Ethics With Limited Resources

Unread postby Pops » Tue 15 Oct 2013, 08:02:36

I guess I don't get the relevance of what kind of god each of us fancy ourselves. Not being a Christian I guess I don't get the bit about "judge not..."

The material question in rationing care should be what procedure/method provides the greatest good, not which subjective criteria entitles which patient to a procedure and least of all which procedure is most profitable..

Dialysis saves a life each time it is used, without it the patient in renal failure dies, that is 100% efficiency and in my book anything that is 100% efficient should be the last thing rationed. Not so some other procedures:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '1'). Unexplained variation in the intensity of medical and surgical services, including but certainly not limited to: end of life care, overuse of coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and overuse of percutaneous coronary procedures (PCI), with potential avoidable costs of up to $600 billion;
2. Misuse of drugs and treatments, resulting in avoidable adverse effects of medical treatment that could save $52.2 billion;
3. Overuse of non-urgent emergency department (ED) care that could save (conservatively) $21.4 billion;
4. Underuse of generic antihypertensives, with potential savings of $3 billion;
5. Underuse of controller medicines in pediatric asthma, particularly inhaled corticosteroids, with projected savings of $2.5 billion; and
6. Overuse of antibiotics for respiratory infections, with potential savings of $1.1 billion.

Link
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Ethics With Limited Resources

Unread postby dbruning » Tue 15 Oct 2013, 13:31:34

1. 35 year old Housewife, mother of 2.
2. 20 year old College student
3. 35 year old Teacher
4. 9 year old disabled Child, if the disability was life threatening/extremely severe then I'm afraid she would be bumped, but otherwise I'm a softy on protecting the children.
5. 47 year old Police Officer.
6. 23 year old Prostitute

If the child was bumped, would put the Doctor in.

From what I am seeing, it appears I care a great deal more about the young getting a chance to live.

The Ethnicity didn't mean jack to me, and I ignored it pretty much. Skin color isn't important, actions are. Without more information in the test, that particular metric is absolutely useless, same as the marriage status.

In a real world situation, I would demand a LOT more information on each candidate than what was provided here. :P
User avatar
dbruning
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 486
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Vancouver Island

Re: Ethics With Limited Resources

Unread postby Peak_Yeast » Tue 15 Oct 2013, 16:39:35

Occupation_____Age______Sex/Ethnicity_____ Children_____Status________Score
College Student________20________M, W____________None________Single_____________1
Housewife ______35_______F, W_____________M:12, F:7____Married___________2
Prostitute______23________F, W_____________F:3__________Single____________3
Teacher________35________M, B____________None_________Married___________4
Doctor__________65_______M, L______________None_______Married___________5
Police Officer_________47________M, B____________None_________Divorced__________6
Lawyer_________60_______M, B_____________M:25________Married___________7
Minister (Lutheran)______55________F, W___________F:30, M:27_____Married___________8
Autistic/Disabled Person__________9________F, W_____________None________Single____________9
Ex-Convict Manslaughter___40________M, B____________M:13, M:10____Married___________10

I supposed the autism was severe - i.e. not able to function without professional help.
I supposed the Manslaughter was a murderer - not accidental, but i suppose it was my bad english that led to that understanding. Besides the children has a mother - and if he was a bad apple then no severe problem.
The doctor was important to keep the health of the rest of the population and teach others.
"If democracy is the least bad form of government - then why dont we try it for real?"
User avatar
Peak_Yeast
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Tue 30 Apr 2013, 17:54:38
Location: Denmark

Re: Ethics With Limited Resources

Unread postby sparky » Fri 18 Oct 2013, 20:56:39

.
You make them pay for it , those who offer the most get it ,
after all the frame of reference is a country where buying out a congressman is a valid tax deduction
User avatar
sparky
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3587
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Sydney , OZ

Re: Ethics With Limited Resources

Unread postby Fishman » Fri 18 Oct 2013, 21:28:08

My word what a bunch of wussies. This is a standard death panel question. One which the IPAB will have to address. Sorry pops this is a huge cost of resources, you assume far more resources than many places have. This very question proves health care is NOT a right. It can never be a right, its a use of resources, that may be utilized in different manners. Opinion only
Doc dies, age 65
Autistic child(sorry) dies - huge amount of resources needed in the future
Prost dies, risk of death from hep c, hiv very high regardless
Last one is tough - but - Shakespeare rules - first we get rid of all the lawyers

All health care systems make decisions like this on a routine basis
Obama, the FUBAR presidency gets scraped off the boot
User avatar
Fishman
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Carolina de Norte

Re: Ethics With Limited Resources

Unread postby Subjectivist » Fri 18 Oct 2013, 21:54:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Fishman', 'M')y word what a bunch of wussies. This is a standard death panel question. One which the IPAB will have to address. Sorry pops this is a huge cost of resources, you assume far more resources than many places have. This very question proves health care is NOT a right. It can never be a right, its a use of resources, that may be utilized in different manners. Opinion only
Doc dies, age 65
Autistic child(sorry) dies - huge amount of resources needed in the future
Prost dies, risk of death from hep c, hiv very high regardless
Last one is tough - but - Shakespeare rules - first we get rid of all the lawyers

All health care systems make decisions like this on a routine basis


Actually in the USA thousands of vegetative dialysis patients are treated three times every week by Medicare and Medicade patients, everyone is afraid to turn them away because the lawyers would eat them alive. No Doctor would dare say no and many would even recomend treatment for patients that have valid DNR paperwork. When my dad was in the ICU in 2008 they thought he might need dialysis, fortunately he rallied and lived another four years. I was shocked to discover how much treatments cost for a year.

http://kidney.niddk.nih.gov/kudiseases/pubs/kustats/#18

In 2008 & 2009 the cost was $82,000.00 per patient per year.
That is more money than he earned in any single year from age 16 to 68 when he retired. At age 81 after he recovered he decided he didn't want anything like a three time a week treatment for the rest of his life, but his kidneys recoverd so it wasn't necessary.
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Subjectivist
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4705
Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 07:38:26
Location: Northwest Ohio
Top

Re: Ethics With Limited Resources

Unread postby Shaved Monkey » Sat 19 Oct 2013, 04:04:08

The autism would need to be defined Einstein was thought to have aspergers a form of Autism,then again do we value focused intelligence with no empathy.
The ex con who committed man slaughter would need to be defined,one off act of passion assisted suicide or one off bad decision behind the wheel.
I would save the doc as the doc is a necessary part of society regardless of age
The lawyer isnt.
Teacher depends on what they taught,if it was exponential growth economics it would be no dialysis for you.
Prostitute could just be a out of luck junkie with father issues or a psych student working their way through university.
I would have to interview the minister, preachy self righteous religious nut job isn't an asset,compassionate, self less giver may be.
Ready to turn Zombies into WWOOFers
User avatar
Shaved Monkey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2578
Joined: Wed 30 Mar 2011, 01:43:28

Re: Ethics With Limited Resources

Unread postby Newfie » Sat 19 Oct 2013, 22:32:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', '
')


Occupation_____Age______Sex/Ethnicity_____ Children_____Status________Score

Housewife ______35_______F, W_____________M:12, F:7____Married___________

Doctor__________65_______M, L______________None_______Married___________

Lawyer_________60_______M, B_____________M:25________Married___________

Autistic/
Disabled
Person__________9________F, W_____________None________Single____________

College
Student________20________M, W____________None________Single_____________

Ex-Convict
Manslaughter___40________M, B____________M:13, M:10____Married___________

Prostitute______23________F, W_____________F:3__________Single____________

Teacher________35________M, B____________None_________Married___________

Minister
(Lutheran)______55________F, W___________F:30, M:27_____Married___________

Police
Officer_________47________M, B____________None_________Divorced__________


Key:
M=Male F=Female B=Black L=Latino W=White
The number next to the children’s sex is their age. For example,
M:17 means the child is a 17 year old male.


ANSWER 1... Based on our common morals, underlying ethic is to promote humanity.

85 less age
Female under 30 ....add 10 ...promote childbearing
Well educated....add 10. Can help others
Felon....subtract 10 ....not a team player
Energy, ability to contribute ....add 5

Answer 2.....same as above but in more constrained system

Of my race. Add 10
Same language. Add 10
Same country ...add 10
cheers for same football team...add 10

Answer 3......the Al Bartlett answer

Take answer 1 and reverse it. There are too damn many humans now and we have to reduce population so get on with it.

Answer 4......mine

I don't know, it depends and is all situational, and I'm a coward and a weenie.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean
Top

Re: Ethics With Limited Resources

Unread postby lamorgaine » Fri 25 Oct 2013, 19:43:12

I find it very interesting that we are asked to solve a medical problem and given very little medical information upon which to base the solution.

This is not initially an ethical problem, it is medical. Kidney failure can have many different causes, some are reversible and some are not.

Some of the information I would require before answering the question would be found in a complete health history of the people under consideration. Most importantly - why do they need the dialysis? Is the kidney failure acute or chronic? Does each person require the same frequency of dialysis? What are the co-morbidities? How compliant have the patients in question been with previous medical care?(compliant patients, in general, will usually only require their scheduled treatments, whereas those who are not compliant will require more than their scheduled treatments to rescue them from the consequences of their actions)

Without knowing the answers to these and other medical questions I don't believe it is possible to appropriately decide who is treated, regardless of how closely we examine their social/economic situation.
lamorgaine
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri 25 Oct 2013, 19:25:30

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

cron