by rollin » Sat 14 Sep 2013, 11:07:37
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MD', 'B')ack on point: carried to the extreme, "robotics" will create (and is creating) an economic model that requires almost no human labor. Our entire workforce model is changing as a result.
We could shut them all off and go back to humans performing the "dull, dirty, and dangerous" tasks, but should we? A strong argument can be made for both sides of that question, but in the mean time our global manufacturing base is racing to make the robot world a reality. Are you ready to join the borg yet?
Without a major change in technology, the dream of producing a near human or highly capable robot will not occur. The first difficulty is heat dissipation, producing anything near the 300 million MIPS required and putting it in a small package would require lots of power and melt the brain anyway. Standard circuitry could require 10 megawatts. We might be able to get them up to the level of bugs, not bad since bugs work fairly well.
The second difficulty is that we do not understand how brains really work. We may eventually be able to simulate animal and human brain activity through molecular level computing and a totally different computing paradigm, but the robot will not view the world as we do. We will have created something new, something completely unlinked to nature and therefor potentially extremely dangerous. The way it views the world will be completely alien. Just use us as an example, we are natural but our brains are less hardwired and more dissociated from following natural patterns compared to other animals. See what that has done?
A more major difficulty is, how does this solve the energy, population and resource problems? Without solutions to those, our bug intelligent robots will be merely a few toys destined to fall with us.
Personally, I think humans are trying to solve problems that don't really exist. They have created machines and now are running around trying to find ways to continue the machine existence. Who is running the show here, why are we so concerned about maintaining a bunch of constructs? Are they holding our children for ransom or will their continued energy sucking existence kill off our children and the children of other species? Time to answer a few good questions?
Just because we have an idea, does not mean it is a good idea.
Once in a while the peasants do win. Of course then they just go and find new rulers, you think they would learn.