by Ibon » Sun 17 Mar 2013, 06:03:36
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'I')bon,
I just don't see the future in the same way you do. I have lost all hope that mankind can do anything to stop what is going on.
I am cynical through and through.
Newfie, you make perfect sense and I feel compelled into a long ramble here and I will share an unpleasant detail. I am stuck taking laxatives today in preparation for a colonoscopy tomorrow. I am 56 and have never had one and it is overdue so I will spend the next few hours between the toilet and addressing your post.
In the 70’s Carter (who by the way just represented a sentiment of the collective since leaders never exist in vacuums) for a time promoted sustainability and self-sacrifice. Carter interestingly was and is a spiritual man.
Reagan (who by the way just represented a sentiment of the collective since leaders never exist in vacuums) promoted empire and American supremacy. (sustainability and self-sacrifice be damned as he symbolically ordered the solar panels removed from the white house roof).
The hippies threw off their burlap recycling ideology and first became yuppies with fancy REI camping gear stashed in the back of their Volvo station wagons before morphing into wallstreet bankers in one short generation.
It is perhaps interesting that the complete lack of any sentiment of self-sacrifice in the collective today is partially related to the secularization of our society, the abandonment of the social glue that binds cultures together who follow religious dogma. For all the stupidity of religious dogma one cannot deny the aspects of it that have social value. The fact that it is based on the belief in an invisible man in the sky doesn’t change that and like you Newfie I am an atheist. I am however like Carter a spiritual person as I suspect you are as well.
Carter’s religious sentiments where those of a spiritual person, Reagans lip service of religion was that of an actor, a politician, like most modern day republican politicians who put American imperialism and exceptionalism before any of the humble aspects of the religions they pay lip service to. But this is not about the political divide since the democrats are only wearing the thinnest veneer of green that covers their support of the status quo.
Somewhere around my late 30’s I began to understand that one’s individual journey toward self-actualization was not the whole story in how we, as individuals, perceive reality and that there is a tremendous force in the collectives that surround us.
One has to pay attention to how collective sentiments affect cultures and individual perceptions. In fact every leader you can think of, weather good or evil (permit me this binary thinking) emerged from a soup that was cooking in the collective and did not rise in a vacuum. No exceptions. Even Jesus Christ. The collective sentiments in a culture are powerful.
Even naturalists in the Victorian age of the 19th and beginning of the 20th century were not able to dismiss the collective social morals of their time when describing the natural history around them. We see this in the sciences that is supposed to be rational.
I see the emerging collective cynicism today encompassing ideologies that spread from far right to far left. It’s interesting to pay attention to forces that dissolve polarities, like the poster who mentioned that discussions about growing food is one of those rare dialogs that can bond conservatives and liberals together at a farmers market.
This collective cynicism is directly related to the nihilism you mention regarding the downside of an atheistic point of view that leaves the individual flapping in the wind. But humans are not cats and there is no torture worse than solitary confinement to a human being. We are genetically predisposed toward social interaction whether it be HG tribal arrangements or Facebook.
Back to what Heinberg said about real revolutions happening when the pillars of a societies beliefs are undermined by ecological instability. Or what Sea Gypsy said in his post above, “We have collectively lost sight of our real resilience, the one we have had all along, that which came from nature”
This might sound like ideology or like the sentiment that Carter was trying to promote in the 70’s but this time around it is not an ideological war between self-sacrifice and consumerism. It is nature, through those consequences of Kudzu Ape’s collective behavior on the planet, that will set the agenda. That will mold the collective. And cynicism can not prevail for long once the consequences start to bite.
A collective vision of self-sacrifice toward self preservation, if it does emerge, will be asymmetrical in where it starts. There is a chance this could start in North America, as counter intuitive as this may seem considering that the USA has been the global empire of consumption.
It is much more than just a sentiment about self sacrifice. This can be warped as we see today in Chinese culture and their pathological relationship with money. A Confucian principal of delayed gratification, which could be interpreted as a form of self sacrifice as in delay your gratification to save your money to provide a good education for your children has been warped into something pathological as the Chinese will work 80 hour weeks and seek out money with the myopic vision of a mole. The Chinese and Asian continent in general never had the Rachel Carson’s, John Muir’s, the Henry Thoreau’s, The Theodor Roosevelt’s to plant the seed of a wilderness ethic or protection of the commons. The continent is doomed where restaurants unashamed have dried shark fins on their windows advertising shark fin soup and all the other exotic animals. Look at south east Asia if you want to warm your cynic’s heart. A hot spot of biodiversity with limited land mass that is being converted to a monoculture of industrial crops, resource hungry and overpopulated by a people that have zero respect for the commons or for environmental concerns. The collective there is on the ascendency and there is nothing on the short term horizon to change that especially with that sucking sound to the north which is the sound of the Chinese sucking up the regions resources. But I digress.
In fact the collective cynicism today, like what Pops said, is the pathway through the bottleneck, at least initially, because we have to become cynics about the existing paradigms that are failures to sustain, but this cynicism will be short lived in my view, replaced by an era where self-sacrifice has the chance to emerge again. If the consequences are severe enough, even the religious dogma may be molded by this. In fact, all religions, whether monotheist (Islam, Judism or Christianity) or eastern (Buddhism or Hinduism) were failures at anticipating overshoot and incorporating rules and tabus in their dogma to prevent this. Why? Because these religions where born of a time that famine and disease still kept us within carrying capacity so it is obvious that the spiritual teachings of these religions where centered on humans getting with themselves and along with other humans and had nothing or very little to say about humans getting along with their planet.
I had another realization at some point when I was young and travelling through developing countries where I romanticized village life when seeing the humility and generosity of poor people in rural areas. I thought this was somehow intrinsic to their culture until I realized it was really purely economics and being poor and that if you would give a million dollars to any thousand poor agrarian folks of any culture maybe only 5 of those 1000 would maintain any real humility and purity of soul while the other 995 would go about chasing consumption with the same zeal as America did during the past couple of generations or how the Chinese are currently doing. This realization was pure porn for the cynic in me. For I understood that only in the 20th century did we deviate from the historical norm where a small elite held rule over serfs or slaves or peons. Fossil fuels permitted the emergence of wealth to spread from the elite down to the sprawling middle classes who took that wealth and squandered it as Kunstler said in the greatest misallocation of resources in the history the world. Can you blame capitalism or the media or corporations. I don’t think so. Can you blame agriculture and civilization and take refuge romanticizing our hunter gatherers? I don’t think so.
It is at this point Newfie that the cynic in you has washed your hands and given up fully on humanity to deal with the crisis coming our way. There is a cynic in me that sees this as well.
The consequences that will unfold in this century or the next however will be historical for they do offer the possibility (only the possibility) that we can plant the seeds of ideologies that do promote sustainability and self preservation.
Back to North America, its political and economic system in a serious funk. It’s whole way of life built on an unsustainable infrastructure. A country in contraction faced with emerging global powers. Cynicism will greatly multiply as the system can’t deliver the dream and so a new dream will emerge from the cynicism, hopefully aided by consequences that will mold the collective. It could very well be like John Michael Greer suggests in his recent essay that a new American dream could emerge as it de industrializes down, a dream that draws on the sentiments of Carson’s, Muirs, Roosevelts , wendel berrys etc.
This is all one can pin ones hopes on at the moment. That consequences will tug at the recessive noble sentiments still lying somewhere in the collective subconscious, somewhere down there that also still remembers the call of the wild, the roots of our connection with our planet and mother earth.
Is Kudzu Ape just a rapacious consumer, unhinged like an invasive species due to technology and fossil fuels to convert the biomass of the whole planet to serve it or does there lie still that more noble place for our species in its relationship with our planet?
My cynical heart welcomes the dismantling of the paradigm that is ending but this cynicism does not extend beyond the time when the consequences bear down on us. Therein lies a mystery that is beyond prediction that should not exclude the possibility of the emergence of more noble sentiments around how we relate to our planet. For the sake of our children and to all those who come we owe them the possibility of this vision.
Do consequences drive ideology or will ideology affect the consequences. Carter tried the latter. It didn’t work. The former is all we have to pin our hopes to. Watch the mood of the collective as the consequences unfold and watch the leaders who emerge from the collective soup. I do predict a resurging and powerful environmental movement somewhere up ahead.
This is a long unedited ramble….. a diarrhea of thoughts, pun intended.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com