by SeaGypsy » Sat 02 Feb 2013, 22:21:51
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '
')
Relevant for modern society it is far better to define peak oil by the cost of energy whose consequence excludes you from being part of the privileged still able to consume it. A few obvious early examples; when you can no longer afford to own and maintain an automobile. When you can no longer afford airplane tickets.
A little later on it will go like this. At some point increasing energy costs will create an inflationary economic environment where you will see your ability to consume slowly curtailed back to the very basics in a steady progression until you are a member of the underclass, a peasant, a serf.
A growing trend among the older generation in Australia is to buy a caravan, motorhome, RV or some such nomadic life tool.
While this looks like increasing consumption, looking beneath the surface, the numbers stack up as being relatively benign.
Called 'Grey Nomads', the model goes something like:
Mr & Mrs Smith, working class, retired, sell their home for about $500k.
They spend about $50k on a nice 4 wheel drive and another $50k on a tow along caravan with all the mod-cons. The other $400k goes into some kind of investment fund. (Of course some don't have these resources and do a 'poor man's version' of same.)
The Smiths follow the sun, seeking the endless summer. If they have the money, they stay in trailer parks (caravan parks in Australia). Otherwise they camp in the many thousands of short term free spots provided along the highways, in national parks and state forests.
As an aged pension couple, the Smiths get about $550 a week to live.
It is about 3500 km from the far north to the far south of the continent. Towing a van, about 2 weeks pension will get them from one end of the country to the other (at current costs). Following the seasons, food can be bought cheaply and minimal heating/ cooling expenses are necessary. Many Grey nomads will travel about 100- 200 km each pay check, or every 2 weeks. They can do this only refueling every 6 to 12 weeks.
These people become experts on travelling over time and saving money. Many will pick fruit seasonally to supplement their pensions. Many make friends both on the road and along the way. Some find their favorite places and become part time community members.
There is the argument that this is not sustainable in the long run. However fuel can become much more expensive before stopping these people in their tracks. Meanwhile, they are building connections to remote communities, making themselves useful and finding their dreams sometimes coming true. If/ when stopped in their tracks, it will often be with far more options than people who have stayed in one place.
My point here is that 'downsizing' may not mean deleting mechanized transport in favor of micro farming or serfdom in the median term. The key investment for many people might be the means of flexibility and travel to 'get out there' and find themselves. One doesn't have to be an intrepid sailor or backpacker to avail themselves a much broader pallet of life than they would just staying put and waiting to be put on the bread line or chain gang.
IMO, owning land is over-rated. Especially when it comes to a more energy restricted world, the value of direct human physical labor will become again a very important part of sustaining any community. A 100 acre farm which relies on mechanical inputs run by a nuclear family may quickly die as these inputs become unsustainable. The same farm with 50 dedicated workers may both sustain those people and allow some surplus to trade. In this case, with diminished outside authority, the social structure of each farm becomes much more flexible and adaptable- not necessarily a serf/ landlord relationship at all. The landlord must keep his/ her team together and cooperative, foster trust and good relations. We serfs of the future are not quite the utterly naive illiterates we might have been before the industrial revolution.
This is my rainbow thread in the dark tapestry of our age.