Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

16 Counties Defy Obama NDAA Indefinite Detention

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: 16 Counties Defy Obama NDAA Indefinite Detention

Unread postby ennui » Tue 04 Sep 2012, 20:30:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')We can't agree on anything. We make stupid choices in our own lives and value things that don't matter above the things that truly do. Its a circus; both in the Congress and on the streets. You cannot expect more from your government than We the People expect from ourselves. Before you make any attempt to fix the government, first fix yourself and your neighbor. In this country, the people get exactly what they want and deserve.


Amen. Best post on peakoil.com ever!!!

This is the sort of tone I used to push here all the time and I got excoriated for it, because I wasn't always railing against TPTB and fearing we'd all be thrown into FEMA camps. Glad to know someone else has a dose of sanity.
ennui
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 10:24:33

Re: 16 Counties Defy Obama NDAA Indefinite Detention

Unread postby Cloud9 » Tue 04 Sep 2012, 21:29:27

John,I am well aware of Lord Lyon’s threat of war over the Trent Affair and Lincoln’s comment regarding one war at a time. England had recognized the Confederacy as a belligerent. England’s upper class had a fondness for the southern aristocracy. Many southern families claimed aristocratic linage. These claims by the supposed second sons of the south lent an element of credence to British aristocratic claims of exceptionalism.

I won’t argue with you about Lincoln’s racism. That was evident in his early speeches about preserving the union. I will argue that emancipation was a potent weapon for the north and gained for Lincoln the upper hand in the battle for hearts and minds both in the north and in Britain. General Grant’s own appraisal of the emancipation of the slaves and the arming of slaves was that it was the heaviest blow yet given to the Confederacy. P.319 Reveille in Washington, Margaret Leech.

England had already abolished slavery in its empire in 1833. Despite the aristocratic fondness for the southern cause, the middle and lower classes would never support a war to protect slavery. The emancipation proclamation ended any possibility of English intervention in the war on behalf of the Confederacy.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: 16 Counties Defy Obama NDAA Indefinite Detention

Unread postby Cloud9 » Sat 08 Sep 2012, 08:59:54

I think it is a mistake to think in terms of Democrats and Republicans anymore. While both main parties would like to call themselves the party of Jefferson in that they took their names from his party, the truth is both parties are the left and right wings of the Federalist Party. Both clamor for government control and both have grown the size of government under their tenure. The Republicans have grown the government waving the flag of security and the Democrats have grown the government waving the flag of social justice. The bottom line is that now, the Government of the United States is the biggest and most powerful going concern in the U.S. and possibly the entire world. Nothing can compete with it.

The Federalist Party was a party of plutocrats. When they drew up the Constitution, they were confident that their wealth and power would enable them and their class to control the new government. That is why they saw no need for a bill of rights. Their class did not need these protections because their class controlled the government. It was the other less well franchised that feared the growth of the federal government and the centralization of power in the hands of the plutocrats. They were the ones that clamored for a check on the reach and power of this new government.

After the Constitutional Convention, the Constitution was published in its entirety in the nation’s newspapers. It was cussed and discussed in the boardrooms and bedrooms, tea houses and pubs of the nation. Two sides formed up. Those that favored the new system and those that were against it. Letters to the editors of those papers have been collected up and are called the Federalist and Antifederalist Papers. They are worth a read to get to the original thoughts of the founders.

The Federalists came to realize that they were never going to get the requisite nine states to ratify the Constitution unless they could gain the support of some of the Antifederalists. To do that, they reached a gentlemen’s agreement that if the Constitution was ratified, one of the first orders of the new congress would be to draft a bill of rights and amend the Constitution.

The Bill of Rights was the consideration given by the Federalists to the Antifederalists to get them to agree to our current government. Everyone who voted for NDAA violated his or her oath to protect the Constitution. The Constitution that was agreed upon that established this current government no longer exists.

The Federalists in their incessant efforts to increase their power created a myth early on that the Constitution was a living document that could be folded, spindled, wrapped and mutilated to support their ongoing agenda of centralized control. With the NDAA, the Federalists in both parties have successfully written the Bill of Rights out of the Constitution.

Consider this: When you have Alex Jones and the ACLU saying the same thing, it is probably true.

The nullification of the NDAA by these eleven counties is very similar to Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions that were sponsored by Jefferson and Madison. Many would argue that these resolutions were the first steps toward civil war.

The irony of all of this is that if there is ever going to be a civil war in this country it will not be over food or taxes or gasoline. People riot over food, taxes and gasoline. They wage wars over freedom. Ninety nine point nine percent of this country believes what they were taught in school. They believe they are protected under the Bill of Rights. We know that they are living under an illusion. When that illusion is shattered, there will be hell to pay. Obama signed into law a bill that gives some guy he does not know, some guy that he has never met, some guy who has not even been elected yet, the legal authority to disappear him and his family. While he was doing that, he did that for all of us. He did that for you Big Sis and all the uniformed minions that would seek to protect us. Under the NDAA, we all can be disappeared by future administrations.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: 16 Counties Defy Obama NDAA Indefinite Detention

Unread postby Pops » Sat 08 Sep 2012, 13:21:15

Good points cloud, except, just like Matt, you first say that R vs D thinking is wrong then proceed to blame the NDAA and Obama when the underlying law is the 2001 AUMF under bush.

http://www.lawfareblog.com/category/aum ... and-reach/
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: 16 Counties Defy Obama NDAA Indefinite Detention

Unread postby Cloud9 » Sat 08 Sep 2012, 16:03:16

Pops the bill was drawn up by John McCain. Of course the Republican Federalist worked hand and glove withe Democratic Federalist to draft and pass the NDAA. The Republicans were included in the part that mentioned every man and woman who signed the bill. There was no specific effort to single out your man. What these fools have created is very similar to to the laws passed by Hitler's crowd. They have given a tool to some future president that will allow him to kill his political opposition. When you stand back and look at it you must conclude that this bill is nuts.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: 16 Counties Defy Obama NDAA Indefinite Detention

Unread postby Pops » Mon 17 Sep 2012, 17:41:49

The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: 16 Counties Defy Obama NDAA Indefinite Detention

Unread postby Ferretlover » Fri 21 Sep 2012, 22:54:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mattduke', ' ') The next time I see a Obama sign adjacent to an anti war sign I'm going to lose my mind.

Well, don't do it here because I am NOT cleaning up the mess! :razz:
"Open the gates of hell!" ~Morgan Freeman's character in the movie, Olympus Has Fallen.
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland

Re: 16 Counties Defy Obama NDAA Indefinite Detention

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Fri 09 Nov 2012, 23:41:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', '
') :lol:

Here's a tip, if you're going to go to all the trouble of typing a long post, do yourself a favor and put the fake youtube video link at the end because folks will stop reading as soon as they see it.


Fair enough. I went an entire year not knowing that video was a fake. Then again, I've largely dropped off the internet anyhow, and there have been so many absurd decisions by this government that it's becoming less difficult to suspend disbelief than it is to question every new encroachment onto our liberties that happens, as we are daily bombarded with so much bad news that no one person can keep up with all of it. I appreciate your honesty.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnRM', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Everybody', 'O')bama is a tyrant. ... Congress passed the NDAA

If Congress passed the NDAA, then you can't really call the President a tyrant for it. It may be bad government and policy, but when a body of 535 federal legislators pass a law, it is NOT the act of a tyrant. Or, at very least, it is the act of 536 tyrants and you must admit that.


I do admit that. I am not pinning all of the blame on Obama or trying to insinuate that. Our congress is composed of authoritarians, in both parties. Any level headed centrist wouldn't support the NDAA provisions on the basis that they are extreme measures; they are the kind of measures tyrants in the past like Stalin or Hitler have implemented.

Obama still signed it. I understand he had a veto-proof majority in Congress, but at least he could have made a statement by delaying it.

The center between two authoritarian subsets is not the real center. Our politicians continue to to widen the gap between their views and that of the general population as a composite. This would be especially amusing if it weren't so tragic given that the American people seem more divided than ever before along partisan lines, when the platforms between the two parties have next to no difference.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') am not going to absolve the President of all guilt here, but I think that you all misrepresent exactly what happened. The President doesn't get to introduce bills, debate bills, or vote on them. He gets a veto. That veto is all or nothing. There are too many other things in that bill that the administration felt needed to pass. And beyond that, the President insisted that the bill be worded and regarded in a manner that does NOTHING to expand executive (detention) powers.


It is hard to accept his insistence as sincere or honest when his administration immediately appealed Katherine Forests' decision that the provision is unconstitutional. The fact is the constitution pretty much states that the provision is, right there in the Bill of Rights.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'J')eez, I get it people. You're not happy with the current Administration. You're not happy with the current government. We could do a lot worse! The problem, however, isn't with the government. The government is, but a subset of the People. It mimics our virtues and our vices. Unfortunately, for so many of us, the government does exactly what we want it to do. It does exactly what we ourselves do on these message boards.


Americans didn't want NAFTA or the WTO. They got them anyway. Americans didn't want the Iraq/Afghanistan wars to continue pretty much since 2006. They still continue to this day and the war on Afghanistan is continuing(in the case of Iraq, we use mercenaries paid for with our taxes, instead of soldiers, and still have a military presence there anyway). Americans didn't want a bailout of the Big 3 or the banks by overwhelming margins. They got it anyway. An overwhelming majority of Americans would like to know what they are eating, given that our food supply is filled with GMOs, prion-infected animals, and the like. Yet, the politicians and FDA insist, at the behest of their lobbyists, on the American public being denied the right to know what they are fed. An overwhelming majority of Americans support legalized medicinal marijuana and a majority even support outright legalization. A very tiny minority of congressional representatives support either.

In fact, there are hundreds of issues that this applies. Our government doesn't represent our will and it would be folly to pretend that it does. Congress has an approval rate hovering between 9-13% over the last year for a reason. Maybe it has something to do with our so-called "representatives" representing their lobbyists instead of us?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e debate endlessly and pointlessly about frivolous facts and details, going nowhere. We can't agree on anything.


Kind of like how they debated on the Patriot Act? Oh wait, they didn't; in fact, debate was largely forbidden.

Most of the hated legislation in the United States, such as the PATRIOT Act, the wars, NAFTA, and the like, are all bipartisan efforts where there is little or no debate at all, save for people like Dennis Kucinich or Ron Paul speaking up. There seems to be plenty of agreement among our "representatives" with regard to the direction they want this country to go into, even if Americans are more divided than ever before and overwhelmingly disapprove of the direction their nation is headed.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e make stupid choices in our own lives and value things that don't matter above the things that truly do. Its a circus; both in the Congress and on the streets.

Can't argue with that.

I understand that our "leaders" are human. What some here do not understand is that the amount of power these people have over our lives is excessive, and way too dangerous to the values that most Americans supposedly hold dear(liberty, autonomy, independence, prosperity, ect).

This has allowed us to be conquered by a greedy power elite. Some members here refuse to even acknowledge its existence, even though its existence is accepted as fact among sociologists, pyschologists, and others who study human behavior.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou cannot expect more from your government than We the People expect from ourselves.

This I agree with 100%.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')efore you make any attempt to fix the government, first fix yourself and your neighbor.

I've been working on that since adolescence. It has been a learning experience, to say the least. Not a day goes by where I don't learn something new.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n this country, the people get exactly what they want and deserve.

Kind of hard to believe that when disapproval of our so-called "representatives" is so high and they do the opposite of what the majority of U.S. citizens desire on scores of issues. That's not to say that the majority is always right, but only a fool would deny the outright bribery that occurs between corporations and our so-called representatives and its influence upon the decisions of our "representatives"

Volumes of books have been written on the subject of election fraud/tampering from the likes of Greg Palast, Cass Ingram, Allen Raymond, and literally tens of others. It's quite well documented, and you'll find it if you go looking for it.

Americans want and deserve something different than this.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '3'),140 counties and only 16 can muster the fortitude to object? There should be hundreds, if not thousands of objections, including entire states. "(..)But again, truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror."

I'm quite certain that a far greater percentage of actual Americans object, than counties. Call it an educated guess.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: 16 Counties Defy Obama NDAA Indefinite Detention

Unread postby Cloud9 » Sat 10 Nov 2012, 10:16:59

I have come to realize that we are tribal animals. We join tribes and we defend them right or wrong. We are Catholics or Protestants, Muslims or Christians, atheists or fundamentalists, Democrats or Republicans. This is a consequence of the simple fact that in moments of confusion, we are hard wire to default back to the group. We keep on voting the bastards in because they are our bastards. It is an irrational survival instinct that allows the, us versus them, paradigm to deprive us of our free will and relegate us to the position of team players. We follow those we would otherwise not follow because they are the leaders of our team.

I voted for Romney even though I despise him. I should have written in Ron Paul but given the choice of a Democrat versus a Republican, I defaulted to the position of team player. I am no better than the rest of you. I chose the team over principle. I won’t do that next time. I’m done with the team.

Having said that, all I can do is stand in amazement at the adroit maneuverings of the Chicago Machine that now runs the country. Think about it. They took those country bumpkins from Arkansas, wrapped them up in a pretty little box and left them in the parking lot. Seriously, when you have out slicked Slick Willie, you have elevated slime to a whole new level of viscosity.

Unless we find the will to break up the political class that runs Washington, we will continue down this course and the collapse will be managed by Marxists. The only other choice the politicos offered us was to have the collapse managed by fascists who were themselves run by the Banks. Either way it was going to be a totalitarian regime. That is why the Patriot Act and the NDAA were supported by both groups. Same tools, different team.

Obama is now in the position to fulfill the wishes of his acolytes and serve as America’s fourth great dictator. As individuals, all we can do is look to ourselves as the gangsta s**t Chris Rock promised us unfolds. Good luck.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucdT7949LFc
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron