Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Meet Cannibalistic Capitalism: Globalization's Evil Twin

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Meet Cannibalistic Capitalism: Globalization's Evil Twin

Postby Pops » Sun 05 Aug 2012, 11:25:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ralfy', 'I')n order to stay profitable through innovation, one innovates to cut costs, increase productivity, or both. The first leads to more profits without selling more, but those profits have to go somewhere. If they are invested in other companies, then those companies have to sell more in order to produce greater returns on investment. If they are re-invested in the business, then more will have to be produced, which is the second result of innovation.

OK, so we agree that a company can shrink, make a profit and still be capitalistic.

There is no rule that profits must be large enough to be reinvested or accumulated, merely that there be a profit. Capitalists are consumers too, simply making a living from capital in a shrinking economy would be a success.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Meet Cannibalistic Capitalism: Globalization's Evil Twin

Postby davep » Sun 05 Aug 2012, 12:00:50

Capitalism itself does not require growth, but our fractional reserve economic system requires debt that is paid for by continual growth. Our economic system would eventually collapse without the growth required to pay the debt.
What we think, we become.
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: Meet Cannibalistic Capitalism: Globalization's Evil Twin

Postby ralfy » Sun 05 Aug 2012, 12:19:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ralfy', 'I')n short, the end result is always increased productivity, which boils down to more sales in return for more profits. That is essentially what "profit" involves in the definition that you gave.

Not true.
productivity = production / time
Nowhere it says that you need to keep 'time' constant.


Time is constant in this case because you compare production between time periods. For example, you compare the number of units produced at the end of this fiscal year compared to what was produced last year. That's how you see if you are more productive.

In contrast, it's illogical to compare productivity during the last six months with the productivity the last six hundred months.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Capitalism has nothing to do with debt, nor growth, nor financel market, nor stocks.
It simply means that you can own your equipment and you can sell your product for whatever price you choose.


Capitalism has everything to do with debt, growth, the financial market, and stocks. The presence of all four in the present global capitalist system is painfully obvious proof of that.

The last statement that you give is only part of the definition, and the second part of your statement is completely wrong. If you sell your product at a price lower than your cost, then you lose. You will have to sell it at a price that is the same as your cost or higher. If you sell it at a price that is the same as your cost, then you make no profits, and with that, no capital to invest in any way. You need to sell it at a higher price, and that's where you make a profit. What happens to that profit? Read my previous messages.
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland

Re: Meet Cannibalistic Capitalism: Globalization's Evil Twin

Postby ralfy » Sun 05 Aug 2012, 12:34:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ralfy', 'I')n order to stay profitable through innovation, one innovates to cut costs, increase productivity, or both. The first leads to more profits without selling more, but those profits have to go somewhere. If they are invested in other companies, then those companies have to sell more in order to produce greater returns on investment. If they are re-invested in the business, then more will have to be produced, which is the second result of innovation.

OK, so we agree that a company can shrink, make a profit and still be capitalistic.


There is nothing in my points that refer to a company shrinking. In all three cases, production remains the same or increases.

It is, of course, possible for a company to decrease production, still make a profit, and "be capitalistic." That is, decrease production significantly and sell un-utilized aspects of operations, then use all of the money saved and invest it in another company. That is what various U.S. companies had in fact been doing the last few decades, with manufacturing outsourced to other countries. The catch is that production actually didn't decrease but was simply outsourced. That's why the number of cars produced and sold worldwide has been in an upward trend for almost a century, together with many other goods and services.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
There is no rule that profits must be large enough to be reinvested or accumulated, merely that there be a profit. Capitalists are consumers too, simply making a living from capital in a shrinking economy would be a success.


Obviously, there is no rule, except that of competition. In short, you are free not to make more profits or to invest it, and your competitor is free to do the opposite.

Now, in a shrinking economy, you and your competitor will make less profits each time (and even losses), but this does not help your argument at all, as you pointed out at the beginning that you expect to see at least the same profits given this condition.

I would like to point out that nothing you have said so far contradicts anything that I've said. The fact that one will end up "simply making a living" does not make it logical to call a "shrinking economy" capitalist. In fact, much of human history essentially involved "simply making a living." Making more, which means profiting? That's capitalism.

Finally, I'd like to point out that in case anyone argues that as long as one is paid for his labor then he is profiting, that payment for his labor is actually part of the cost of what he sold. A profit is the difference between the price and the cost of the good, which includes the materials used to make the good plus the labor cost.
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland
Top

Re: Meet Cannibalistic Capitalism: Globalization's Evil Twin

Postby dsula » Sun 05 Aug 2012, 14:49:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ralfy', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ralfy', 'I')n short, the end result is always increased productivity, which boils down to more sales in return for more profits. That is essentially what "profit" involves in the definition that you gave.

Not true.
productivity = production / time
Nowhere it says that you need to keep 'time' constant.


Time is constant in this case because you compare production between time periods. For example, you compare the number of units produced at the end of this fiscal year compared to what was produced last year. That's how you see if you are more productive.

You measure time, you measure production and you calculate productivity. If you make 1000 screws per day you don't need to wait 1 year to compare your productivity.

Real life example: I just bought a new machine for my business which is 8 times more productive. So what used to take me 8 hours to accomplish, I can now do in 1 hour. And guess what the best part of it is? I now have 7 hours of spare time per day which I used to have to work. I chose not to grow, but use the gained productivity to get more free time.
Capitalism does not require growth.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Capitalism has everything to do with debt, growth, the financial market, and stocks. The presence of all four in the present global capitalist system is painfully obvious proof of that.

Current capitalism grew into the available financial system, which is a debt driven system. Capitalsim can also oerate with completely different financial system. E.g one where it is forbidden by penalty of death to borrow any money. Capitalism has nothing to do with debt.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
') If you sell your product at a price lower than your cost, then you lose.

It's my freedom to charge as much as I want. It is not mandated by any law. That's the point. If I enjoy losses I can give away my product for free or even pay you to buy it. Such is the freedom of capitalism.
User avatar
dsula
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 982
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Meet Cannibalistic Capitalism: Globalization's Evil Twin

Postby Lore » Sun 05 Aug 2012, 17:44:50

I believe the greater question should be, why should capitalism continue in a post-peak world? No better time to start over and end the catalyst for the very problem that got you into your current mess in the first place.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: Meet Cannibalistic Capitalism: Globalization's Evil Twin

Postby dsula » Sun 05 Aug 2012, 18:10:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', 'I') believe the greater question should be, why should capitalism continue in a post-peak world? .

Same reason why democracy should continue. Both democracy and capitalism are bad, but they are the best there is.
User avatar
dsula
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 982
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Meet Cannibalistic Capitalism: Globalization's Evil Twin

Postby Lore » Sun 05 Aug 2012, 18:16:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', 'I') believe the greater question should be, why should capitalism continue in a post-peak world? .

Same reason why democracy should continue. Both democracy and capitalism are bad, but they are the best there is.


Exactly, which is a perfect reason for making the shift to the better alternatives. You don't get many opportunities for a do-over.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet
Top

Re: Meet Cannibalistic Capitalism: Globalization's Evil Twin

Postby dsula » Sun 05 Aug 2012, 18:22:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', 'I') believe the greater question should be, why should capitalism continue in a post-peak world? .

Same reason why democracy should continue. Both democracy and capitalism are bad, but they are the best there is.


Exactly, which is a perfect reason for making the shift to the better alternatives. You don't get many opportunities for a do-over.

What alternatives? Kingdom? With you as king? Or a social paradise, where no matter how much or how little you work you always get one bowl of rice + beans per day?
User avatar
dsula
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 982
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Meet Cannibalistic Capitalism: Globalization's Evil Twin

Postby Lore » Sun 05 Aug 2012, 18:38:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', 'I') believe the greater question should be, why should capitalism continue in a post-peak world? .

Same reason why democracy should continue. Both democracy and capitalism are bad, but they are the best there is.


Exactly, which is a perfect reason for making the shift to the better alternatives. You don't get many opportunities for a do-over.

What alternatives? Kingdom? With you as king? Or a social paradise, where no matter how much or how little you work you always get one bowl of rice + beans per day?


I feel sorry for your confusion, but there are certainly better ways to exist upon the earth rather then profit from someone else living on it. There are many societies and cultures that have lived by far nobler codes in which the betterment of mind, body and spirit were exalted far above those seeking physical wealth.

There is a big difference between what you need and what you want. In a post peak world, maybe the power should go to those who are esteemed for what they give rather then what they take?
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet
Top

Re: Meet Cannibalistic Capitalism: Globalization's Evil Twin

Postby Quinny » Sun 05 Aug 2012, 19:25:58

Sorry dsula but you've got it wrong. The current financial system grew out of Capitalism!
Last edited by Ferretlover on Tue 14 Aug 2012, 21:48:44, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Deleted excessive requoting.
Live, Love, Learn, Leave Legacy.....oh and have a Laugh while you're doing it!
User avatar
Quinny
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Meet Cannibalistic Capitalism: Globalization's Evil Twin

Postby Pops » Sun 05 Aug 2012, 22:02:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ralfy', 'N')ow, in a shrinking economy, you and your competitor will make less profits each time (and even losses), but this does not help your argument at all, as you pointed out at the beginning that you expect to see at least the same profits given this condition.


Heh, no wonder I couldn't figure out what you were going on about.
I'm not arguing profits would be the same, only that there can be profit (so capitalism) without growth. I can't see where I wrote that, point it out to me if you would, please.

Unless it was this:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'T')he economy can be shrinking and still a better idea can equal profit at the expense of lesser idea


IOW: ideas equal profit.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Meet Cannibalistic Capitalism: Globalization's Evil Twin

Postby ralfy » Mon 06 Aug 2012, 01:26:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', 'Y')ou measure time, you measure production and you calculate productivity. If you make 1000 screws per day you don't need to wait 1 year to compare your productivity.

The issue isn't calculating productivity. It's comparing productivity levels across different time periods.

You don't have to "wait 1 year to compare your productivity." You can do it in 24-hour increments if you like. The point is that you compare one 24-hour period with another 24-hour period. The time period is constant. You don't compare productivity for one day with the same for one year.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')eal life example: I just bought a new machine for my business which is 8 times more productive. So what used to take me 8 hours to accomplish, I can now do in 1 hour. And guess what the best part of it is? I now have 7 hours of spare time per day which I used to have to work. I chose not to grow, but use the gained productivity to get more free time.Capitalism does not require growth.

Yes, and your competitor sees the glass as half-empty. Do you understand? The machine gives you seven hours of free time. The same machine gives your competitor eight times more productivity.

Welcome to free market capitalism.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')urrent capitalism grew into the available financial system, which is a debt driven system. Capitalsim can also oerate with completely different financial system. E.g one where it is forbidden by penalty of death to borrow any money. Capitalism has nothing to do with debt.

The last sentence of your paragraph contradicts the first sentence. The first sentence proves my point.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t's my freedom to charge as much as I want. It is not mandated by any law. That's the point. If I enjoy losses I can give away my product for free or even pay you to buy it. Such is the freedom of capitalism.

Exactly! And when you sell at a loss or at lower profits, you do so to obtain greater market share. And when you look for more markets to sell, you increase production.

Everything that you've said so far supports the argument that capitalism requires growth.
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland
Top

Re: Meet Cannibalistic Capitalism: Globalization's Evil Twin

Postby ralfy » Mon 06 Aug 2012, 01:33:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Quinny', 'S')orry dsula but you've got it wrong. The current financial system grew out of Capitalism!



Good point! From what I remember, one started with guilds and rudimentary forms of manufacturing coupled with banks to kept merchants' gold. With the use of paper notes, banks could lend at interest backed by what was in the vault (or more, as no one audited them) while depositors also preferred to use paper notes as it was too dangerous or cumbersome to bring gold around. The need for credit became even more prominent as resources from newly discovered regions necessitated financing extraction of such. From there, it was a matter of time before we had even better technology to extract more resources and produce more goods, the formation of more complex systems such as corporations and various financial instruments to support them, and ever-sophisticated goods which required more resources, more production, more complex systems, and more financing.

Again, all of these factors point to growth on different levels. Martenson has some interesting points about that in a recent lecture, and shows how all of them are connected to peak oil.
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland
Top

Re: Meet Cannibalistic Capitalism: Globalization's Evil Twin

Postby ralfy » Mon 06 Aug 2012, 02:16:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'H')eh, no wonder I couldn't figure out what you were going on about.
I'm not arguing profits would be the same, only that there can be profit (so capitalism) without growth. I can't see where I wrote that, point it out to me if you would, please.

It's in this post: Topic 66150

especially the second paragraph, as well as the third, which implies that as we "transition to something else," we can maintain or even increase current production and consumption levels. The example is implicit in the first paragraph: we replace an F-150 with a Prius supposedly because the second uses fewer resources.

And yet part of the current capitalist system doesn't simply involve switching from an F-150 to a Prius, it's selling more Prius units together with everything else. And the third paragraph doesn't help if what we transition to won't provide enough petrochemicals to produce more cars.

Take a look at the points raised in this article: "Alternative energies won’t replace oil, gas, and coal anytime soon."
Slate

During the past decade, global energy consumption rose 27 pct or the equivalent of six Saudi Arabias. And that level of energy consumption was enough to power up present infrastructure, with more than 60 pct of human beings still earning only around two dollars a day.

In order to ensure that everyone today who has something like an F-150 will be able to switch to a Prius, and in addition to that those who still don't have an F-150 to have a Prius or equivalent (as that is the nature of market competition: you sell more to meet demand) we will very likely need more than just six Saudi Arabias. Will "something else" allow for that, or do we end up with ox carts? But if we do end up with ox carts, then it is obvious that we won't be able to maintain current production or profits. In fact, it may even reach a point when we run out of ox carts.

Finally, it's helpful to bring up ideas like innovation (more on that below, but for now, the transition to ox carts is probably not a good example of that), but isn't the use of oil one example? If so, then why do we face the threat of peak oil? Is it because in a global capitalist system that involves competition, non-utilized resources, like profits that are not invested, are seen as opportunity costs? Again, we see this in Dsula's example: if I have a machine that makes me eight times more productive, then that will free up seven-eighths of my working time for more leisure. But a competitor might see things otherwise: the same machine will allow him to produce eight times more, and with a lower cost per unit he can sell at a cheaper price and thus take over more market share. At some point, more people will not buy from me because my products are priced higher.

Do you see the same taking place for oil, for profits made, etc? Does this explain why oil production and consumption, money supply, etc., have been rising considerably worldwide for decades? Do those who worked in businesses see similar phenomenon regarding meeting quotas, cutting production costs by x pct, etc?

It's also best to be clear about what we mean by having profit without growth. If that means a few or one person profiting at the expense of others, then we can argue that there can be profit without growth. But if by that statement we mean most wanting to profit, then we cannot say the same, as a shrinking economy will mean less profits for more people, until there is very little left.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'U')nless it was this:$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'T')he economy can be shrinking and still a better idea can equal profit at the expense of lesser idea
IOW: ideas equal profit.

This is not what I was referring to, but it's also something worth discussing.

That last statement, in fact, very much describes the "new age" views of intellectual capital and similar raised during the 1990s, when people were so excited over using information as power or as a means to make money (another abstraction). That is what allowed countries like the U.S. to outsource manufacturing and to move to making money by...making money, especially by selling information or virtual products.

Notice, though, that the phenomenon promoted the very same principles that underlie manufacturing: increased production and consumption of goods. In this case, banks had to get more borrowers, social networking companies more sign-ups, etc. More important, the underlying physical products still prevailed, with cars, electronic gadgets, etc., purchased through loans or advertised on-line. And as more competitors joined in the fray, getting more clients became more difficult, even as one expanded markets to other countries.

Ultimately, the same phenomenon points to growth: more computers, etc., have to be produced and sold to make those ideas profitable, more money has to exchange hands, more trading has to take place, whether of physical or virtual products, etc.

Thus, ideas equal profits only if there is a means to capitalize on those ideas, and that ultimately involves increasing production at a lower cost per unit. If the point refers to saving resources, then that doesn't apply to capitalist systems, as non-utilized resources need to be exploited for profit, especially given competition.

You can also just concentrate on the idea of profit. In order to profit, you must be paid more than the cost of a good or service sold. But what do you do with the profit? If you buy something with it or invest in another business or in your own, then what you buy or invest in leads to increased production. That's capitalism, and it obviously involves growth.

If by "profit," though, you simply mean saving resources so that they can be used for future basic needs, and assuming that no one else will have the bright idea of using resources saved to do otherwise, then I wouldn't see such a situation as capitalist.
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland
Top

Re: Meet Cannibalistic Capitalism: Globalization's Evil Twin

Postby Pops » Mon 06 Aug 2012, 08:38:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ralfy', 'e')specially the second paragraph, as well as the third, which implies that as we "transition to something else," we can maintain or even increase current production and consumption levels.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'T')he economy can be shrinking and still a better idea can equal profit at the expense of lesser idea

shrinking
Verb: Become or make smaller in size or amount; contract or cause to contract.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Meet Cannibalistic Capitalism: Globalization's Evil Twin

Postby dsula » Mon 06 Aug 2012, 09:17:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Quinny', 'S')orry dsula but you've got it wrong. The current financial system grew out of Capitalism!

It doesn't matter what grew out of what. Capitalism has nothing to do with type of financial system in place.
User avatar
dsula
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 982
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Meet Cannibalistic Capitalism: Globalization's Evil Twin

Postby Pops » Mon 06 Aug 2012, 10:04:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ralfy', 'I')t's also best to be clear about what we mean by having profit without growth. If that means a few or one person profiting at the expense of others, then we can argue that there can be profit without growth.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('In the same paragraph as quoted in his last post, the next sentence in fact, Pops', 'T')hat is what happens in any mature market, competition rewards with market share at the expense of competitors instead of increased market size.


You sure use a lot of keystrokes to agree. :-D
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Meet Cannibalistic Capitalism: Globalization's Evil Twin

Postby The Practician » Mon 06 Aug 2012, 13:03:44

I think there is a bit of confusion as to what capitalism, at least the capitalism we know and love, really is. It should be obvious by now that whatever you want to call our global economic system, it is a system designed for MAXIMIZING WASTE, not ACCUMULATING CAPITAL. Capitalism is a lie. It destroys capital and funnels the "profits" of this waste (debts of others) to the elites.

If we are going to call the system we have capitalism, I am afraid we will have to come up a different name for a system that actually does what capitalism claims it does.
The Practician
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 270
Joined: Wed 20 Jul 2011, 22:08:02

Re: Meet Cannibalistic Capitalism: Globalization's Evil Twin

Postby SeaGypsy » Mon 06 Aug 2012, 14:36:36

"What we have here; is a faylyure too Commuunicayte"

There are very few real 'Capitalists'; many wanna be's. The Ponzi belief system is that we can all be rich if we scam hard enough. Basic failure in logic, pyramid scam. Without an infinite base to draw on there can be no 'infinite growth'. Thus we have actually neither. The system is designed to allow most people the perception that their life is getting better. Once you have maxed out your 'wastefulness'; your usefulness to the system is limited. Especially now with globalism, there is a massive supply of eager worker ants ready to work like our western ancestors did 100 years ago for a slice of the pie. Not much need for the first world middle class anymore, with all our high falutin expectations. Aspiration is cool, because the aspirant will gamble whatever wealth they have, or think they have, for a shot at joining the 'capitalists'.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron