by ralfy » Wed 01 Aug 2012, 04:31:08
Much of Metro Manila is terrible, but several parts resemble places like the outskirts of Sydney or even Brisbane, and some parts even look like old neighborhoods in Sydney or even Blacktown.
One reason why some of these areas are well-maintained is because of the high cost of living, something that most locals cannot afford. That is why even that which is meaner they consider above-average. For those who consider what is even better as ordinary, it has to do with their middle class background.
As I pointed out elsewhere, only around 15 pct of human beings earn between 10 and 20 dollars a day or more, and even when their income is adjusted to the cost of living in their area, they earn many times more than the average human being. Meanwhile, more than 60 pct of human beings earn only around 2 dollars day, but that's gone up from a dollar around three decades ago. Finally, the same 15 pct of human beings are responsible for more than 60 pct of personal consumption. This can be seen in very high ecological footprints for areas like the U.S., Australia, and Canada: around eight times more than that of the Philippines. It's no wonder then that even the most sophisticated parts of Metro Manila are not as good as that of other cities.
The catch is that this type of consumption and ecological footprint requires incredible amounts of credit and resources. For example, Australia has one of the highest levels of personal debt in the world, and the U.S. overall. The U.S. requires significant amounts of resources, including oil, to maintain a middle class lifestyle, such as up to a quarter of world oil production for less than 5 pct of the world's population.
In addition, a growing global middle class is appearing, leading to more resource consumption. That is because in a global capitalist economy, those who are part of the middle class can only maintain their lifestyle by selling more goods and services to those who are not. That is why even places like Metro Manila, if not the outskirts, are now radically different from what they were in the past, with more services that were not available in the past. The same goes for many other cities in the country, as well as other countries in the region.
How is this connected to the OP's point? Generally all forum members are part of the middle class, i.e., the top 15 pct of the world's population. They do not have to think about what the other 85 pct have to go through but just feel lucky that they won't be part of the same. And yet their own income and wealth are ultimately dependent on ensuring that the same 85 pct will join them (in short, laugh at those who are poorer, but find ways to make sure that they will no longer be poor, as one needs more customers). More important, the aspirations backing such views ironically involve the opposite of acknowledging peak oil.
In which case, insofar as one feels lucky not to have to "crawl into a hole" psychologically or literally, it may come to that. And when that happens, it won't be a case of more of the 85 pct joining the 15 pct but the other way round.