by Sixstrings » Wed 27 Jun 2012, 15:33:03
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ralfy', '&')quot;Jimmy Carter, hide your head in shame"
Thanks for posting that, because the Carter presidency was before my time but I was wondering here in this thread if Carter really was the saintly man of peace that we think. He was president, after all. That means approving CIA missions and all sorts of things.
From your article:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ew information, coming out of events related to the recent invasion of Iraq suggest that Saddam did not act alone. It was kicked off on August 10th 1980, when Saddam Hussein was invited to his first state visit to Saudi Arabia, the first for any Iraqi President. This was a historic meeting.
Prince Fahd had been asked to convey a private message of support for an invasion of Iran by Saddam from President Carter.
Think back to the summer of 1980. Jimmy Carter was running for reelection as President. The Mullah's in Iran had turned against him holding Americans hostages at the US embassy in Tehran (even though he had brought about the Shah's demise). Carter had also been secretly briefed about private meetings between the Mullah's and the Republican Party... to hold the hostages until after November elections... to humiliate him and engineer his loss. The Mullah's had betrayed him.
With his back against the wall, Carter pushed for a quick decisive invasion of Iran by Saddam Hussein... hoping for a quick demise of the newly installed Islamic regime. The Saudi's and other allied Arab states had been asked to assist. And assist they did...And so, on September 22nd, 1980, twelve fully equipped Iraqi Army divisions crossed into Iran, with simultaneous fighter-bomber attacks of Iran's major airports. Iraqi troops immediately occupied ten important Iranian cities: Khoramshahr, Susangerd, Bostan, Mehran, Dehloran, Hoveizieh, Naft Shahr, Qasr Shirin, Sumar and Musian. And began targeting Abadan, Ahwaz, Dezful, Shushtar, Andimeshk, Isalmabad-e-qarb and Gilan-e-qarb with hundreds of surface-to-surface missiles. They also started targeting oil tankers servicing Iranian ports, Iranian Oil platforms, and Iranian Islands in the Persian Gulf - with Exocet missiles and Super Etendard Aircraft supplied by France. Iraq's goal was to completely shut down Iran's oil exports, and grab land.
Iran was very vulnerable. The Carter administration had placed Iran under a worldwide arms embargo, which in effect prevented Iran from obtaining weapons and spare parts necessary to defend it. Also, Iran's foreign currency assets were frozen. And most senior Iranian airforce and army officers had either been executed or imprisoned or had simply fled Iran. Iran was basically defenseless. Carter was now going for Iran's throat using Saddam's hands.
Carter's miscalculation cost him his presidency and cost millions of Iranians and Iraqi's their deaths. You could even say that Iraqi's who died after the war (during Saddam's brutal presidency, and two subsequent wars) as well as coalition soldiers who are dying now are deaths that in many ways can be linked to this war and Carter's fateful decision to invade Iran. (By the way, no one had the balls to mention any of this when he won the Nobel peace prize.)
I already tangentially knew that the US backed Iraq in its wars with Iran but didn't know the details of how that started, was it Reagan or is this article true and it in fact began with Carter.
If this is true, is Carter still a saintly man of peace? What's the difference, keeping the American troops at home and using proxies instead? It's still warring, and a million civilians died, and Iraq used horrific chemical weapons with American approval.
Also, is this article right, it says it was Carter's fault the shah fell.