Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Jimmy Carter Thread (merged)

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: Jimmy Carter Speaks Out Against US Government

Postby Pops » Tue 26 Jun 2012, 18:13:36

surprised your trolling and ad homs don't spark intelligent conversation?

Maybe you should post somewhere your logic is appreciated.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Jimmy Carter Speaks Out Against US Government

Postby Shaved Monkey » Tue 26 Jun 2012, 19:27:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FarQ3', 'I') thought that US intelligence did a cleaner job of weeding out these terrorist types in the past and disposing of them, but maybe I 'm wrong.

They spent most of their time funding,arming and training them and the US's unquestioning support of Zionism is for baiting and recruiting more.
Its a self feeding system
Cause a problem,bomb the problem, steal the resources.
Rinse and repeat.
If there wasn't a problem created, it would look like theft and not a humanitarian mission.
Ready to turn Zombies into WWOOFers
User avatar
Shaved Monkey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2578
Joined: Wed 30 Mar 2011, 01:43:28

Re: Jimmy Carter Speaks Out Against US Government

Postby careinke » Tue 26 Jun 2012, 20:25:14

I think Jimmy Carter is the best EX president ever. While in office, not so much.
Cliff (Start a rEVOLution, grow a garden)
User avatar
careinke
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 5047
Joined: Mon 01 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Jimmy Carter Speaks Out Against US Government

Postby Lore » Tue 26 Jun 2012, 20:31:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('careinke', 'I') think Jimmy Carter is the best EX president ever. While in office, not so much.


I can agree with that, so everyone else, layoff the old man!
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: Jimmy Carter Speaks Out Against US Government

Postby Fishman » Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:06:31

Pops, I've posted direct quotes from president Carter that directly contradict himself. He called those that disagree with the policies of a president racist, then does the same thing himself. YOU OFFERED NOTHING intellectually other than name calling, oh wait, isn't that one of the definitions of a troll?
Obama, the FUBAR presidency gets scraped off the boot
User avatar
Fishman
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Carolina de Norte

Re: Jimmy Carter Speaks Out Against US Government

Postby ColossalContrarian » Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:29:58

The problem with Jimmy is that he actually cared about the ME and warned people many years ago about the problem of CIA alchemy and pranks in the vicinity.

What I find hilarious a is how Sixstrings and Fishman argue back and forth (in numerous threads) believing their ideals are better than the others yet at the same time they have the same goal in the end and that is to royally screw over future generations (aka their grandchildren).

Some how Sixstrings finds ways to put down Carter and defend Clinton and Obama while Fishman defends Regan, Bush, and Bush, all the while the beliefs and warnings of Jimmy Carter come true (a few decades later). So Sixstrings and Fishman are in agreement that Jimmy was a terrible president if not the worst ever, and the bozo's who've been in office, right or left, where still better than Carter. Next I imagine you two will continue to argue and put down future generations while in the end you both really just want to screw them over. This is the type of nonsense the youth need to understand. You both might disagree about a lot but when it comes to screwing future generations you're on the same team.
ColossalContrarian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1374
Joined: Tue 20 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Jimmy Carter Speaks Out Against US Government

Postby Fishman » Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:38:06

Colos, your knowledge of history fails even the simplest test
"The Carter Doctrine was a policy proclaimed by President of the United States Jimmy Carter in his State of the Union Address on January 23, 1980, which stated that the United States would use military force if necessary to defend its national interests in the Persian Gulf region"

Hows that for "he actually cared about the ME"?
Obama, the FUBAR presidency gets scraped off the boot
User avatar
Fishman
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Carolina de Norte

Re: Jimmy Carter Speaks Out Against US Government

Postby SILENTTODD » Wed 27 Jun 2012, 05:03:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dissident', 'T')here was something else that was declared at the end of WWII: the Nuremberg Convention. Starting wars is the ultimate war crime. The US wants to start wars everywhere and all the time. It uses transparent propaganda about human rights as some sort of fig leaf justification. In Syria it funds and arms militants to start an insurrection and when there are the inevitable civilian deaths and atrocities it cries that it is justified in its policy. This is right up there with the German staged attacks along the Polish border in 1939.

We have crying in the western media about atrocities on civilians but when hundreds are killed by NATO bombs, it's "sh*t happens". There were no atrocities in Syria in 2010 and before the militant FSA started its armed quest for power. Nobody who is honest would paint the FSA as some vast improvement over Assad's regime. These are jihadi fanatics who want a Sharia paradise. Assad's regime is at least secular. BTW, where is the crying in the west about the Egyptian junta trying to run the show regardless of elections. Why isn't Hillary Clinton foaming at the mouth about "unacceptable behaviour"?

Carter doesn't even attack the US foreign policy on it is main problem, violation of international law. He has to resort to the whishy-washy "human rights" tropes. Wars kill people and that is the ultimate violation of human rights.


Absolutely Dissident. Rudolf Hess was held in Spandau prison for 41 years, not for crimes of the holocaust which he had nothing to do with, but for crimes against peace (planning and preparation of aggressive war).
Skeptical scrutiny in both Science and Religion is the means by which deep thoughts are winnowed from deep nonsense-Carl Sagan
User avatar
SILENTTODD
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 928
Joined: Sat 06 May 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Corona, CA

Re: Jimmy Carter Speaks Out Against US Government

Postby Fishman » Wed 27 Jun 2012, 06:37:19

"Rudolf Hess was held in Spandau prison for 41 years, not for crimes of the holocaust which he had nothing to do with, but for crimes against peace (planning and preparation of aggressive war)."

Wow, looks like we will have to keep the Guantanamo prison open for a long time.

There were atrocities in Syria in 2010 and have been seen the Assad family has ruled Syria. Again, pick up a history book.
Obama, the FUBAR presidency gets scraped off the boot
User avatar
Fishman
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Carolina de Norte

Re: Jimmy Carter Speaks Out Against US Government

Postby ralfy » Wed 27 Jun 2012, 10:46:47

"Jimmy Carter, hide your head in shame"

http://www.iranian.com/Opinion/2004/Sep ... index.html
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland

Re: Jimmy Carter Speaks Out Against US Government

Postby Plantagenet » Wed 27 Jun 2012, 13:40:13

If its legal under international law for the US to fly drones over Pakistan and blow Afghanis up, then....

Why shouldn't China fly drones over India and blow up Tibetan dissidents?

Is it legal for Spain to fly drones over France and blow up Basque rebels?

Is it legal for Britain should fly drones over Boston to blow up IRA members?

Can Syria fly drones over Turkey to blow up Syrian refugees and fighters?

ImageWhat is a drone for the goose is also a drone for the gander.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Jimmy Carter Speaks Out Against US Government

Postby EnergyUnlimited » Wed 27 Jun 2012, 14:44:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Fishman', '
')Wow, looks like we will have to keep the Guantanamo prison open for a long time.

Are you suggesting that several American presidents and other high officials are going to be kept there?

Btw,
I wonder why Henry Kissinger is reluctant to visit Europe...
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Jimmy Carter Speaks Out Against US Government

Postby Sixstrings » Wed 27 Jun 2012, 15:17:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'I')f its legal under international law for the US to fly drones over Pakistan and blow Afghanis up, then....

Why shouldn't China fly drones over India and blow up Tibetan dissidents?


If Romney wins and keeps the same drone policy as Bush-Obama, will you still hold the same opinion or conveniently forget about it?

Cripes, I'm more Republican on this issue than you are Plant. At least I'm saying "it's complicated." What's your take? You do realize the drone strikes have decimated AQ. They're getting all the leaders.

As for your particular argument, far as I know we have *approval* from the the countries where we're doing drone ops in. IF they pull that approval, then the US will stop. Otherwise drone strikes are done in failed states where there's no government to get permission from.

We didn't get prior approval for the OBL mission, but turns out he was "hiding" in a neighborhood full of retired Pakistani military with a Pakistani military base a few blocks over. :roll:

Anyhow Pakistan is sovereign, it's up to them Plant, they can throw us out if they choose to, they can say no more drones if they want, they can be fully sovereign and take care of AQ and taliban on their own, or they can keep playing this middleman game forever if that's what they want (apparently so, they think it's to their advantage so okie dokie).
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Jimmy Carter Speaks Out Against US Government

Postby Sixstrings » Wed 27 Jun 2012, 15:33:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ralfy', '&')quot;Jimmy Carter, hide your head in shame"


Thanks for posting that, because the Carter presidency was before my time but I was wondering here in this thread if Carter really was the saintly man of peace that we think. He was president, after all. That means approving CIA missions and all sorts of things.

From your article:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ew information, coming out of events related to the recent invasion of Iraq suggest that Saddam did not act alone. It was kicked off on August 10th 1980, when Saddam Hussein was invited to his first state visit to Saudi Arabia, the first for any Iraqi President. This was a historic meeting. Prince Fahd had been asked to convey a private message of support for an invasion of Iran by Saddam from President Carter.

Think back to the summer of 1980. Jimmy Carter was running for reelection as President. The Mullah's in Iran had turned against him holding Americans hostages at the US embassy in Tehran (even though he had brought about the Shah's demise). Carter had also been secretly briefed about private meetings between the Mullah's and the Republican Party... to hold the hostages until after November elections... to humiliate him and engineer his loss. The Mullah's had betrayed him.

With his back against the wall, Carter pushed for a quick decisive invasion of Iran by Saddam Hussein... hoping for a quick demise of the newly installed Islamic regime. The Saudi's and other allied Arab states had been asked to assist. And assist they did...


And so, on September 22nd, 1980, twelve fully equipped Iraqi Army divisions crossed into Iran, with simultaneous fighter-bomber attacks of Iran's major airports. Iraqi troops immediately occupied ten important Iranian cities: Khoramshahr, Susangerd, Bostan, Mehran, Dehloran, Hoveizieh, Naft Shahr, Qasr Shirin, Sumar and Musian. And began targeting Abadan, Ahwaz, Dezful, Shushtar, Andimeshk, Isalmabad-e-qarb and Gilan-e-qarb with hundreds of surface-to-surface missiles. They also started targeting oil tankers servicing Iranian ports, Iranian Oil platforms, and Iranian Islands in the Persian Gulf - with Exocet missiles and Super Etendard Aircraft supplied by France. Iraq's goal was to completely shut down Iran's oil exports, and grab land.

Iran was very vulnerable. The Carter administration had placed Iran under a worldwide arms embargo, which in effect prevented Iran from obtaining weapons and spare parts necessary to defend it. Also, Iran's foreign currency assets were frozen. And most senior Iranian airforce and army officers had either been executed or imprisoned or had simply fled Iran. Iran was basically defenseless. Carter was now going for Iran's throat using Saddam's hands.

Carter's miscalculation cost him his presidency and cost millions of Iranians and Iraqi's their deaths. You could even say that Iraqi's who died after the war (during Saddam's brutal presidency, and two subsequent wars) as well as coalition soldiers who are dying now are deaths that in many ways can be linked to this war and Carter's fateful decision to invade Iran. (By the way, no one had the balls to mention any of this when he won the Nobel peace prize.)


I already tangentially knew that the US backed Iraq in its wars with Iran but didn't know the details of how that started, was it Reagan or is this article true and it in fact began with Carter.

If this is true, is Carter still a saintly man of peace? What's the difference, keeping the American troops at home and using proxies instead? It's still warring, and a million civilians died, and Iraq used horrific chemical weapons with American approval.

Also, is this article right, it says it was Carter's fault the shah fell. :?:
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Jimmy Carter Speaks Out Against US Government

Postby Plantagenet » Wed 27 Jun 2012, 15:37:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'I')f its legal under international law for the US to fly drones over Pakistan and blow Afghanis up, then....

Why shouldn't China fly drones over India and blow up Tibetan dissidents?


If Romney wins and keeps the same drone policy as Bush-Obama, will you still hold the same opinion....far as I know we have *approval* from the the countries where we're doing drone ops in


(1) International law isn't contingent on who wins a US presidential election.

(2) The government of Libya never gave the US permission to do any kind of strikes in Libya, but we did hundreds of drone strikes and bombing attacks nonetheless.

(3) Pakistan withdrew permission for US drone strikes in Pakistan-----but we are continuing them nonetheless.

Pakistan withdraws US permission for drone strikes in Pakistan
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Jimmy Carter Speaks Out Against US Government

Postby Plantagenet » Wed 27 Jun 2012, 15:43:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', '
')
Also, is this article right, it says it was Carter's fault the shah fell.


Of course thats right. The result is the current anti-American Islamic Republic of Iran.

It was quite similar to the role Obama played in the fall of Mubarek in Egypt....when the US withdraws support from the evil dictator he's got little choice but to go.

With the takeover by the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt we are now on the way to having an Islamic Republic in Egypt, to go along with the Islamic Republic in Libya. Carter and Obama are both well-meaning people, but they are little weak in the long term "strategy" department 8)
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Jimmy Carter Speaks Out Against US Government

Postby ColossalContrarian » Wed 27 Jun 2012, 15:43:26

Wouldn't it be nice if all of America's (and the world's) problems could be blamed on Jimmy? Imagine how much better the US and entire world would be without his presidency.

Now that you've found the source for all the worlds problems, how are Obama or Romney going to fix it? Hope and Change or a Mormon Business man, they both get paid by the same people so I don't think anything different will happen but people clearly like getting lied to.

The fact of the mater is that US citizens do not like leaders who are realistic so we elect people who make us "feel" happy.
ColossalContrarian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1374
Joined: Tue 20 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Jimmy Carter Speaks Out Against US Government

Postby Sixstrings » Wed 27 Jun 2012, 18:22:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ColossalContrarian', 'W')ouldn't it be nice if all of America's (and the world's) problems could be blamed on Jimmy? Imagine how much better the US and entire world would be without his presidency.


We're just being objective here.

Looking beyond the surface.

Carter won the Nobel Peace Prize, well so did Obama. But in the real world there are few perfect saints of peace, and those that are don't make the best leaders in a dangerous world.

I almost wonder, if Carter had drones at the time, would he have used them in the same exact way? Toward the end of his administration his strategy was to have "mobile deployable forces" to intervene in hotspots. In the debate with Reagan, Reagan used that to question whether Carter was really the man of peace he claimed.

Carter used Iraq as a proxy to attack Iran. A million died, chemical warfare too.

Perhaps it's easy to be a perfect saint when you're not in command anymore.

Above all, I'm suspicious of Carter because he's got a cottage industry going playing good cop to America's bad cop. For all we know this is all planned.. it's useful to the US to have a ex-president who can get in the door in places where we otherwise can't. And then Carter reports back to the sitting president / state department.

Anyhow he had a good op-ed, no it's not nuanced nor objective and ignores what do we DO about terrorism if not the drones, he offers no answers only critique, but still it's wise dissent. We ARE slipping into police state zone, it would just be nice if someone actually in power would talk about it. It's like Colin Powell, they become saints AFTER they're out of government.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Jimmy Carter Speaks Out Against US Government

Postby PrestonSturges » Wed 27 Jun 2012, 21:46:14

Jimmy Carter's record on job creation was pretty astounding. He's been the victim of 30 years of wingnut slander.

And he "gave away the Panama Canal!!!!" which was supposedly a fiasco. Has that ever been a problem? No.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Jimmy Carter Speaks Out Against US Government

Postby efarmer » Wed 27 Jun 2012, 22:03:46

Our declarations, just like our Declaration of Independence are not a statement of how we are as much as a statement of how we wish to be and IMHO do to grow into our shared beliefs as a nation. This is why the political dualities citing such declarations and then using present facts and insights to measure differentially against them as if they were absolute truth when declared is simply farce with cheese sprinkled on top. It riles up pinheads to holler at each other on AM radio and sells soft drinks and probably glow in the dark condoms.

It is hard to aspire to upholding human rights, human dignity, and operate as a global projector of every sort of power, including the well intentioned and noble sort of applied power. It is hard to do since it is a money loser and there is competition that makes money by ignoring all of this sort of stuff completely or in a large part.

Whenever people of noble intentions have to run a real operation and keep it going and steer it a bit when possible to do good works, the idealism bleeds off, and the intense crisis and pressure of the real and dynamic world comes in.

The world is not a fair, nor tolerant, nor balanced, nor a Golden Rule sort of place and will never be. If we wish to be good to each other and fair, we must make good moves so that the tendency of us to be predators and kill each other for a buck or a burrito or a belief,
is tempered enough to give a few licks to the noble ideas and kind gestures. It is as good as it gets, let's not pretend we were once perfect and kind and fell from grace lately, and need to bust our ass to return there instead of slowly evolve to a higher level of civilization. Which might or might not happen either. I did not used to be perfect and am not trying to get back to it, I am flawed and trying to be better. For all the perfect folks, Rock On.
User avatar
efarmer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2003
Joined: Fri 17 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron