Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Julian Robertson Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

THE Julian Robertson Thread (merged)

Unread postby Carrie » Sun 05 Jun 2005, 15:10:31

CNBC Interview with Julian Robertson: I came across this while I was surfing last night, and it made the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. According to almartinraw.com (a subscription site), CNBC had an interview with Julian Robertson, who formerly ran Tiger Management, the world's largest hedge fund. He gave an utterly apocalyptic prediction of the future & the result of the housing bubble:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')obertson said that he's worried about the speculative bubble in housing and the fact that more than 1/4 of all consumer spending is now sustained by that bubble, plus the fact that 20 million citizens could lose their homes in a collapse of the speculative bubble in housing, and that the Fed and, indeed, central banks worldwide would act in concert out of desperation to reinflate the global economy in the process, creating an inflationary spiral unheralded in the economic history of the planet.
"Where does it end?" Robertson was asked and he said, "Utter global collapse." Not simply economic collapse; complete disintegration of all infrastructure and of all public structures of governments. Utter, utter collapse. That the end is collapse of simply epic proportion.
In 10 years time, he said, whoever is still alive on the planet will be effectively starting again."

http://goldprice.org/news/ This is the first I've heard of this. Did anyone actually see this interview? If Robertson actually said this, how credible is he?

Edit - Just found this referenced on another site as well, confirming the interview took place. Apparently it was on 5/24/05. In the comments section lower down someone posts the entire article: http://randomroger.blogspot.com/2005/05 ... rtson.html
Last edited by Ferretlover on Fri 20 Mar 2009, 21:27:27, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merge thread.
Carrie
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Jose, CA

Unread postby Jack » Sun 05 Jun 2005, 16:41:12

I didn't see the interview. A google of the name indicates he has strong credentials and a track record that would make anyone jealous.

But quite frankly...I know some people of lesser fame that are involved in the financial markets, and they are scared to death. The housing bubble is real, and we're close to a top.

Two of them are Peak Oil aware. And they regard that as the lesser problem. 8O
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby arretium » Sun 05 Jun 2005, 17:43:17

Thanks for the post guys, fascinating reads.

I wonder if Speecop, Holmes, and Ksemler and I would all come to an agreement in this area? My hunch is we would.
User avatar
arretium
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Seattle, WA

Unread postby ArimoDave » Sun 05 Jun 2005, 17:58:07

Kochevnik wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Say unemployment, bankruptcies and foreclosures skyrocket, and millions are unable to feed and/or house themselves. How many many formerly middle class Americans will the govt allow on the streets homeless and hungry (and on the 6 o'clock news every night) before it decides to do something ? Tent Cities are what I would expect to see first - like HooverVilles the last time around. More permanent housing to follow ... certainly to be situated as far from the still-employed as possible.


Wait a minute. Where did all the houses go, in this scenario? Yes, the Banks forclosed, but who
is buying the houses, and living in them? If millions are left "homeless" there are then millions of
houses left unoccupied. Could somebody explain why the houses won't be occupied?

I doubt that they would be torn down, nor could (or would) the police be able to prevent sqatters.
Many police officers would likely be in the same predicament.

Just my observation.

ArimoDave
I know exactly where we are;
. . . .
don't know where we're going, but no use in being late.
(Mathew Quigley [Tom Selleck])
User avatar
ArimoDave
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Rual ID, USA, World

Unread postby Jack » Sun 05 Jun 2005, 18:42:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ArimoDave', '
')Wait a minute. Where did all the houses go, in this scenario? Yes, the Banks forclosed, but who
is buying the houses, and living in them? If millions are left "homeless" there are then millions of
houses left unoccupied. Could somebody explain why the houses won't be occupied?


If there's a foreclosure, then some entity - probably FNMA or GNMA - will own the property. So, let's suppose a mortgage of $150M existed. To whom will they sell the property? Surely not someone that is homeless, jobless, and penniless?

Now they could simply install these new homeless in the properties rent free; but this creates a problem, does it not? Utility bills must be paid. Yards should be mowed. Maintenance must be done. But by whom? Again, if the new homeless were without resource before they were placed in the empty house, how will they suddenly possess the entire panoply of goods needed to function? Will the government supply that as well?

Suddenly, you would have a gigantic welfare system. Taxpayers would scream, not without justification. Those still paying the price of ownership would understandibly resent the windfall accorded the new neighbors.

And where will it stop? At the $500M level? The $2MM level? I saw a listing for a 2800 square foot house in California in the WSJ for $2,000,000. Will we put the first homeless family on the list in that neighborhood? That should go over like a lead balloon!
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby ArimoDave » Sun 05 Jun 2005, 18:44:32

I'm not saying that the houses will be given away, only that people will take them, or refuse to leave.
How is a government going to force millions from their homes -- many are armed -- especially when
those charged with their removal are themselves subject to eviction?

At some point, this is where things will lead given the scenario described.

ArimoDave

PS There was a time in my life when I was a Security Officer and was stationed at
apartment complexes. One of my duties was to ensure that the vacant apartments
were not used by squatters, etc. These vacant apatments were constantly being broken
into and inhabited. I made several tresspassing arrests durring these times.
I know exactly where we are;
. . . .
don't know where we're going, but no use in being late.
(Mathew Quigley [Tom Selleck])
User avatar
ArimoDave
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Rual ID, USA, World

Unread postby RonMN » Sun 05 Jun 2005, 18:54:15

If the dollar collapsed there would be no way to pay anybody...you'd be working for green toilet paper in return...therefor NOBODY would go to work, not cops, not firefighters, NOBODY! there would be nobody to evict you. Do you think bankers are going to show up at there offices to count pieces of toilet paper? Gas stations open? nope...Food stores open? nope.
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Unread postby ubercrap » Sun 05 Jun 2005, 19:07:03

Sure, if you're one of the last people to lose your livelihood near the end of the collapse, there may be nobody to collect your debt and evict you, but in the meantime, civilization will continue at some level, and those people will surely lose big time.
Last edited by ubercrap on Sun 05 Jun 2005, 20:01:50, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ubercrap
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed 27 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby Jack » Sun 05 Jun 2005, 19:10:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ArimoDave', 'I')'m not saying that the houses will be given away, only that people will take them, or refuse to leave.
How is a government going to force millions from their homes -- many are armed -- especially when
those charged with their removal are themselves subject to eviction?


Well, what both you and RonMN are suggesting is the canonical "Mad Max" scenario - which is, I suppose, in harmony with Mr. Robertson's prediction.

So I may yet get to use my toys. 8)
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby DomusAlbion » Sun 05 Jun 2005, 19:13:31

A little history on Robertson:

"Because of the "irrational" technology stock craze, Robertson suffered large losses in the late 1990s. This ultimately led him to close his investment company and liquidate its $6 billion in investments - investments which had once reached a high of $26 billion."

He's still despressed of that I would imagine.
"Modern Agriculture is the use of land to convert petroleum into food."
-- Albert Bartlett

"It will be a dark time. But for those who survive, I suspect it will be rather exciting."
-- James Lovelock
User avatar
DomusAlbion
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Beyond the Pale

Unread postby RonMN » Sun 05 Jun 2005, 19:26:35

Uber...you're right! I was reading this as an "instantanious" crash. But that may not be the case at all...even if all this was to actually unfold the way it's stated above.
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Unread postby ArimoDave » Sun 05 Jun 2005, 19:27:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ArimoDave', 'I')'m not saying that the houses will be given away, only that people will take them, or refuse to leave.
How is a government going to force millions from their homes -- many are armed -- especially when
those charged with their removal are themselves subject to eviction?


Well, what both you and RonMN are suggesting is the canonical "Mad Max" scenario - which is, I suppose, in harmony with Mr. Robertson's prediction.

So I may yet get to use my toys. 8)


Is this the most realistic scenario, however? If it is, then the place we end up is with no money,
and bartering becomes the norm. Since most in the US have a capitalistic nature, will the
public let this situation actually transpire? Or, will some other less dire set of circumstances
really occur. If so, what would life really be like?

I'm just trying to get some alternative thought processes which diverge from the "Mad Max" --
end of the world -- severe die-off line of thinking.

ArimoDave
I know exactly where we are;
. . . .
don't know where we're going, but no use in being late.
(Mathew Quigley [Tom Selleck])
User avatar
ArimoDave
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Rual ID, USA, World
Top

Unread postby RonMN » Sun 05 Jun 2005, 19:35:36

Sorry dave, I usually don't follow the mad max senerio but this article has me a little spooked. I'm hopping the old guy is simply loosing it & making up stuff...but i doubt it.
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Unread postby MicroHydro » Sun 05 Jun 2005, 20:32:13

Several nations have recently been through national bankruptcy and currency collapse. Study these to understand the near term future of the US. The most outstanding recent example would Argentina. Here is one story with some links: http://www.ctdata.com/articles/2002/08/09/0812258.shtml
"Buenos Aires looks the same in some film clips, but in others, it looks like scenes from a science fiction movie."

The financial elite have been loan sharking and forclosing on third world countries for decades, with ruinous consequences for the victims. See Confessions of an Economic Hit Man http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/ ... 65-7909762

The fat American calf is just the next to be slaughtered.
"The world is changed... I feel it in the water... I feel it in the earth... I smell it in the air... Much that once was, is lost..." - Galadriel
User avatar
MicroHydro
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun 10 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby DomusAlbion » Sun 05 Jun 2005, 20:45:46

I think Robertson has had one too many mini strokes.

Some quotes:

He said "The American consumer is effectively now supporting the rest of the planet, consumption rates in all other nations are falling, have fallen to the point that the tax revenues to governments, that the business and industries those nation states are providing is now a net negative number relative to total debt service and public cost, that this exists in virtually every nation state on the planet now."

He said "More importantly, and I´m trying to think how we imply this or how we express this to the people, what extraordinary times we are living in and how the destruction of the planet has been engineered by the Bushonian Cabal from 1980 to 1992, and then from 2001 to present, which has effectively destroyed the economic liquidity of the planet."

The guy is potty. I searched all CNBC sites and could find no reference to the Robertson interview by Ron Insana. I did find references to the interview on a site trying to sell gold and interestingly a White Supremecist site. I'm not buying into this.
Last edited by DomusAlbion on Mon 06 Jun 2005, 01:08:10, edited 1 time in total.
"Modern Agriculture is the use of land to convert petroleum into food."
-- Albert Bartlett

"It will be a dark time. But for those who survive, I suspect it will be rather exciting."
-- James Lovelock
User avatar
DomusAlbion
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Beyond the Pale

Unread postby Carrie » Sun 05 Jun 2005, 21:16:22

I'm pretty convinced that the interview actually took place. Here's some more confirmation - it's mentioned in "Squawkblog" on the MSN Spaces site. It's in the May 25th entry and says it occured yesterday:

spaces.msn

The really weird thing, though, is that all this apocalyptic talk isn't even mentioned here!

The content of the interview as stated in the article seems to be confirmed by this blogger who was responding to comments about the article:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')oger Nusbaum said...
that is the interview. He sees the potential for real problems and is not sure how we will avoid them.

However there were no tears involved as I saw the interview. What I know of Mr. Robertson, I would take it as he sees a potential problem, it plays out or not but he does not get emotional when it comes to economic and financial matter. My take.

http://randomroger.blogspot.com/2005/05 ... rtson.html

but you're right; I haven't seen this mentioned anywhere in the news. I wish someone who actually saw the interview could confirm it here. Maybe CNBC offers transcripts of past shows.

{URL /Agren}
Carrie
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Jose, CA
Top

Unread postby Jack » Sun 05 Jun 2005, 21:16:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ArimoDave', '
')
Is this the most realistic scenario, however? If it is, then the place we end up is with no money,
and bartering becomes the norm. Since most in the US have a capitalistic nature, will the
public let this situation actually transpire? Or, will some other less dire set of circumstances
really occur. If so, what would life really be like?



No, there's a lot to indicate it isn't particularly realistic. One of my favorite examples (that may be a poor choice of words) is the situation in Hiroshima after the atomic explosion. People tended to do their jobs, help others, and so forth. This was also the case during the great depression in the U.S.

I suspect we'll have some semblance of order, some vestige of society, punctuated by bouts of crime and lawlessness.

Life will probably be much like today...just poorer, more local, harder work - and shorter.
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby ubercrap » Sun 05 Jun 2005, 21:32:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carrie', 'I')'m pretty convinced that the interview actually took place. Here's some more confirmation - it's mentioned in "Squawkblog" on the MSN Spaces site. It's in the May 25th entry and says it occured yesterday:

spaces.msn

The really weird thing, though, is that all this apocalyptic talk isn't even mentioned here!

The content of the interview as stated in the article seems to be confirmed by this blogger who was responding to comments about the article:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')oger Nusbaum said...
that is the interview. He sees the potential for real problems and is not sure how we will avoid them.

However there were no tears involved as I saw the interview. What I know of Mr. Robertson, I would take it as he sees a potential problem, it plays out or not but he does not get emotional when it comes to economic and financial matter. My take.

http://randomroger.blogspot.com/2005/05 ... rtson.html

but you're right; I haven't seen this mentioned anywhere in the news. I wish someone who actually saw the interview could confirm it here. Maybe CNBC offers transcripts of past shows.


I'm also skeptical now of the validity of the interview also...

{URL /Agren}
User avatar
ubercrap
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed 27 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby gg3 » Mon 06 Jun 2005, 06:52:26

Let's work our way back from "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man." The book's blurb refers to him being (paraphrase) recruited by the top-secret NSA to go to foreign countries and implement mean & nasty economic policies... Sorry folks, that's just wrong. NSA does signals intelligence, communications security, and basic technology development. NSA also invented the large-scale integrated circuit and then gave it to the civilian world. Your average NSA employee has a degree in math or something close. My average scepticism about this particular book just got two notches higher.

Now on to the original posting... the lengthy quote about the Robertson interview is really sloppy as hell. It doesn't make clear where Robertson's words begin and the poster's words end, or vice-versa. There are, at minimum, sloppy paraphrases and unattributed statements that could be either Robertson or the poster speaking. The mix of economic doom forecasting and political rant is typical of people for whom ideology has overtaken objectivity. So up goes the scepticism factor by another couple of notches.

Now I may be mistaken, and am about to go read the other topic on this subject. But at present I think the scepticism is justified.

In any case, we do not need people shouting fire in a crowded theatre that already smells of wood smoke. What we need is for people to stand up and quietly get everyone in their particular row to walk, calmly, toward the nearest exit.
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Unread postby julianj » Mon 06 Jun 2005, 10:13:19

It does seem unneccessarily apocalyptic. Russia and Argentina have suffered economic meltdowns in recent memory, and while they were pretty grim, they weren't any where as near Mad Max ish as some of the above posts. I can't see any govt wanting to have 25% of its (armed) citizens homeless and hungry.
julianj
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu 30 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: On one of the blades of the fan

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron