by Sixstrings » Sat 16 Jun 2012, 09:49:37
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Timo', 'J')ust a thought, and i know nothing that would substantiate this theory, but it seems to me that the only way an otherwise seemingly honest politician would allow deals like this to be crafted, and then to come out and support them is through some form of blackmail.
More like bribery. Campaign donations.
There's another side to this globalism argument, it's not all about money, the liberal globalists think that raising living standards and wages in foreign countries (by exporting our jobs) results in a more peaceful, happier world.
To some degree they're right.
And, could we Americans expect to have high wage jobs forever and ever? I guess not. India deserves something too, one American job here offshored there can employ 10 or 20 for the same price.
But thing is.. I'm an American I'm not a globalist humanist saint in an ivory tower looking down at the world. I don't want my country to level out with Mexico and India and look like a pile of crap with cripples in the street wearing rags and leppers and drug wars.
The subject of this thread is another step though beyond just free trade, now the new international tribunal could rule that Chinese infant formula or dog food is safe even if we think it isn't, even if it doesn't meet US standards, we'll be forced to allow it if the tribunal rules to favor Chinese law.
On and on, China could conceivably get waivers to all kinds of US law from environmental protections to banking regulations. Food and product safety are the biggest concern to we little folks, I'm still mad about that, fickin' dog food killing our dogs and the toxic drywall mess, kids' toys made with lead paint and toxic materials. All that is already going on right now, so what happens if China starts getting waivers to bring Chinese law over here?