by eXpat » Fri 20 Apr 2012, 11:33:59
Venezuela agrees to that number, in fact, it seems to be established policy for them now:
Venezuela's PDVSA Sends Oil to Asia to Fetch Better Price
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'V')enezuela, South America’s largest oil producer, curtails production to comply with its OPEC quota and keep oil prices from falling, Ramirez said. The country plans to produce an average of 3.13 million barrels a day of oil in 2012 and end the year with daily production capacity of 3.5 million barrels, said Ramirez, who is also the country’s oil and mining minister.
“We’re worried about stability in oil prices and working to construct a price floor of $100 a barrel. We see some OPEC countries producing more than their quotas,” Ramirez told reporters. “Rising inventories are a terrible signal that there is over production.”
The country’s oil export price fell 1 percent in the week ending April 13 to $113.85 from $115.01 the prior week.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-17/venezuela-s-pdvsa-sends-oil-to-asia-to-fetch-better-price.htmlI wonder though, if it is Venezuelan policy alone, or maybe an agreement behind close doors within OPEC?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Over lunch a week ago, Hansen told me that “global spare capacity is approaching zero from a statistical standpoint,” and those conditions are the primary driver of the recent rise in oil prices.
Hansen is not an alarmist when it comes to energy, and doesn’t expect a return to the lines that snarled streets near gasoline stations during the 1973 oil crisis. His analysis is backed by a careful examination of the data.
One troubling statistic that the media largely ignores, according to Hansen, is the background depletion rate from existing oil wells, which Hansen conservatively pegged between 3% and 4%. This is the percent reduction in production from existing wells. With total world crude oil production now at 75 million barrels per day, the same wells will produce only 72 or 73 million next year. That 3%-4% depletion rate has to be made up for by new wells coming on line if world production is not to decline.
That problem, Hansen said, looms larger than the growth in demand. Chinese demand, for example, might grow by 10% next year, which is less than the 2-3 million barrels lost to depletion. “Everyone focuses on China,” he said, “and overlooks depletion which never takes a break like China may if its economy slows.”
“Even if there is spare capacity,” Hansen said, “There is still a problem.”
Hansen is skeptical about recent claims by the Saudis that they have as much as 25% spare capacity. If they had that much capacity, then Hansen said there is no reason why they wouldn’t have brought it on-line sooner.
But even if those spare capacity claims are true, one must consider the Saudi’s internal needs. Saudi Arabia is reserving a rapidly growing percentage of its oil production for internal consumption.
...
This year’s numbers are not influenced as much by commodities traders, because there is less volatility than in 2008, Hansen said.
The global economy will have trouble with oil prices above $125 per barrel, Hansen said. At the other end, the cost of production establishes a floor for oil prices. That cost ranges from around $80-$90 per barrel for Saudi Arabia to $100 for Russia. Those are the prices necessary to guarantee domestic stability, since both countries use oil revenue for political purposes; the variable cost of production is much lower.
“That’s not a big window,” Hansen said, “and it’s getting tighter, because the floor is going up as the cost of exploration, extraction and production of oil goes up.” When prices go outside of that zone, “someone suffers,” he said.